首页 > 最新文献

Briefings in Real Estate Finance最新文献

英文 中文
Leverage in real estate investments: an optimization approach 房地产投资中的杠杆作用:一种优化方法
Pub Date : 2008-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/bref.163
Nick Tyrrell, Jesse Bostwick

Real estate investments are frequently leveraged. Leverage is an important tool for any real estate investor whose target return exceeds the expected return on core, unleveraged assets, since it can increase potential returns – although at the cost of increasing risk. It therefore competes with other means of raising risk and returns – in particular, buying riskier underlying investments – as a method of improving the performance of a portfolio. From a theoretical perspective, leverage should be preferred so long as the marginal increase in expected return per unit of extra risk from leverage exceeds that obtained from buying riskier assets. Since there are diminishing returns to leverage – primarily because costs rise as borrowing levels rise relative to value – this trade-off will become less attractive as leverage rises, leading to an equilibrium optimal level of leverage. If all investors face the same opportunity set, then, from a theoretical perspective, all investors should leverage core investments up to this level so long as their return target is at least as high as the returns generated at this equilibrium point – a conclusion that is out of line with current practice. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to measure this equilibrium point, since, while it is relatively straightforward to compute the increase in risks and returns deriving from leverage, rather little is known about the risk/return trade-off in real estate space. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

房地产投资经常是杠杆化的。对于那些目标收益超过核心非杠杆资产预期收益的房地产投资者来说,杠杆是一个重要的工具,因为它可以增加潜在收益——尽管代价是风险增加。因此,作为一种改善投资组合业绩的方法,它与其他提高风险和回报的手段——特别是购买风险较高的基础投资——展开竞争。从理论上讲,只要单位额外风险的预期收益边际增长超过购买风险资产的边际增长,就应该优先使用杠杆。由于杠杆的收益递减——主要是因为成本随着借贷水平相对于价值的上升而上升——随着杠杆的上升,这种权衡将变得不那么有吸引力,从而导致均衡的最优杠杆水平。如果所有投资者都面临相同的机会集,那么,从理论的角度来看,只要他们的回报目标至少与这个平衡点产生的回报一样高,所有投资者都应该将核心投资杠杆化到这个水平——这一结论与当前的实践不符。不幸的是,衡量这个平衡点是非常困难的,因为虽然计算杠杆带来的风险和回报的增加相对简单,但对房地产领域的风险/回报权衡知之甚少。版权所有©2008 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Leverage in real estate investments: an optimization approach","authors":"Nick Tyrrell,&nbsp;Jesse Bostwick","doi":"10.1002/bref.163","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.163","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Real estate investments are frequently leveraged. Leverage is an important tool for any real estate investor whose target return exceeds the expected return on core, unleveraged assets, since it can increase potential returns – although at the cost of increasing risk. It therefore competes with other means of raising risk and returns – in particular, buying riskier underlying investments – as a method of improving the performance of a portfolio. From a theoretical perspective, leverage should be preferred so long as the marginal increase in expected return per unit of extra risk from leverage exceeds that obtained from buying riskier assets. Since there are diminishing returns to leverage – primarily because costs rise as borrowing levels rise relative to value – this trade-off will become less attractive as leverage rises, leading to an equilibrium optimal level of leverage. If all investors face the same opportunity set, then, from a theoretical perspective, all investors should leverage core investments up to this level so long as their return target is at least as high as the returns generated at this equilibrium point – a conclusion that is out of line with current practice. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to measure this equilibrium point, since, while it is relatively straightforward to compute the increase in risks and returns deriving from leverage, rather little is known about the risk/return trade-off in real estate space. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"143-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.163","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76322597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Advances in quantifying risk in commercial real estate lending 商业房地产贷款风险量化研究进展
Pub Date : 2008-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/bref.161
Chris Marrison

There are strong forces in the commercial real estate industry pushing banks and investors to take more quantitative approaches in assessing risks. This quantification will affect everything from loan approvals to deal structures and loan pricing. There are four main drivers for the use of quantitative tools: 1) The Basel II regulations that require banks to have risk models to calculate their minimum capital requirements; 2) The pressure to increase returns by using more complex financial structures; 3) The need to ensure that senior managers can monitor the effect of these complex structures on the risk of the portfolio; and 4) Concern that the world has become more interlinked, increasing the risk of several sectors melting down simultaneously. This article discusses some of the ways that risk can be measured, the requirements of the new regulations and how risk measurement tools can be used to increase profitability and reduce risk in structuring new deals. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

