{"title":"批判性反思是解决教育及其他领域不平等问题的工具","authors":"Eden Rivera, Langan Courtney, Heidi Bloom","doi":"10.36315/2023v1end147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Society, perhaps more than ever, is open to disrupting racist, colonial, and oppressive policies and systems. Engaging critical reflexivity (CR) in education spaces is one potential way to move this work forward. CR is “an ‘unsettling’ of the basic assumptions, discourse, and practices used in describing reality” (Pollner, 1991, p. 370). It involves examining assumptions underlying our actions and examining how these assumptions and related actions influence meaning and contribute to creating, sustaining, and/or transforming “realities” and ourselves (Cunliffe, 2020, p. 3). CR can expose contradictions, uncertainties, and possibilities within ourselves and in relation to the world around us (Cunliffe, 2020) while also enhancing our ability to explore positionality and power dynamics. The purpose of this workshop is to engage with CR as an intervention to deconstruct the existing power hierarchies in one’s work environment, education, and knowledge base. CR is a potential tool to help educators foster inclusive, equitable, and safe learning environments for their students. This session will provide a safe space to engage with CR and to work toward addressing the disconnect between “talk” and “application” in education, with an aim of bridging the gap between theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":93546,"journal":{"name":"Education and new developments","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CRITICAL REFLEXIVITY AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING INEQUITIES IN EDUCATION AND BEYOND\",\"authors\":\"Eden Rivera, Langan Courtney, Heidi Bloom\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2023v1end147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Society, perhaps more than ever, is open to disrupting racist, colonial, and oppressive policies and systems. Engaging critical reflexivity (CR) in education spaces is one potential way to move this work forward. CR is “an ‘unsettling’ of the basic assumptions, discourse, and practices used in describing reality” (Pollner, 1991, p. 370). It involves examining assumptions underlying our actions and examining how these assumptions and related actions influence meaning and contribute to creating, sustaining, and/or transforming “realities” and ourselves (Cunliffe, 2020, p. 3). CR can expose contradictions, uncertainties, and possibilities within ourselves and in relation to the world around us (Cunliffe, 2020) while also enhancing our ability to explore positionality and power dynamics. The purpose of this workshop is to engage with CR as an intervention to deconstruct the existing power hierarchies in one’s work environment, education, and knowledge base. CR is a potential tool to help educators foster inclusive, equitable, and safe learning environments for their students. This session will provide a safe space to engage with CR and to work toward addressing the disconnect between “talk” and “application” in education, with an aim of bridging the gap between theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and new developments\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and new developments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and new developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
社会可能比以往任何时候都更愿意破坏种族主义、殖民主义和压迫性的政策和制度。在教育空间中引入批判性反思(CR)是推动这项工作向前发展的一种潜在方式。社会责任是“对描述现实的基本假设、话语和实践的一种‘不安’”(Pollner, 1991, p. 370)。它包括检查我们行为背后的假设,并检查这些假设和相关行为如何影响意义,并有助于创造、维持和/或改变“现实”和我们自己(Cunliffe, 2020,第3页)。CR可以暴露我们自己内部以及与我们周围世界相关的矛盾、不确定性和可能性(Cunliffe, 2020),同时也增强了我们探索地位和权力动态的能力。本次研讨会的目的是将社会责任作为一种干预手段,解构一个人在工作环境、教育和知识基础中的现有权力等级。社会责任是一个潜在的工具,可以帮助教育工作者为学生营造包容、公平和安全的学习环境。本次会议将提供一个安全的空间来参与社会责任,并致力于解决教育中“谈论”和“应用”之间的脱节,旨在弥合理论与实践之间的差距。
CRITICAL REFLEXIVITY AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING INEQUITIES IN EDUCATION AND BEYOND
Society, perhaps more than ever, is open to disrupting racist, colonial, and oppressive policies and systems. Engaging critical reflexivity (CR) in education spaces is one potential way to move this work forward. CR is “an ‘unsettling’ of the basic assumptions, discourse, and practices used in describing reality” (Pollner, 1991, p. 370). It involves examining assumptions underlying our actions and examining how these assumptions and related actions influence meaning and contribute to creating, sustaining, and/or transforming “realities” and ourselves (Cunliffe, 2020, p. 3). CR can expose contradictions, uncertainties, and possibilities within ourselves and in relation to the world around us (Cunliffe, 2020) while also enhancing our ability to explore positionality and power dynamics. The purpose of this workshop is to engage with CR as an intervention to deconstruct the existing power hierarchies in one’s work environment, education, and knowledge base. CR is a potential tool to help educators foster inclusive, equitable, and safe learning environments for their students. This session will provide a safe space to engage with CR and to work toward addressing the disconnect between “talk” and “application” in education, with an aim of bridging the gap between theory and practice.