奎林·莫拉莱斯诉特曼案:性别、性行为和青少年的治疗权

L. Gutterman
{"title":"奎林·莫拉莱斯诉特曼案:性别、性行为和青少年的治疗权","authors":"L. Gutterman","doi":"10.1353/wsq.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article complicates understandings of Morales v. Turman, a class action lawsuit filed in 1971 on behalf of juveniles in six Texas Youth Council (TYC) institutions, as a victory for incarcerated youth. Drawing on Morales's substantial legal archives, this article highlights the ways the lawyers, social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists who came together on behalf of incarcerated youth in this case understood the state's capacity to foster and enforce gender and sexual conformity as a social good. While they hoped to protect incarcerated children from state violence and to affirm their constitutional rights, these experts helped to embed a pathological conception of homosexuality and gender nonconformity into the broader legal battle for juvenile offenders' \"right to treatment.\" In ushering in a treatment-focused juvenile justice regime, the expert witnesses who testified on behalf of the plaintiffs also helped to foster the TYC's turn away from traditional carceral institutions toward community-based residential facilities.","PeriodicalId":23857,"journal":{"name":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queering Morales v. Turman: Gender, Sexuality, and Juveniles' Right to Treatment\",\"authors\":\"L. Gutterman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wsq.2023.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article complicates understandings of Morales v. Turman, a class action lawsuit filed in 1971 on behalf of juveniles in six Texas Youth Council (TYC) institutions, as a victory for incarcerated youth. Drawing on Morales's substantial legal archives, this article highlights the ways the lawyers, social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists who came together on behalf of incarcerated youth in this case understood the state's capacity to foster and enforce gender and sexual conformity as a social good. While they hoped to protect incarcerated children from state violence and to affirm their constitutional rights, these experts helped to embed a pathological conception of homosexuality and gender nonconformity into the broader legal battle for juvenile offenders' \\\"right to treatment.\\\" In ushering in a treatment-focused juvenile justice regime, the expert witnesses who testified on behalf of the plaintiffs also helped to foster the TYC's turn away from traditional carceral institutions toward community-based residential facilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2023.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:莫拉莱斯诉图尔曼案(Morales v. Turman)是一起发生在1971年的集体诉讼案,原告是德克萨斯州六所青年理事会(TYC)机构的青少年,该案被认为是狱中青少年的胜利。本文利用莫拉莱斯的大量法律档案,强调律师、社会工作者、心理学家和精神科医生在本案中代表被监禁的青少年,了解国家培育和执行性别和性一致性的能力,并将其视为一种社会利益。虽然他们希望保护被监禁的儿童免受国家暴力,并确认他们的宪法权利,但这些专家帮助将同性恋和性别不一致的病态概念嵌入到为少年犯“治疗权”而进行的更广泛的法律斗争中。在引入以治疗为重点的少年司法制度的过程中,代表原告作证的专家证人也帮助促进了少年司法中心从传统的拘留所转向以社区为基础的居住设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Queering Morales v. Turman: Gender, Sexuality, and Juveniles' Right to Treatment
Abstract:This article complicates understandings of Morales v. Turman, a class action lawsuit filed in 1971 on behalf of juveniles in six Texas Youth Council (TYC) institutions, as a victory for incarcerated youth. Drawing on Morales's substantial legal archives, this article highlights the ways the lawyers, social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists who came together on behalf of incarcerated youth in this case understood the state's capacity to foster and enforce gender and sexual conformity as a social good. While they hoped to protect incarcerated children from state violence and to affirm their constitutional rights, these experts helped to embed a pathological conception of homosexuality and gender nonconformity into the broader legal battle for juvenile offenders' "right to treatment." In ushering in a treatment-focused juvenile justice regime, the expert witnesses who testified on behalf of the plaintiffs also helped to foster the TYC's turn away from traditional carceral institutions toward community-based residential facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Education "in the Belly of the Monster": The Third World Women's Alliance's "Tuesday Schedule" Queering Morales v. Turman: Gender, Sexuality, and Juveniles' Right to Treatment "We Wanted to Talk Plumbing": Organizing and Mutual Aid in Baltimore's High-Rise Public Housing Uncertainty as Statecraft: Family Movements Contesting Disappearance Selections from Triple Jeopardy 1, no. 1 (September-October 1971)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1