商业地产行业有一股强大的力量在推动银行和投资者在评估风险时采取更多的量化方法。这种量化将影响从贷款审批到交易结构和贷款定价等方方面面。使用量化工具有四个主要驱动因素:1)巴塞尔协议II要求银行建立风险模型来计算其最低资本要求;2)通过使用更复杂的金融结构来提高回报的压力;3)需要确保高级管理人员能够监控这些复杂结构对投资组合风险的影响;4)担心世界变得更加相互联系,增加了多个行业同时崩溃的风险。本文讨论了一些可以度量风险的方法、新法规的要求以及如何使用风险度量工具来提高盈利能力并降低构建新交易的风险。版权所有©2008 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Advances in quantifying risk in commercial real estate lending","authors":"Chris Marrison","doi":"10.1002/bref.161","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.161","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are strong forces in the commercial real estate industry pushing banks and investors to take more quantitative approaches in assessing risks. This quantification will affect everything from loan approvals to deal structures and loan pricing. There are four main drivers for the use of quantitative tools: 1) The Basel II regulations that require banks to have risk models to calculate their minimum capital requirements; 2) The pressure to increase returns by using more complex financial structures; 3) The need to ensure that senior managers can monitor the effect of these complex structures on the risk of the portfolio; and 4) Concern that the world has become more interlinked, increasing the risk of several sectors melting down simultaneously. This article discusses some of the ways that risk can be measured, the requirements of the new regulations and how risk measurement tools can be used to increase profitability and reduce risk in structuring new deals. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"135-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.161","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75755100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Holding period effect and home price indexes: a dynamic analysis 持有期效应与房价指数的动态分析
Pub Date : 2008-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/bref.160
Ling T. He

Four major home price indexes have been used in this study, and are based on different calculation methods and from different sources. The descriptive statistics indicate no meaningful differences among them. However, by analysing the orthogonalized impulse response and variance decomposition matrixes from the vector autoregressions, this study found some noticeable differences in the dynamic relationships between these indexes and three other housing factors – mortgage rates, existing home sales and new home sales – in addition to the inflation factor. The results may reflect the holding period effect in repeat sales house price indexes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

本研究使用了四种主要的房价指数,并且基于不同的计算方法和不同的来源。描述性统计表明,两者之间无显著差异。然而,通过分析矢量自回归的正交化脉冲响应和方差分解矩阵,本研究发现这些指标与其他三个住房因素-抵押贷款利率,现房销售和新房销售-以及通货膨胀因素之间的动态关系存在一些显著差异。结果可能反映了重复销售房价指数的持有期效应。版权所有©2008 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Holding period effect and home price indexes: a dynamic analysis","authors":"Ling T. He","doi":"10.1002/bref.160","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.160","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Four major home price indexes have been used in this study, and are based on different calculation methods and from different sources. The descriptive statistics indicate no meaningful differences among them. However, by analysing the orthogonalized impulse response and variance decomposition matrixes from the vector autoregressions, this study found some noticeable differences in the dynamic relationships between these indexes and three other housing factors – mortgage rates, existing home sales and new home sales – in addition to the inflation factor. The results may reflect the holding period effect in repeat sales house price indexes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"115-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.160","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76879372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Top 10 securitizable loan negotiations† 十大证券化贷款谈判†
Pub Date : 2008-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/bref.162
Gregory P. Pressman

From a borrower's point of view, what drives many loan negotiations is a tension between, on the one hand, the attractive pricing that the liquidity of the capital markets enables securitizing lenders to offer (when compared with their portfolio lender competition), versus, on the other hand, added up-front structuring requirements and increased ongoing ‘policing’ of and constraints on the borrower's property operations, compounded by the arguably less-responsive servicing that borrowers occasionally view as the price of doing real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC)-destined deals. This first part of the series highlights key issues regarding (1) matters that set the tone for subsequent negotiations by influencing the parties' relative negotiating leverage from early stages of the deal; (2) the extent of and limits on pre-funding due diligence and (similarly) life-of-loan monitoring; (3) the non-recourse carveouts; (4) transfer restrictions; and (5) bankruptcy remoteness. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

