对比GARCH每日方差预测外汇收益和套利交易策略收益

Larissa J. Adamiec, Deborah Cernauskas
{"title":"对比GARCH每日方差预测外汇收益和套利交易策略收益","authors":"Larissa J. Adamiec, Deborah Cernauskas","doi":"10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/11.10.2019/001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"GARCH does a better job predicting carry trade strategy returns than the foreign exchange returns. Using two time periods from 1998-2010 and then from 2010-2018 we find the daily variance to have dropped between period 1 and period 2 for both daily foreign exchange spot prices and daily carry trade strategy returns. Comparing daily spot price returns to daily carry trade strategy returns in each time period we find differences in the sample variances. Daily variance in the foreign exchange market has changed within the last twenty years. As one of the most liquid markets, the FX market has seen significant losses in both spot price returns and carry trade strategy returns. The current market place has historic low levels of volatility. Since the 2008 financial crash asset prices have steadily risen in levels reducing downside risk. In addition, foreign exchange rates have been stable. Given a decade’s worth of slow and steady growth coupled with stabilization has reduced the variance in returns. Popular predictive volatility model GARCH has a long-run variance component. The inclusion of such a parameter allows for the model to remember past financial crisis or “normal” times. Returns in the carry trade are marked by periods of severe downward risk and losses. The carry trade will often have long-term trends of small positive returns only to give back all of the returns in one downward move.","PeriodicalId":31279,"journal":{"name":"Kinerja Journal of Business and Economics","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasting GARCH Daily Variance Predictions Between Foreign Exchange Returns and Carry Trade Strategy Returns\",\"authors\":\"Larissa J. Adamiec, Deborah Cernauskas\",\"doi\":\"10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/11.10.2019/001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"GARCH does a better job predicting carry trade strategy returns than the foreign exchange returns. Using two time periods from 1998-2010 and then from 2010-2018 we find the daily variance to have dropped between period 1 and period 2 for both daily foreign exchange spot prices and daily carry trade strategy returns. Comparing daily spot price returns to daily carry trade strategy returns in each time period we find differences in the sample variances. Daily variance in the foreign exchange market has changed within the last twenty years. As one of the most liquid markets, the FX market has seen significant losses in both spot price returns and carry trade strategy returns. The current market place has historic low levels of volatility. Since the 2008 financial crash asset prices have steadily risen in levels reducing downside risk. In addition, foreign exchange rates have been stable. Given a decade’s worth of slow and steady growth coupled with stabilization has reduced the variance in returns. Popular predictive volatility model GARCH has a long-run variance component. The inclusion of such a parameter allows for the model to remember past financial crisis or “normal” times. Returns in the carry trade are marked by periods of severe downward risk and losses. The carry trade will often have long-term trends of small positive returns only to give back all of the returns in one downward move.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinerja Journal of Business and Economics\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinerja Journal of Business and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/11.10.2019/001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinerja Journal of Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/11.10.2019/001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

GARCH在预测套息交易策略收益方面优于外汇收益。使用1998-2010年和2010-2018年两个时间段,我们发现每日外汇现货价格和每日套利交易策略收益的每日方差在第1期和第2期之间下降。比较每个时间段的每日现货价格收益与每日套利交易策略收益,我们发现样本方差存在差异。在过去的二十年里,外汇市场的日波动已经发生了变化。作为最具流动性的市场之一,外汇市场在现货价格回报和套息交易策略回报方面都出现了重大损失。当前市场的波动性处于历史低位。自2008年金融危机以来,资产价格稳步上涨,下行风险降低。此外,外汇汇率也保持稳定。鉴于十年来缓慢而稳定的增长加上稳定已经减少了回报的差异。流行的预测波动率模型GARCH具有长期方差成分。包含这样一个参数允许模型记住过去的金融危机或“正常”时期。套息交易的回报以严重的下行风险和亏损期为特征。套息交易通常会有小的正收益的长期趋势,但只会在一次下跌中收回所有收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contrasting GARCH Daily Variance Predictions Between Foreign Exchange Returns and Carry Trade Strategy Returns
GARCH does a better job predicting carry trade strategy returns than the foreign exchange returns. Using two time periods from 1998-2010 and then from 2010-2018 we find the daily variance to have dropped between period 1 and period 2 for both daily foreign exchange spot prices and daily carry trade strategy returns. Comparing daily spot price returns to daily carry trade strategy returns in each time period we find differences in the sample variances. Daily variance in the foreign exchange market has changed within the last twenty years. As one of the most liquid markets, the FX market has seen significant losses in both spot price returns and carry trade strategy returns. The current market place has historic low levels of volatility. Since the 2008 financial crash asset prices have steadily risen in levels reducing downside risk. In addition, foreign exchange rates have been stable. Given a decade’s worth of slow and steady growth coupled with stabilization has reduced the variance in returns. Popular predictive volatility model GARCH has a long-run variance component. The inclusion of such a parameter allows for the model to remember past financial crisis or “normal” times. Returns in the carry trade are marked by periods of severe downward risk and losses. The carry trade will often have long-term trends of small positive returns only to give back all of the returns in one downward move.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safety First, Performance Next: Exploring the Interplay between Perceived Safety Climate and Employee Performance Corruption, Development, and Deforestation: An Evidence From Southeast Asian Countries Analysis of Factors Affecting the Economic Growth of the Districts/Cities of West Java Province in 2017-2021 Social Engineering SWOT Analysis in Government-Owned Commercial Banks and National Private Commercial Banks Board Characteristics and Disclosure of Environmental Sustainability Reports in Indonesia: Moderation Effects of Political Connection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1