股票市场崩盘的经验规律

Edward J. Egan
{"title":"股票市场崩盘的经验规律","authors":"Edward J. Egan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a stock market crash is defined as the period from an index's prior peak until its recovery, crashes demonstrate empirical regularities in their scale and timing. For instance, measures of the duration, maximum decline, and lost value of crashes are very highly correlated. These correlations suggest that crashes belong to well-defined categories based on their size and become increasingly predictable as they progress. Accordingly, I advance four stock market crash categories, which are logarithmic in size. Crashes then range from small scale market disturbances like 'flash crashes' in Category 1 to the Wall Street Crash of 1929, America's sole Category 4. Furthermore, I find that U.S. stock markets are bimodal, switching between crashes and booms, and that this switching is regular. Specifically, I find that either a Category 2 or 3 crash occurs every four years, with a variance of just two years. Moreover, by definition, growth during a crash is close to zero. During boom periods, however, the average annual growth rate is 21.5%. Together, these results suggest a new foundation for examining patterns of returns and other characteristics of stock markets.","PeriodicalId":11410,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Regularities in Stock Market Crashes\",\"authors\":\"Edward J. Egan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3679630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When a stock market crash is defined as the period from an index's prior peak until its recovery, crashes demonstrate empirical regularities in their scale and timing. For instance, measures of the duration, maximum decline, and lost value of crashes are very highly correlated. These correlations suggest that crashes belong to well-defined categories based on their size and become increasingly predictable as they progress. Accordingly, I advance four stock market crash categories, which are logarithmic in size. Crashes then range from small scale market disturbances like 'flash crashes' in Category 1 to the Wall Street Crash of 1929, America's sole Category 4. Furthermore, I find that U.S. stock markets are bimodal, switching between crashes and booms, and that this switching is regular. Specifically, I find that either a Category 2 or 3 crash occurs every four years, with a variance of just two years. Moreover, by definition, growth during a crash is close to zero. During boom periods, however, the average annual growth rate is 21.5%. Together, these results suggest a new foundation for examining patterns of returns and other characteristics of stock markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当股市崩盘被定义为从指数之前的峰值到其恢复的时期时,崩盘在规模和时间上表现出经验规律。例如,持续时间、最大跌幅和崩盘损失价值的度量是高度相关的。这些相关性表明,根据其规模,崩溃属于明确定义的类别,并且随着它们的发展变得越来越可预测。因此,我提出了四种股票市场崩溃的类别,它们在规模上是对数的。崩盘的范围从第一类的“闪电崩盘”这样的小规模市场动荡,到1929年的华尔街崩盘(美国唯一的第四级崩盘)。此外,我发现美国股市是双峰的,在崩溃和繁荣之间切换,这种切换是有规律的。具体来说,我发现第2类或第3类崩盘每四年发生一次,变化幅度仅为两年。此外,根据定义,崩盘期间的经济增长接近于零。然而,在经济繁荣时期,年均增长率为21.5%。总之,这些结果为研究股票市场的回报模式和其他特征提供了一个新的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical Regularities in Stock Market Crashes
When a stock market crash is defined as the period from an index's prior peak until its recovery, crashes demonstrate empirical regularities in their scale and timing. For instance, measures of the duration, maximum decline, and lost value of crashes are very highly correlated. These correlations suggest that crashes belong to well-defined categories based on their size and become increasingly predictable as they progress. Accordingly, I advance four stock market crash categories, which are logarithmic in size. Crashes then range from small scale market disturbances like 'flash crashes' in Category 1 to the Wall Street Crash of 1929, America's sole Category 4. Furthermore, I find that U.S. stock markets are bimodal, switching between crashes and booms, and that this switching is regular. Specifically, I find that either a Category 2 or 3 crash occurs every four years, with a variance of just two years. Moreover, by definition, growth during a crash is close to zero. During boom periods, however, the average annual growth rate is 21.5%. Together, these results suggest a new foundation for examining patterns of returns and other characteristics of stock markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corporate Loan Spreads and Economic Activity The Effect of Internal and External Factors on Credit Risk : A Study on Shawbrook Bank Limited in United Kingdom Systemic Risk in Interbank Networks: Disentangling Balance Sheets and Network Effects Credit & Lending Decisions Assessment Report on Ramsay Health Care Identifying the Information Polarities in Credit Risk Transfer Instruments; A Case for Regulatory Product Intervention and Product Liability Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1