从借款人的角度来看,推动许多贷款谈判的是一种紧张关系,一方面,资本市场的流动性使证券化贷款人能够提供有吸引力的定价(与他们的组合贷款人竞争相比),另一方面,增加了前期结构要求,并增加了对借款人财产运营的持续“监管”和限制。更糟糕的是,借款人有时会将服务反应迟钝视为进行房地产抵押贷款投资渠道(REMIC)交易的代价。本系列的第一部分重点介绍以下关键问题:(1)通过影响交易早期各方的相对谈判杠杆,为后续谈判奠定基调的事项;(2)融资前尽职调查和(类似的)贷款期限监控的范围和限制;(三)无追索权的免责;(四)转让限制;(5)远离破产。版权所有©2008 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Top 10 securitizable loan negotiations†","authors":"Gregory P. Pressman","doi":"10.1002/bref.162","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.162","url":null,"abstract":"<p>From a borrower's point of view, what drives many loan negotiations is a tension between, on the one hand, the attractive pricing that the liquidity of the capital markets enables securitizing lenders to offer (when compared with their portfolio lender competition), versus, on the other hand, added up-front structuring requirements and increased ongoing ‘policing’ of and constraints on the borrower's property operations, compounded by the arguably less-responsive servicing that borrowers occasionally view as the price of doing real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC)-destined deals. This first part of the series highlights key issues regarding (1) matters that set the tone for subsequent negotiations by influencing the parties' relative negotiating leverage from early stages of the deal; (2) the extent of and limits on pre-funding due diligence and (similarly) life-of-loan monitoring; (3) the non-recourse carveouts; (4) transfer restrictions; and (5) bankruptcy remoteness. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.162","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"93572544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Real estate loan delinquency, property prices and alternative income opportunities 房地产贷款拖欠,房地产价格和替代收入的机会
Pub Date : 2007-06-28 DOI: 10.1002/bref.159
Billie Ann Brotman

Evidence is shown, using US real estate default data from 1987–2004, that high default rates on mortgages are associated with prior period housing prices, rental income, inflation-adjusted household median income and interest rate fluctuations. This paper investigates the proposition: that the percentage of real estate defaults is a function of alternative income opportunities. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

根据1987-2004年美国房地产违约数据显示,抵押贷款的高违约率与前期房价、租金收入、经通胀调整后的家庭收入中位数和利率波动有关。本文研究了房地产违约率是可选择收入机会的函数这一命题。版权所有©2007 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Real estate loan delinquency, property prices and alternative income opportunities","authors":"Billie Ann Brotman","doi":"10.1002/bref.159","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.159","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evidence is shown, using US real estate default data from 1987–2004, that high default rates on mortgages are associated with prior period housing prices, rental income, inflation-adjusted household median income and interest rate fluctuations. This paper investigates the proposition: that the percentage of real estate defaults is a function of alternative income opportunities. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.159","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74904823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Theta model forecasts of quarterly and monthly dwelling prices in the UK Theta模型预测了英国季度和月度住宅价格
Pub Date : 2007-06-28 DOI: 10.1002/bref.158
Elli Pagourtzi, Vassilis Assimakopoulos, Akrivi Litsa

The current paper is an expansion of the paper ‘Theta Model Forecasts Real Estate Values’, presented at the European Real Estate Society (ERES) Conference, 2006. In the former paper, the Theta method was compared with other forecasting methods in forecasting quarterly housing prices in the UK. The theta method had then produced the best forecasts, on average, with the smallest mean errors. Additional data are used here, representing the total average dwelling prices in the UK, and are organized into months, from January 1983 up to September 2006. This paper examines the present state of the UK housing market and tests the theta method on the new monthly data. The time-series data used for forecasting are again provided from the Halifax House Price Index, and cover different categories of buyers (all, first-time buyers and home movers) and houses (all, new and existing). Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

当前的论文是在2006年欧洲房地产协会(ERES)会议上发表的论文“Theta模型预测房地产价值”的扩展。在前一篇论文中,Theta方法与其他预测方法在预测英国季度房价方面进行了比较。平均而言,θ方法产生了最好的预测,平均误差最小。这里使用了额外的数据,代表了英国的总平均住宅价格,并按月组织,从1983年1月到2006年9月。本文考察了英国房地产市场的现状,并在新的月度数据上测试了theta方法。用于预测的时间序列数据再次来自哈利法克斯房价指数,涵盖了不同类别的买家(所有,首次购房者和搬家者)和房屋(所有,新房和现房)。版权所有©2007 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Theta model forecasts of quarterly and monthly dwelling prices in the UK","authors":"Elli Pagourtzi,&nbsp;Vassilis Assimakopoulos,&nbsp;Akrivi Litsa","doi":"10.1002/bref.158","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.158","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current paper is an expansion of the paper ‘Theta Model Forecasts Real Estate Values’, presented at the European Real Estate Society (ERES) Conference, 2006. In the former paper, the Theta method was compared with other forecasting methods in forecasting quarterly housing prices in the UK. The theta method had then produced the best forecasts, on average, with the smallest mean errors. Additional data are used here, representing the total average dwelling prices in the UK, and are organized into months, from January 1983 up to September 2006. This paper examines the present state of the UK housing market and tests the theta method on the new monthly data. The time-series data used for forecasting are again provided from the Halifax House Price Index, and cover different categories of buyers (all, first-time buyers and home movers) and houses (all, new and existing). Copyright © 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"75-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.158","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78488006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Mezzanine participations 夹层参与
Pub Date : 2007-03-29 DOI: 10.1002/bref.154
Carson Leonard

