阳光下的太多:参孙叙事中的故意歧义

Q2 Arts and Humanities Hebrew Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-03 DOI:10.1353/hbr.2021.0017

Naphtali S. Meshel

{"title":"阳光下的太多:参孙叙事中的故意歧义","authors":"Naphtali S. Meshel","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2021.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper aims to expose a case of intentional ambiguity in the Samson narrative in Judges, and to demonstrate the literary and ideological value of the systematic ambiguity in the story of Samson's miraculous conception. In doing so, it adds one more item to a list of criteria that may be used to identify intentionality in ambiguous formulations – a criterion termed \"hypergrammaticality.\"","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"55 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too Much in the Sun: Intentional Ambiguity in the Samson Narrative\",\"authors\":\"Naphtali S. Meshel\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hbr.2021.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper aims to expose a case of intentional ambiguity in the Samson narrative in Judges, and to demonstrate the literary and ideological value of the systematic ambiguity in the story of Samson's miraculous conception. In doing so, it adds one more item to a list of criteria that may be used to identify intentionality in ambiguous formulations – a criterion termed \\\"hypergrammaticality.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":35110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文旨在揭示《士师记》中参孙故事中故意歧义的一个案例，并论证参孙奇迹般受孕故事中系统歧义的文学价值和思想价值。在这样做的过程中，它在可用于识别歧义表述中的意向性的标准列表中又增加了一项，这一标准被称为“高语法性”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Too Much in the Sun: Intentional Ambiguity in the Samson Narrative

Abstract:This paper aims to expose a case of intentional ambiguity in the Samson narrative in Judges, and to demonstrate the literary and ideological value of the systematic ambiguity in the story of Samson's miraculous conception. In doing so, it adds one more item to a list of criteria that may be used to identify intentionality in ambiguous formulations – a criterion termed "hypergrammaticality."

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