检察官纠正和防止不公正定罪的权力

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1515/mks-2023-0022
Rebecca Blair, M. Krinsky
{"title":"检察官纠正和防止不公正定罪的权力","authors":"Rebecca Blair, M. Krinsky","doi":"10.1515/mks-2023-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over the past three decades, it has become increasingly clear that the United States’ protections for criminal defendants are insufficient to prevent unjust convictions. The increased availability of DNA testing and surge in exonerations have cast a bright light on the prevalence of wrongful convictions and the systemic factors that drive these errors. Yet, despite increased awareness of these concerns, wrongfully convicted individuals still face tremendous barriers to justice. In order to address these challenges, a growing number of prosecutors have established Conviction Integrity Units (CIUs)We use the term CIU to refer broadly to a unit within a prosecutor’s office dedicated to reviewing wrongful conviction claims, although the official terms used to refer to these units vary by office. For example, these units are sometimes called Conviction Review Units, which can be used interchangeably with CIUs, or Post-Conviction Justice Units, which, as we explain in Section 5, perform the functions of a CIU but include a broader focus. dedicated to reviewing wrongful conviction claims. This work has, over time, informed some prosecutors’ efforts to prevent future wrongful convictions by developing a »just culture« based on shared accountability and continuous improvement. As the movement to address wrongful convictions continues to expand, some prosecutors are beginning to advocate for broader reforms and a holistic vision of post-conviction justice.","PeriodicalId":43577,"journal":{"name":"Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prosecutor’s Power to Correct and Prevent Unjust Convictions\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Blair, M. Krinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/mks-2023-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Over the past three decades, it has become increasingly clear that the United States’ protections for criminal defendants are insufficient to prevent unjust convictions. The increased availability of DNA testing and surge in exonerations have cast a bright light on the prevalence of wrongful convictions and the systemic factors that drive these errors. Yet, despite increased awareness of these concerns, wrongfully convicted individuals still face tremendous barriers to justice. In order to address these challenges, a growing number of prosecutors have established Conviction Integrity Units (CIUs)We use the term CIU to refer broadly to a unit within a prosecutor’s office dedicated to reviewing wrongful conviction claims, although the official terms used to refer to these units vary by office. For example, these units are sometimes called Conviction Review Units, which can be used interchangeably with CIUs, or Post-Conviction Justice Units, which, as we explain in Section 5, perform the functions of a CIU but include a broader focus. dedicated to reviewing wrongful conviction claims. This work has, over time, informed some prosecutors’ efforts to prevent future wrongful convictions by developing a »just culture« based on shared accountability and continuous improvement. As the movement to address wrongful convictions continues to expand, some prosecutors are beginning to advocate for broader reforms and a holistic vision of post-conviction justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2023-0022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2023-0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的三十年中,越来越明显的是,美国对刑事被告的保护不足以防止不公正的定罪。DNA检测的日益普及和无罪释放的激增,让人们对普遍存在的错误定罪以及导致这些错误的系统性因素有了清晰的认识。然而,尽管对这些问题的认识有所提高,但被错误定罪的个人仍然面临巨大的司法障碍。为了应对这些挑战,越来越多的检察官建立了定罪诚信单位(CIU)。我们使用CIU一词泛指检察官办公室内专门审查错误定罪索赔的单位,尽管用于指代这些单位的官方术语因办公室而异。例如,这些单元有时被称为定罪审查单元,可以与CIU或定罪后司法单元互换使用,正如我们在第5节中解释的那样,后者执行CIU的功能,但包括更广泛的焦点。致力于审查错误定罪的索赔。随着时间的推移,这项工作为一些检察官提供了信息,通过建立一种基于共同责任和持续改进的“公正文化”来防止未来的错误定罪。随着解决错误定罪的运动不断扩大,一些检察官开始倡导更广泛的改革和定罪后司法的整体愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prosecutor’s Power to Correct and Prevent Unjust Convictions
Abstract Over the past three decades, it has become increasingly clear that the United States’ protections for criminal defendants are insufficient to prevent unjust convictions. The increased availability of DNA testing and surge in exonerations have cast a bright light on the prevalence of wrongful convictions and the systemic factors that drive these errors. Yet, despite increased awareness of these concerns, wrongfully convicted individuals still face tremendous barriers to justice. In order to address these challenges, a growing number of prosecutors have established Conviction Integrity Units (CIUs)We use the term CIU to refer broadly to a unit within a prosecutor’s office dedicated to reviewing wrongful conviction claims, although the official terms used to refer to these units vary by office. For example, these units are sometimes called Conviction Review Units, which can be used interchangeably with CIUs, or Post-Conviction Justice Units, which, as we explain in Section 5, perform the functions of a CIU but include a broader focus. dedicated to reviewing wrongful conviction claims. This work has, over time, informed some prosecutors’ efforts to prevent future wrongful convictions by developing a »just culture« based on shared accountability and continuous improvement. As the movement to address wrongful convictions continues to expand, some prosecutors are beginning to advocate for broader reforms and a holistic vision of post-conviction justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
58. Kolloquium der Südwestdeutschen und Schweizerischen Kriminologischen Institute und Lehrstühle – Tagungsbericht Sig Sauers Rüstungsexporte nach Kolumbien: eine Fallanalyse organisationaler Devianz Threats to Scientifically Based Standards in Sex Offense Proceedings: Progress and the Interests of Alleged Victims in Jeopardy Frontmatter Vorurteilskriminalität vor Gericht – die Berücksichtigung von rassistischen, fremdenfeindlichen, antisemitischen oder sonstigen menschenverachtenden Zielen und Beweggründen gem. § 46 Abs. 2 S. 2 StGB im Rahmen der Strafzumessung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1