IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1017/rmu.2018.7
S. McRoberts
{"title":"CAESAR'S ‘VIRGILIAN’ KATABASIS AT TROY IN LUCAN BELLVM CIVILE 9.950–99","authors":"S. McRoberts","doi":"10.1017/rmu.2018.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caesar's visit to Troy has always been something of an enigma. Historically, the episode is unattested. Caesar wanders through a congeries of sites at Troy ranging from Ajax's grave on the Rhoetium promontory at its beginning to Priam's Herceian altar at the end. Numerous interpretations have been offered. Bruère has argued for Aeneas' tour through the future site of Rome in Aeneid 8 as a backdrop. Ahl has noted the connection between the ruins of Italy described in Bellum Ciuile (B.C.) 7 and the ruins of Troy in B.C. 9. Rome/Italy and Troy merge in essence as vanishing fabulae, which the poet keeps alive. Zwierlein sees Caesar's visit as modeled on Alexander the Great's visit nearly three hundred years earlier. Caesar through this scene is established as a destroyer of empires, inferior only to Alexander. Ormand stresses Caesar as an authoritative reader of the ruins of Troy, where Caesar reads the Aeneid instead of the Iliad. Rossi similarly focuses on Caesar as reading Troy's ruins to the advantage of the Julian dynasty. Gergo has opened up the passage with the correct observation that Lucan has in mind Aeneas’ katabasis in Aeneid 6. But the relationship between the brief tour at Troy and Aeneid 6 is both more comprehensive and precise. Indeed this essay will present a systematic interpretation of Caesar's tour as a parallel to Aeneid 6 in its entirety, a parallel to which Lucan most likely does not give his character Caesar access.","PeriodicalId":43863,"journal":{"name":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","volume":"20 1","pages":"58 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恺撒对特洛伊的访问一直是个谜。从历史上看,这种情况是未经证实的。凯撒漫步于特洛伊的众多遗址之间,从一开始阿贾克斯的坟墓到最后普里阿摩斯的赫塞斯祭坛。人们提供了许多解释。brure主张埃涅阿斯在《埃涅伊德》第8章中以罗马的未来遗址为背景进行旅行。Ahl注意到公元前7年《文明战争》(Bellum Ciuile)中描述的意大利废墟与公元前9年的特洛伊废墟之间的联系。罗马/意大利和特洛伊在本质上就像消失的神话一样融合在一起,而诗人却让它活着。兹维尔莱因认为凯撒的访问是模仿了近300年前亚历山大大帝的访问。通过这一幕,恺撒被确立为帝国的毁灭者,仅次于亚历山大。奥曼德强调凯撒是特洛伊废墟的权威读者,凯撒读的是《埃涅伊德》而不是《伊利亚特》。罗西同样把重点放在凯撒身上,把特洛伊的废墟解读为对朱利安王朝有利。Gergo用正确的观察打开了这段话,卢坎想到了埃涅阿斯在《埃涅阿斯记》第6章中的katabasis。但是特洛伊之旅与《埃涅伊德》第6章之间的关系更为全面和精确。事实上,这篇文章将对凯撒的旅行进行系统的解释,作为与《埃涅伊德》第6章的平行,卢坎很可能没有给他的角色凯撒提供一个平行的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CAESAR'S ‘VIRGILIAN’ KATABASIS AT TROY IN LUCAN BELLVM CIVILE 9.950–99
Caesar's visit to Troy has always been something of an enigma. Historically, the episode is unattested. Caesar wanders through a congeries of sites at Troy ranging from Ajax's grave on the Rhoetium promontory at its beginning to Priam's Herceian altar at the end. Numerous interpretations have been offered. Bruère has argued for Aeneas' tour through the future site of Rome in Aeneid 8 as a backdrop. Ahl has noted the connection between the ruins of Italy described in Bellum Ciuile (B.C.) 7 and the ruins of Troy in B.C. 9. Rome/Italy and Troy merge in essence as vanishing fabulae, which the poet keeps alive. Zwierlein sees Caesar's visit as modeled on Alexander the Great's visit nearly three hundred years earlier. Caesar through this scene is established as a destroyer of empires, inferior only to Alexander. Ormand stresses Caesar as an authoritative reader of the ruins of Troy, where Caesar reads the Aeneid instead of the Iliad. Rossi similarly focuses on Caesar as reading Troy's ruins to the advantage of the Julian dynasty. Gergo has opened up the passage with the correct observation that Lucan has in mind Aeneas’ katabasis in Aeneid 6. But the relationship between the brief tour at Troy and Aeneid 6 is both more comprehensive and precise. Indeed this essay will present a systematic interpretation of Caesar's tour as a parallel to Aeneid 6 in its entirety, a parallel to which Lucan most likely does not give his character Caesar access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
CONFLICT, TRAGEDY, AND INTERRACIALITY: BOB THOMPSON PAINTS VERGIL'S CAMILLA THE THIRD LIFECYCLE OF PHILOKLEON IN ARISTOPHANES’ WASPS METAGENRE AND THE COMPETENT AUDIENCE OF PLAUTUS’ CAPTIVI ERASING THE AETHIOPIAN IN CICERO'S POST REDITUM IN SENATU RMU volume 51 issue 2 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1