In April of 2005, one of the architectural icons of the New York City skyline, the Met Life Building, on Park Avenue above Grand Central Terminal, was purchased by an affiliate of one of the leading real estate companies in the USA, Tishman–Speyer. Designed by Emery Roth and Walter Gropius, the building now boasts some of the highest asking rents in Manhattan. The acquisition financing for this transaction was originated by a leading investment bank and was structured to include a mortgage loan and three mezzanine loans. The mortgage loan was carved into a number of pieces and sold in several securitization transactions. Through participation and servicing agreements put in place by the originator, the mezzanine loans were each carved into participations and sold off in a series of transactions to a variety of institutional investors. This transaction is an example of the critical role that mezzanine financing has come to play in large real estate financings over the past half-decade. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

2005年4月,纽约天际线的标志性建筑之一,位于中央车站上方的公园大道上的大都会人寿大厦,被美国领先的房地产公司之一铁狮门-斯派尔的子公司收购。由埃默里·罗斯(Emery Roth)和沃尔特·格罗皮乌斯(Walter Gropius)设计的这座建筑,现在是曼哈顿要价最高的建筑之一。此次交易的收购融资是由一家领先的投资银行发起的,其结构包括抵押贷款和三笔夹层贷款。抵押贷款被分割成许多部分,并在几次证券化交易中出售。通过发起人制定的参与协议和服务协议,夹层贷款被分割成参与协议,并在一系列交易中出售给各种机构投资者。这笔交易是夹层融资在过去5年里在大型房地产融资中发挥关键作用的一个例子。版权所有©2005 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Mezzanine participations","authors":"Carson Leonard","doi":"10.1002/bref.154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bref.154","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In April of 2005, one of the architectural icons of the New York City skyline, the Met Life Building, on Park Avenue above Grand Central Terminal, was purchased by an affiliate of one of the leading real estate companies in the USA, Tishman–Speyer. Designed by Emery Roth and Walter Gropius, the building now boasts some of the highest asking rents in Manhattan. The acquisition financing for this transaction was originated by a leading investment bank and was structured to include a mortgage loan and three mezzanine loans. The mortgage loan was carved into a number of pieces and sold in several securitization transactions. Through participation and servicing agreements put in place by the originator, the mezzanine loans were each carved into participations and sold off in a series of transactions to a variety of institutional investors. This transaction is an example of the critical role that mezzanine financing has come to play in large real estate financings over the past half-decade. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 1-2","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.154","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137724366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do real estate mutual funds enhance portfolio returns and reduce portfolio risk? 房地产共同基金能提高投资组合收益并降低投资组合风险吗?
Pub Date : 2007-03-29 DOI: 10.1002/bref.157
Nell S. Gullett, Arnold L. Redman

This study examines both the determinants of risk-adjusted returns of real estate mutual funds relative to that of five categories of equity mutual funds and the systematic risk/return impacts on mutual fund portfolios when combined with real estate mutual funds. We find that there are three variables that are significant in affecting risk-adjusted returns of real estate mutual funds: correlation with stock market returns, expense ratio and tax efficiency. Real estate funds with returns that have a greater association with stock market returns would have larger risk-adjusted returns. Low tax efficiency and larger expense ratios would lead to reduced risk-adjusted returns. This study provides evidence of the positive risk/return impacts of including real estate mutual funds in a portfolio of equity mutual funds. Combining real estate mutual funds into equally weighted portfolios with non-real estate mutual funds would have increased portfolio returns while decreasing portfolio beta. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

