香港一所中学推行不同类型的教学大纲

Hongqi Chu
{"title":"香港一所中学推行不同类型的教学大纲","authors":"Hongqi Chu","doi":"10.17977/um031v9i22022p108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rubrics were traditionally a perfect choice for assessing performance. Yet, most rubrics and previous research only focused on its traditional summative aspect, limiting its functions, or even leading to some inappropriate usage or misconception of using rubrics. As formative assessment was found to favor low-achieving students, it has become increasingly popular that rubrics can also be used for formative use and help reduce learning diversity. In this study, different types of rubrics in a Hong Kong Secondary School were investigated, which has been a popular tool that has been widely used among various subjects as an assessment tool. The classification of the rubrics based on different learning areas unveiled that distinct learning areas tended to use heterogeneous rubrics, so the implementation and learning outcomes were then reviewed. It was also noted that a rubric was used for formative assessment in a newly developed STEM curriculum, hence the effectiveness was examined. ","PeriodicalId":32038,"journal":{"name":"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Implementation of Different Types of Rubrics in a Hong Kong Secondary School\",\"authors\":\"Hongqi Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.17977/um031v9i22022p108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rubrics were traditionally a perfect choice for assessing performance. Yet, most rubrics and previous research only focused on its traditional summative aspect, limiting its functions, or even leading to some inappropriate usage or misconception of using rubrics. As formative assessment was found to favor low-achieving students, it has become increasingly popular that rubrics can also be used for formative use and help reduce learning diversity. In this study, different types of rubrics in a Hong Kong Secondary School were investigated, which has been a popular tool that has been widely used among various subjects as an assessment tool. The classification of the rubrics based on different learning areas unveiled that distinct learning areas tended to use heterogeneous rubrics, so the implementation and learning outcomes were then reviewed. It was also noted that a rubric was used for formative assessment in a newly developed STEM curriculum, hence the effectiveness was examined. \",\"PeriodicalId\":32038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v9i22022p108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v9i22022p108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,指标是评估绩效的完美选择。然而,大多数的标题和以往的研究只关注其传统的总结性方面,限制了标题的功能,甚至导致了一些对标题的不当使用或误解。由于形成性评估被发现倾向于成绩较差的学生,因此越来越多的人认为,标准也可以用于形成性评估,并有助于减少学习多样性。在这项研究中,我们调查了一所香港中学的不同类型的标题,这是一种很受欢迎的工具,被广泛用于各种科目作为评估工具。基于不同学习领域的规则分类揭示了不同学习领域倾向于使用异质规则,因此对实施和学习结果进行了回顾。委员会还注意到,在新制定的STEM课程中,使用了一个评分标准进行形成性评估,因此对其有效性进行了审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Implementation of Different Types of Rubrics in a Hong Kong Secondary School
Rubrics were traditionally a perfect choice for assessing performance. Yet, most rubrics and previous research only focused on its traditional summative aspect, limiting its functions, or even leading to some inappropriate usage or misconception of using rubrics. As formative assessment was found to favor low-achieving students, it has become increasingly popular that rubrics can also be used for formative use and help reduce learning diversity. In this study, different types of rubrics in a Hong Kong Secondary School were investigated, which has been a popular tool that has been widely used among various subjects as an assessment tool. The classification of the rubrics based on different learning areas unveiled that distinct learning areas tended to use heterogeneous rubrics, so the implementation and learning outcomes were then reviewed. It was also noted that a rubric was used for formative assessment in a newly developed STEM curriculum, hence the effectiveness was examined. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Students’ Cognitive Engagement and Academic Performance in A Flipped Classroom Model in Outstanding Class Program Pengembangan e-modul berbasis pbl untuk meningkatkan kemampuan analisis dan rasa ingin tahu siswa Digitalisasi ajaran Ki-Hadjar-Dewantara pada proses pembelajaran neo-guided inquiry untuk mengembangkan literasi dan numerasi mahasiswa Implementasi Model PjBL-STEAM konteks lahan basah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy peserta didik Implementation and challenges of project-based learning of STEAM in the university during the pandemic: A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1