美国老年人居住在养老院与参加体育活动之间的联系

Weijiao Zhou, J. Larson
{"title":"美国老年人居住在养老院与参加体育活动之间的联系","authors":"Weijiao Zhou, J. Larson","doi":"10.1097/NR9.0000000000000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Physical activity (PA) is important for the healthy aging period, and existing research indicates that older adults in residential care facilities (RCFs) are less physically active compared with community-dwelling, but sociodemographic and health-related characteristics were not controlled. Lower PA levels might be due to older age and worse health conditions of the RCFs residents. Objective: This study examined the association between residential status (RCF vs. community-dwelling) and participation in PA, in a sample of 4009 older adults (65 and above) in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Methods: The current study used Rounds 8 and 9 of the NHATS which was collected in 2018 and 2019. We conducted design-based logistic regression analyses to determine whether residential care status was significantly associated with participation in walking exercises and vigorous activities, and controlled for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Results: Using multivariable logistic regression models, older adults in RCFs (n=214) were more likely to participate in walking exercises (adjusted odds ratios=1.94, P<0.01) and equally likely to participate in vigorous activities (adjusted odds ratios=1.04, P=0.84) than community-dwelling (n=3795). Conclusions: Our finding adds new evidence to the conventional thinking about the potential effect of RCFs on PA. Further research is needed to address the underlying mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"30 7","pages":"27 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of living in residential care facilities with participation in physical activities among older adults in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Weijiao Zhou, J. Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NR9.0000000000000018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Physical activity (PA) is important for the healthy aging period, and existing research indicates that older adults in residential care facilities (RCFs) are less physically active compared with community-dwelling, but sociodemographic and health-related characteristics were not controlled. Lower PA levels might be due to older age and worse health conditions of the RCFs residents. Objective: This study examined the association between residential status (RCF vs. community-dwelling) and participation in PA, in a sample of 4009 older adults (65 and above) in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Methods: The current study used Rounds 8 and 9 of the NHATS which was collected in 2018 and 2019. We conducted design-based logistic regression analyses to determine whether residential care status was significantly associated with participation in walking exercises and vigorous activities, and controlled for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Results: Using multivariable logistic regression models, older adults in RCFs (n=214) were more likely to participate in walking exercises (adjusted odds ratios=1.94, P<0.01) and equally likely to participate in vigorous activities (adjusted odds ratios=1.04, P=0.84) than community-dwelling (n=3795). Conclusions: Our finding adds new evidence to the conventional thinking about the potential effect of RCFs on PA. Further research is needed to address the underlying mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary nursing research\",\"volume\":\"30 7\",\"pages\":\"27 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary nursing research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NR9.0000000000000018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NR9.0000000000000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景:体力活动(Physical activity, PA)对于健康的老年期至关重要,现有研究表明,与社区居住相比,居住在养老院(residential care facilities, rcf)的老年人体力活动较少,但社会人口学和健康相关特征未得到控制。较低的PA水平可能是由于rcf居民年龄较大和健康状况较差。目的:本研究在国家健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)的4009名老年人(65岁及以上)的样本中,检查了居住状态(RCF vs.社区居住)与参与PA之间的关系,调整了社会人口统计学和健康相关特征。方法:本研究使用了2018年和2019年收集的NHATS的第8轮和第9轮。我们进行了基于设计的逻辑回归分析,以确定住院护理状态是否与步行锻炼和剧烈活动的参与显著相关,并控制了社会人口统计学和健康相关特征。结果:采用多变量logistic回归模型,rcf中的老年人(n=214)比社区居民(n=3795)更有可能参加步行锻炼(调整优势比=1.94,P<0.01),同样有可能参加剧烈运动(调整优势比=1.04,P=0.84)。结论:我们的发现为RCFs对PA的潜在影响的传统思维提供了新的证据。需要进一步的研究来解决潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations of living in residential care facilities with participation in physical activities among older adults in the United States
Abstract Background: Physical activity (PA) is important for the healthy aging period, and existing research indicates that older adults in residential care facilities (RCFs) are less physically active compared with community-dwelling, but sociodemographic and health-related characteristics were not controlled. Lower PA levels might be due to older age and worse health conditions of the RCFs residents. Objective: This study examined the association between residential status (RCF vs. community-dwelling) and participation in PA, in a sample of 4009 older adults (65 and above) in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Methods: The current study used Rounds 8 and 9 of the NHATS which was collected in 2018 and 2019. We conducted design-based logistic regression analyses to determine whether residential care status was significantly associated with participation in walking exercises and vigorous activities, and controlled for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Results: Using multivariable logistic regression models, older adults in RCFs (n=214) were more likely to participate in walking exercises (adjusted odds ratios=1.94, P<0.01) and equally likely to participate in vigorous activities (adjusted odds ratios=1.04, P=0.84) than community-dwelling (n=3795). Conclusions: Our finding adds new evidence to the conventional thinking about the potential effect of RCFs on PA. Further research is needed to address the underlying mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinary collaboration for chronic illness prevention and management through digital health interventions. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and neurodevelopmental outcomes among black and white preterm infants up to two years of age. Nurse-led self-management support to improve symptom management and self-reported outcomes in people with irritable bowel syndrome. Research of assisted housing design for the bedridden elderly and their family caregivers Digital twin prevalence in the medical caring fields: a bibliomatrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1