本研究考察了房地产共同基金相对于五类股票共同基金的风险调整收益的决定因素,以及与房地产共同基金结合时对共同基金投资组合的系统性风险/收益影响。我们发现有三个变量显著影响房地产共同基金的风险调整收益:与股市收益的相关性、费用率和税收效率。回报率与股市回报率关联较大的房地产基金,其风险调整后的回报率会更高。低税收效率和较高的费用率将导致风险调整后的回报降低。本研究提供了将房地产共同基金纳入股票共同基金组合的积极风险/回报影响的证据。将房地产共同基金与非房地产共同基金合并成同等权重的投资组合,将增加投资组合的回报,同时降低投资组合的贝塔系数。版权所有©2005 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Do real estate mutual funds enhance portfolio returns and reduce portfolio risk?","authors":"Nell S. Gullett,&nbsp;Arnold L. Redman","doi":"10.1002/bref.157","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.157","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines both the determinants of risk-adjusted returns of real estate mutual funds relative to that of five categories of equity mutual funds and the systematic risk/return impacts on mutual fund portfolios when combined with real estate mutual funds. We find that there are three variables that are significant in affecting risk-adjusted returns of real estate mutual funds: correlation with stock market returns, expense ratio and tax efficiency. Real estate funds with returns that have a greater association with stock market returns would have larger risk-adjusted returns. Low tax efficiency and larger expense ratios would lead to reduced risk-adjusted returns. This study provides evidence of the positive risk/return impacts of including real estate mutual funds in a portfolio of equity mutual funds. Combining real estate mutual funds into equally weighted portfolios with non-real estate mutual funds would have increased portfolio returns while decreasing portfolio beta. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 1-2","pages":"51-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.157","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87952711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Renewed interest in hotel investment: white paper 酒店投资兴趣重燃:白皮书
Pub Date : 2007-03-29 DOI: 10.1002/bref.156
Brian Lee

As the world's largest industry, tourism is becoming increasingly global and places greater demands on the hotel trade.

Tourist traffic had increased by 30% over the last five years, according to the World Tourism Organisation, and will shortly exceed one billion tourist arrivals per annum.

Greater demand for hotel accommodation coupled with increasing separation of ownership and management has placed the hotel sector firmly in the investment spotlight.

The following article explains why. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作为世界上最大的产业,旅游业日益全球化,对酒店业提出了更高的要求。根据世界旅游组织的数据,在过去的五年里,旅游客流量增长了30%,每年的游客人数将很快超过10亿。对酒店住宿需求的增加,加上所有权和经营权日益分离,使酒店行业牢牢地成为投资焦点。下面的文章解释了其中的原因。版权所有©2005 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Renewed interest in hotel investment: white paper","authors":"Brian Lee","doi":"10.1002/bref.156","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.156","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the world's largest industry, tourism is becoming increasingly global and places greater demands on the hotel trade.</p><p>Tourist traffic had increased by 30% over the last five years, according to the World Tourism Organisation, and will shortly exceed one billion tourist arrivals per annum.</p><p>Greater demand for hotel accommodation coupled with increasing separation of ownership and management has placed the hotel sector firmly in the investment spotlight.</p><p>The following article explains why. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 1-2","pages":"47-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.156","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"97846320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do real estate assets hedge inflation better than financial assets? Some New Zealand evidence 房地产资产是否比金融资产更能对冲通胀?一些新西兰的证据
Pub Date : 2007-03-29 DOI: 10.1002/bref.155
Ting Ting Zhou, Abeyratna Gunasekarage, David M. Power

This study examined the effectiveness of real estate assets in hedging inflation; financial assets are also analysed for the purpose of comparison. The real estate assets classes examined include residential, commercial, industrial and farm buildings, whereas the financial assets classes include stocks, short-term government bonds and long-term government bonds. The rate of inflation is proxied by the change in consumer price index. The findings revealed that all four types of real estate assets provide a partial hedge against actual inflation. However, their financial counterparts failed to provide any hedge against inflation. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

本研究考察了房地产资产对冲通胀的有效性;为了进行比较,还对金融资产进行了分析。研究的房地产资产类别包括住宅、商业、工业和农场建筑,而金融资产类别包括股票、短期政府债券和长期政府债券。通货膨胀率由消费者价格指数的变化来表示。研究结果显示,所有四种类型的房地产资产都能部分对冲实际通胀。然而,他们的金融同行未能提供任何对冲通胀的措施。版权所有©2005 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
{"title":"Do real estate assets hedge inflation better than financial assets? Some New Zealand evidence","authors":"Ting Ting Zhou,&nbsp;Abeyratna Gunasekarage,&nbsp;David M. Power","doi":"10.1002/bref.155","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bref.155","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the effectiveness of real estate assets in hedging inflation; financial assets are also analysed for the purpose of comparison. The real estate assets classes examined include residential, commercial, industrial and farm buildings, whereas the financial assets classes include stocks, short-term government bonds and long-term government bonds. The rate of inflation is proxied by the change in consumer price index. The findings revealed that all four types of real estate assets provide a partial hedge against actual inflation. However, their financial counterparts failed to provide any hedge against inflation. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"5 1-2","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.155","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81780440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
期刊
Briefings in Real Estate Finance
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1