联合国的责任保护:选择性历史和不完整叙述的问题

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Responsibility to Protect Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI:10.1163/1875-984x-20220008

Karen R. Smith

{"title":"联合国的责任保护:选择性历史和不完整叙述的问题","authors":"Karen R. Smith","doi":"10.1163/1875-984x-20220008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe current discussion on R2P at the UN is largely ahistorical or at most informed by selective historical references, which exclude earlier forms of intervention aimed at atrocity prevention, particularly by states in the global South. This contribution argues that the result is a skewed understanding of the practice of intervention that serves to deny agency to actors outside of the West and undermines the framing of atrocity prevention and R2P as an issue of global concern.","PeriodicalId":38207,"journal":{"name":"Global Responsibility to Protect","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"R2P at the UN: the Problem of Selective History and Incomplete Narratives\",\"authors\":\"Karen R. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1875-984x-20220008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe current discussion on R2P at the UN is largely ahistorical or at most informed by selective historical references, which exclude earlier forms of intervention aimed at atrocity prevention, particularly by states in the global South. This contribution argues that the result is a skewed understanding of the practice of intervention that serves to deny agency to actors outside of the West and undermines the framing of atrocity prevention and R2P as an issue of global concern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Responsibility to Protect\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Responsibility to Protect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984x-20220008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Responsibility to Protect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984x-20220008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目前联合国关于R2P的讨论在很大程度上是不符合历史的，或者至多是通过选择性的历史参考来提供信息，这些参考排除了旨在防止暴行的早期干预形式，尤其是来自全球南方国家的干预。这篇文章认为，其结果是对干预实践的一种扭曲的理解，这种理解拒绝了西方以外的行动者的代理，并破坏了将预防暴行和R2P作为全球关注的问题的框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

R2P at the UN: the Problem of Selective History and Incomplete Narratives

The current discussion on R2P at the UN is largely ahistorical or at most informed by selective historical references, which exclude earlier forms of intervention aimed at atrocity prevention, particularly by states in the global South. This contribution argues that the result is a skewed understanding of the practice of intervention that serves to deny agency to actors outside of the West and undermines the framing of atrocity prevention and R2P as an issue of global concern.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Responsibility to Protect Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

44.40%

发文量