国家法与习惯法的关系动态:尤拉亚特土地权利承认研究

S. Sukirno, M. Mahfud
{"title":"国家法与习惯法的关系动态:尤拉亚特土地权利承认研究","authors":"S. Sukirno, M. Mahfud","doi":"10.24815/kanun.v24i3.25367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recognition of ulayat rights is essential in fulfilling indigenous people’s rights. However, the Indonesian government has not fully recognized their rights. This research aims at analyzing the recognition of ulayat right from the Dutch colonial, reformation to the Job Creation Law periods. This is doctrinal legal research focusing on relevant literature. Data are analyzed qualitatively. The research shows that during the Dutch occupation, it is ruled in Agrarisch Wet 1870 followed by Agrarisch Bestluit regulating all lands without provable rights belonging to the state (domein verklaring). Post Indonesia’s independence, Basic Agrarian Law eliminates the Domain Principle and replaces it with State Authoritative Right under Article 33 paragraph (3) of Indonesia’s Constitution. Nowadays, ulayat rights are conditionally recognizable, known as pseudo-recognition. The recognition of indigenous people in the reformation era and post-enactment of the Job Creation Law is too minimal and it strengthens the state’s right over the land.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RELATIONAL DYNAMICS OF STATE LAW AND CUSTOMARY LAW: A STUDY OF THE ULAYAT LAND RIGHTS RECOGNITION\",\"authors\":\"S. Sukirno, M. Mahfud\",\"doi\":\"10.24815/kanun.v24i3.25367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recognition of ulayat rights is essential in fulfilling indigenous people’s rights. However, the Indonesian government has not fully recognized their rights. This research aims at analyzing the recognition of ulayat right from the Dutch colonial, reformation to the Job Creation Law periods. This is doctrinal legal research focusing on relevant literature. Data are analyzed qualitatively. The research shows that during the Dutch occupation, it is ruled in Agrarisch Wet 1870 followed by Agrarisch Bestluit regulating all lands without provable rights belonging to the state (domein verklaring). Post Indonesia’s independence, Basic Agrarian Law eliminates the Domain Principle and replaces it with State Authoritative Right under Article 33 paragraph (3) of Indonesia’s Constitution. Nowadays, ulayat rights are conditionally recognizable, known as pseudo-recognition. The recognition of indigenous people in the reformation era and post-enactment of the Job Creation Law is too minimal and it strengthens the state’s right over the land.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v24i3.25367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v24i3.25367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

承认乌拉亚特权利对于实现土著人民的权利至关重要。然而,印尼政府并没有完全承认他们的权利。本研究旨在分析荷兰殖民时期、宗教改革时期到《创造就业法》时期对乌拉亚特权的认识。这是一项以相关文献为重点的理论法学研究。对数据进行定性分析。研究表明,在荷兰占领期间,它是在1870年的Agrarisch Wet中统治的,随后是Agrarisch Bestluit,规定了所有没有可证明的权利属于国家的土地(domein verklaring)。印度尼西亚独立后,《基本土地法》取消了领域原则,代之以《印度尼西亚宪法》第33条第(3)款规定的国家权威权。如今,乌拉特权利是有条件承认的,被称为伪承认。改革时期和《创造就业法》颁布后对原住民的承认过少,强化了国家对土地的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RELATIONAL DYNAMICS OF STATE LAW AND CUSTOMARY LAW: A STUDY OF THE ULAYAT LAND RIGHTS RECOGNITION
The recognition of ulayat rights is essential in fulfilling indigenous people’s rights. However, the Indonesian government has not fully recognized their rights. This research aims at analyzing the recognition of ulayat right from the Dutch colonial, reformation to the Job Creation Law periods. This is doctrinal legal research focusing on relevant literature. Data are analyzed qualitatively. The research shows that during the Dutch occupation, it is ruled in Agrarisch Wet 1870 followed by Agrarisch Bestluit regulating all lands without provable rights belonging to the state (domein verklaring). Post Indonesia’s independence, Basic Agrarian Law eliminates the Domain Principle and replaces it with State Authoritative Right under Article 33 paragraph (3) of Indonesia’s Constitution. Nowadays, ulayat rights are conditionally recognizable, known as pseudo-recognition. The recognition of indigenous people in the reformation era and post-enactment of the Job Creation Law is too minimal and it strengthens the state’s right over the land.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM SENGKETA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG ANTINOMI SANKSI DENDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PAJAK TINGKAT KEBERATAN DAN BANDING KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL PUTUSAN PTUN (ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PTUN PADA KASUS PERIZINAN PERTAMBANGAN PT. TMS) PEMENUHAN HAK KHUSUS BAGI NARAPIDANA PEREMPUAN HAMIL YANG MENJALANI MASA TUNGGU HUKUMAN MATI DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 PEMBUKTIAN UNSUR MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM DELIK NARKOTIKA SECARA TERORGANISASI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1