从学生视角看萨那大学教育学院教师对教学策略的运用程度

أ.م.د. عبد السلام عبده قاسم المخلافي
{"title":"从学生视角看萨那大学教育学院教师对教学策略的运用程度","authors":"أ.م.د. عبد السلام عبده قاسم المخلافي","doi":"10.20428/jss.v28i2.1927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify the degree of using teaching strategies by teachers in the Faculty of Education – Sana'a University from their students’ perspectives, and to find out to what extent there are significant differences between means of students’ perspectives attributed to their specializations and gender. For the purpose of achieving these objectives, the researcherused the descriptive, evaluative method, and designed a questionnaire of 32 teaching strategies to measure students’ opinions. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 270 male and female students, who were selected by the stratum random method. The study results showed that the level of using teaching strategies in the Faculty of Education scored a mean of (2.59) at a relative weight of (59.02). From the students’ perspective, the most used strategies were lecturing, concept maps, dialogue, discussions,brain storming, deduction and induction, and text analysis, whereas the least used were discovering, electronic learning, role play, peer teaching, field visits, debate, participatory teaching, contract strategy, six hats, learning cycle and flipped learning. There were no statistically significance differences at the level of (0.05) between the means of students’ perspectives about using teaching strategies attributed to their gender and specialization. Based on the results, the study recommends using various effective strategies, training teaching staff on using teaching strategies and segregating students into classrooms according to quality assurance standards.","PeriodicalId":34495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Degree of Using Teaching Strategies by the Teaching Staff in the Faculty of Education - Sana'a University from the Students’ Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"أ.م.د. عبد السلام عبده قاسم المخلافي\",\"doi\":\"10.20428/jss.v28i2.1927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to identify the degree of using teaching strategies by teachers in the Faculty of Education – Sana'a University from their students’ perspectives, and to find out to what extent there are significant differences between means of students’ perspectives attributed to their specializations and gender. For the purpose of achieving these objectives, the researcherused the descriptive, evaluative method, and designed a questionnaire of 32 teaching strategies to measure students’ opinions. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 270 male and female students, who were selected by the stratum random method. The study results showed that the level of using teaching strategies in the Faculty of Education scored a mean of (2.59) at a relative weight of (59.02). From the students’ perspective, the most used strategies were lecturing, concept maps, dialogue, discussions,brain storming, deduction and induction, and text analysis, whereas the least used were discovering, electronic learning, role play, peer teaching, field visits, debate, participatory teaching, contract strategy, six hats, learning cycle and flipped learning. There were no statistically significance differences at the level of (0.05) between the means of students’ perspectives about using teaching strategies attributed to their gender and specialization. Based on the results, the study recommends using various effective strategies, training teaching staff on using teaching strategies and segregating students into classrooms according to quality assurance standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20428/jss.v28i2.1927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/jss.v28i2.1927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定萨那大学教育学院教师从学生的角度使用教学策略的程度,并找出学生的角度在多大程度上因专业和性别而有显著差异。为了实现这些目标,研究者采用描述性、评价性的方法,设计了一份包含32种教学策略的问卷来测量学生的意见。采用分层随机抽样法,对270名男女大学生进行问卷调查。研究结果表明,教育学院教学策略运用水平的平均得分为2.59分,相对权重为59.02分。从学生的角度来看,使用最多的策略是讲授、概念图、对话、讨论、头脑风暴、演绎归纳和文本分析,而使用最少的策略是发现、电子学习、角色扮演、同伴教学、实地考察、辩论、参与式教学、契约策略、六顶帽子、学习循环和翻转学习。不同性别、不同专业的学生对教学策略使用的看法均值差异无统计学意义(0.05)。根据研究结果,本研究建议采用各种有效的策略,培训教师使用教学策略,并根据质量保证标准将学生分班。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Degree of Using Teaching Strategies by the Teaching Staff in the Faculty of Education - Sana'a University from the Students’ Perspectives
This study aimed to identify the degree of using teaching strategies by teachers in the Faculty of Education – Sana'a University from their students’ perspectives, and to find out to what extent there are significant differences between means of students’ perspectives attributed to their specializations and gender. For the purpose of achieving these objectives, the researcherused the descriptive, evaluative method, and designed a questionnaire of 32 teaching strategies to measure students’ opinions. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 270 male and female students, who were selected by the stratum random method. The study results showed that the level of using teaching strategies in the Faculty of Education scored a mean of (2.59) at a relative weight of (59.02). From the students’ perspective, the most used strategies were lecturing, concept maps, dialogue, discussions,brain storming, deduction and induction, and text analysis, whereas the least used were discovering, electronic learning, role play, peer teaching, field visits, debate, participatory teaching, contract strategy, six hats, learning cycle and flipped learning. There were no statistically significance differences at the level of (0.05) between the means of students’ perspectives about using teaching strategies attributed to their gender and specialization. Based on the results, the study recommends using various effective strategies, training teaching staff on using teaching strategies and segregating students into classrooms according to quality assurance standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Grammatical Evidence for the Present Tense in Sahih Al-Bukhari (a descriptive and analytical study) The Role of administrative control tools on improving job performance in the Cooperative and Agricultural Credit Bank National Symbols and Linguistic pedagogy: A Critical Examination of Patriotic Elements in First-Grade Intermediate English Textbooks in the Iraqi Educational Context Domestication and Foreignization in Two Arabic Translations of Hemingway’s Short Story Collection Men without Women Human-AI collaboration in translation and back translation of literary texts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1