{"title":"超大型富凝析气顶油藏协同开发研究","authors":"Yulia Ziablitckaia, A. Sharif, M. Abdou","doi":"10.2118/197200-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Conventional strategy for developing of giant oil reservoirs with a gas cap involves an optimal production from the oil column before the gas cap is blown down. This paper investigates technical aspects of co-development strategies where demand for the gas may entail earlier exploitation of the gas cap along with the existing oil column development.\n Co-development of giant reservoirs with condensate-rich gas cap are particularly challenging due to the presence of significant condensate volumes. The basic strategy of the co-development plan involves producing from a gas cap first under full gas recycling so as to accelerate condensate recovery. This is followed by sales gas production by means of partial gas recycling in conjunction with water injection at gas-oil contact for pressure maintenance purposes. The injection of water at gas-oil contact is intended to provide a water barrier or fence that separates and / or minimize gas cap expansion toward oil. The degree at which sales gas is produced is under pressure maintenance scheme is thus linked to the level of the partial gas recycling and the efficiency of the barrier or fence water injection.\n To explore the feasibility of this process, reservoir simulations of mechanistic models were first used to study the reservoir physics of water injection at gas-oil contact for the purpose creating water barrier and /or fence. This was followed by implementation of the co-development scheme using sector models that represent two giant carbonate gas cap reservoirs. The feasibility and merits of the co-development strategy were measured by performance metrics that include condensate recovery, sales gas production, minimum oil loss and fluid migration at gas-oil contact and overall water demand.\n The results show that partial recycling along with barrier water injection may provide a mechanism for concurrent gas cap and oil column exploitation. A key factor that underlies the success of the co-development plan is the ability of the water injection at gas-oil contact to recover potential pressure drop in time as gas recycling ratio is reduced by forming effective barrier. This, in turn depends mainly on the reservoir geology and water injection volume and scheme. Moreover, reservoir characteristics that are favorable to the process are lower formation dip angle, smaller surface area at fluid contact and good injectivity of the reservoir rock.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Development Aspects of Super Giant Reservoirs With Condensate-Rich Gas Cap\",\"authors\":\"Yulia Ziablitckaia, A. Sharif, M. Abdou\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197200-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Conventional strategy for developing of giant oil reservoirs with a gas cap involves an optimal production from the oil column before the gas cap is blown down. This paper investigates technical aspects of co-development strategies where demand for the gas may entail earlier exploitation of the gas cap along with the existing oil column development.\\n Co-development of giant reservoirs with condensate-rich gas cap are particularly challenging due to the presence of significant condensate volumes. The basic strategy of the co-development plan involves producing from a gas cap first under full gas recycling so as to accelerate condensate recovery. This is followed by sales gas production by means of partial gas recycling in conjunction with water injection at gas-oil contact for pressure maintenance purposes. The injection of water at gas-oil contact is intended to provide a water barrier or fence that separates and / or minimize gas cap expansion toward oil. The degree at which sales gas is produced is under pressure maintenance scheme is thus linked to the level of the partial gas recycling and the efficiency of the barrier or fence water injection.\\n To explore the feasibility of this process, reservoir simulations of mechanistic models were first used to study the reservoir physics of water injection at gas-oil contact for the purpose creating water barrier and /or fence. This was followed by implementation of the co-development scheme using sector models that represent two giant carbonate gas cap reservoirs. The feasibility and merits of the co-development strategy were measured by performance metrics that include condensate recovery, sales gas production, minimum oil loss and fluid migration at gas-oil contact and overall water demand.\\n The results show that partial recycling along with barrier water injection may provide a mechanism for concurrent gas cap and oil column exploitation. A key factor that underlies the success of the co-development plan is the ability of the water injection at gas-oil contact to recover potential pressure drop in time as gas recycling ratio is reduced by forming effective barrier. This, in turn depends mainly on the reservoir geology and water injection volume and scheme. Moreover, reservoir characteristics that are favorable to the process are lower formation dip angle, smaller surface area at fluid contact and good injectivity of the reservoir rock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197200-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197200-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-Development Aspects of Super Giant Reservoirs With Condensate-Rich Gas Cap
Conventional strategy for developing of giant oil reservoirs with a gas cap involves an optimal production from the oil column before the gas cap is blown down. This paper investigates technical aspects of co-development strategies where demand for the gas may entail earlier exploitation of the gas cap along with the existing oil column development.
Co-development of giant reservoirs with condensate-rich gas cap are particularly challenging due to the presence of significant condensate volumes. The basic strategy of the co-development plan involves producing from a gas cap first under full gas recycling so as to accelerate condensate recovery. This is followed by sales gas production by means of partial gas recycling in conjunction with water injection at gas-oil contact for pressure maintenance purposes. The injection of water at gas-oil contact is intended to provide a water barrier or fence that separates and / or minimize gas cap expansion toward oil. The degree at which sales gas is produced is under pressure maintenance scheme is thus linked to the level of the partial gas recycling and the efficiency of the barrier or fence water injection.
To explore the feasibility of this process, reservoir simulations of mechanistic models were first used to study the reservoir physics of water injection at gas-oil contact for the purpose creating water barrier and /or fence. This was followed by implementation of the co-development scheme using sector models that represent two giant carbonate gas cap reservoirs. The feasibility and merits of the co-development strategy were measured by performance metrics that include condensate recovery, sales gas production, minimum oil loss and fluid migration at gas-oil contact and overall water demand.
The results show that partial recycling along with barrier water injection may provide a mechanism for concurrent gas cap and oil column exploitation. A key factor that underlies the success of the co-development plan is the ability of the water injection at gas-oil contact to recover potential pressure drop in time as gas recycling ratio is reduced by forming effective barrier. This, in turn depends mainly on the reservoir geology and water injection volume and scheme. Moreover, reservoir characteristics that are favorable to the process are lower formation dip angle, smaller surface area at fluid contact and good injectivity of the reservoir rock.