协作架构:合作伙伴影响的组件、关系和含义

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Perspectives on Public Management and Governance Pub Date : 2023-02-04 DOI:10.1093/ppmgov/gvac027
Stephen B Page, M. Stone
{"title":"协作架构:合作伙伴影响的组件、关系和含义","authors":"Stephen B Page, M. Stone","doi":"10.1093/ppmgov/gvac027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article provides a detailed exploration of the collaborative architecture concept and its ability to deepen research on interorganizational collaborative arrangements. After introducing four components of collaborative architecture (goals, arenas, membership, and mechanisms), the article uses the components to compare two cases of public education reform collaborations. We investigate methodological challenges in coding and data analysis and evaluate the conceptual strengths and weaknesses of collaborative architecture, including the extent to which it lends specificity to existing frameworks for studying collaboration and collaborative governance. The article demonstrates that the collaborative architecture concept enables researchers to probe and assess important characteristics and relationships among goals, boundaries, structures, and processes of interorganizational collaboration as well as the exercise and embeddedness of partner influence.","PeriodicalId":29947,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Architecture: Components, Relationships, and Implications for Partner Influence\",\"authors\":\"Stephen B Page, M. Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ppmgov/gvac027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article provides a detailed exploration of the collaborative architecture concept and its ability to deepen research on interorganizational collaborative arrangements. After introducing four components of collaborative architecture (goals, arenas, membership, and mechanisms), the article uses the components to compare two cases of public education reform collaborations. We investigate methodological challenges in coding and data analysis and evaluate the conceptual strengths and weaknesses of collaborative architecture, including the extent to which it lends specificity to existing frameworks for studying collaboration and collaborative governance. The article demonstrates that the collaborative architecture concept enables researchers to probe and assess important characteristics and relationships among goals, boundaries, structures, and processes of interorganizational collaboration as well as the exercise and embeddedness of partner influence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文详细探讨了协作架构的概念及其对深化组织间协作安排研究的能力。在介绍了协作体系结构的四个组成部分(目标、领域、成员和机制)之后,本文使用这些组成部分来比较公共教育改革协作的两个案例。我们调查了编码和数据分析中的方法论挑战,并评估了协作架构的概念优势和劣势,包括它在多大程度上为研究协作和协作治理的现有框架提供了特殊性。本文表明,协作架构概念使研究人员能够探索和评估组织间协作的重要特征和目标、边界、结构和过程之间的关系,以及伙伴影响的行使和嵌入性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Architecture: Components, Relationships, and Implications for Partner Influence
This article provides a detailed exploration of the collaborative architecture concept and its ability to deepen research on interorganizational collaborative arrangements. After introducing four components of collaborative architecture (goals, arenas, membership, and mechanisms), the article uses the components to compare two cases of public education reform collaborations. We investigate methodological challenges in coding and data analysis and evaluate the conceptual strengths and weaknesses of collaborative architecture, including the extent to which it lends specificity to existing frameworks for studying collaboration and collaborative governance. The article demonstrates that the collaborative architecture concept enables researchers to probe and assess important characteristics and relationships among goals, boundaries, structures, and processes of interorganizational collaboration as well as the exercise and embeddedness of partner influence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Not Whether to Coordinate, But How: Concerns and Mechanism Choice Under a Mandate for Inter-Agency Coordination What Is The Public? A Pragmatic Analysis of a Core Concept in Public Administration The Flawed Foundations of Social Equity in Public Administration: A Racial Contract Theory Critique The Procedural Politicking Tug of War: Law-Versus-Management Disputes in Contexts of Democratic Backsliding Producing Agreements and Innovations in Collaborative Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1