对使用实物期权定价模型评估房地产项目和合同的批评

Pete H. Oppenheimer Ph.D
{"title":"对使用实物期权定价模型评估房地产项目和合同的批评","authors":"Pete H. Oppenheimer Ph.D","doi":"10.1002/bref.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Discounted cash flow (DCF) models have been criticised for using risky discount rates and subjective estimates of future cash flows. In addition, DCF models do not incorporate valuations of implicit options imbedded in capital projects. Recently, researchers have applied real options pricing models to evaluate real estate projects and contracts. However, the required assumptions and criteria for using these models may be absent in real estate projects, which raises the question whether these models produce better results or create more uncertainties for end users. This paper contains a review of the conditions and methods that have been proposed for applying real option models in real estate valuations. Copyright © 2002 Henry Stewart Publications</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"2 3","pages":"221-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.69","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critique of using real options pricing models in valuing real estate projects and contracts\",\"authors\":\"Pete H. Oppenheimer Ph.D\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bref.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Discounted cash flow (DCF) models have been criticised for using risky discount rates and subjective estimates of future cash flows. In addition, DCF models do not incorporate valuations of implicit options imbedded in capital projects. Recently, researchers have applied real options pricing models to evaluate real estate projects and contracts. However, the required assumptions and criteria for using these models may be absent in real estate projects, which raises the question whether these models produce better results or create more uncertainties for end users. This paper contains a review of the conditions and methods that have been proposed for applying real option models in real estate valuations. Copyright © 2002 Henry Stewart Publications</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Briefings in Real Estate Finance\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"221-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.69\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Briefings in Real Estate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

贴现现金流量(DCF)模型因使用风险折现率和对未来现金流量的主观估计而受到批评。此外,DCF模型不包括资本项目中隐含期权的估值。近年来,研究人员将实物期权定价模型应用于房地产项目和合同的评估。然而,在房地产项目中可能缺乏使用这些模型所需的假设和标准,这就提出了这些模型是产生更好的结果还是为最终用户带来更多不确定性的问题。本文综述了在房地产估价中应用实物期权模型的条件和方法。版权所有©2002 Henry Stewart Publications
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critique of using real options pricing models in valuing real estate projects and contracts

Discounted cash flow (DCF) models have been criticised for using risky discount rates and subjective estimates of future cash flows. In addition, DCF models do not incorporate valuations of implicit options imbedded in capital projects. Recently, researchers have applied real options pricing models to evaluate real estate projects and contracts. However, the required assumptions and criteria for using these models may be absent in real estate projects, which raises the question whether these models produce better results or create more uncertainties for end users. This paper contains a review of the conditions and methods that have been proposed for applying real option models in real estate valuations. Copyright © 2002 Henry Stewart Publications

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in quantifying risk in commercial real estate lending Leverage in real estate investments: an optimization approach Holding period effect and home price indexes: a dynamic analysis Top 10 securitizable loan negotiations† Real estate loan delinquency, property prices and alternative income opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1