edessa的Bardaisan和近东基督徒受迫害的记忆*

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2019-06-25 DOI:10.1111/2041-5370.12098
NATHANAEL ANDRADE
{"title":"edessa的Bardaisan和近东基督徒受迫害的记忆*","authors":"NATHANAEL ANDRADE","doi":"10.1111/2041-5370.12098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>According to Eusebius, the famous Edessene thinker Bardaisan wrote his work <i>On Fate</i> in a time of persecution and addressed it to a figure named Antoninus (<i>HE</i> 4.30). It is commonly surmised that this ‘Antoninus’ was a Roman emperor who sanctioned Christian persecution in some way. But scholars have varied in their interpretations. Some have identified this figure as Caracalla, who visited Edessa in 216–217. But since Eusebius situated Bardaisan’s activity in the reign of Marcus Aurelius, he is often deemed to be the Antoninus in question. As this article surmises, the testimony of Eusebius and other late antique authors, like Epiphanius, reflect certain memories both of the integration of Edessa into the Roman provincial system under Caracalla and the social tensions that it raised. But largely due to Eusebius’ narrative, late antique authors conceived of Marcus Aurelius as the ‘Antoninus’ to whom Bardaisan reportedly addressed <i>On Fate</i> and other apologetic work, and they created social memories of Bardaisan as a would-be confessor in a context of persecution.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43661,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES","volume":"62 1","pages":"86-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/2041-5370.12098","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BARDAISAN OF EDESSA AND MEMORIES OF CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION IN THE NEAR EAST∗\",\"authors\":\"NATHANAEL ANDRADE\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2041-5370.12098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>According to Eusebius, the famous Edessene thinker Bardaisan wrote his work <i>On Fate</i> in a time of persecution and addressed it to a figure named Antoninus (<i>HE</i> 4.30). It is commonly surmised that this ‘Antoninus’ was a Roman emperor who sanctioned Christian persecution in some way. But scholars have varied in their interpretations. Some have identified this figure as Caracalla, who visited Edessa in 216–217. But since Eusebius situated Bardaisan’s activity in the reign of Marcus Aurelius, he is often deemed to be the Antoninus in question. As this article surmises, the testimony of Eusebius and other late antique authors, like Epiphanius, reflect certain memories both of the integration of Edessa into the Roman provincial system under Caracalla and the social tensions that it raised. But largely due to Eusebius’ narrative, late antique authors conceived of Marcus Aurelius as the ‘Antoninus’ to whom Bardaisan reportedly addressed <i>On Fate</i> and other apologetic work, and they created social memories of Bardaisan as a would-be confessor in a context of persecution.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"86-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/2041-5370.12098\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-5370.12098\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-5370.12098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据优西比乌斯的说法,著名的埃德赛尼派思想家巴尔达桑(Bardaisan)在一个受迫害的时代写了《论命运》(On Fate)一书,并把它写给了一个名叫安东尼努斯(Antoninus)的人(HE 4.30)。人们普遍猜测,这个“安东尼努斯”是一位罗马皇帝,他以某种方式批准了基督教迫害。但学者们的解释各不相同。有些人认为这个人是卡拉卡拉,他在216-217年间访问了埃德萨。但由于优西比乌斯把巴尔达桑的活动放在马可·奥勒留统治时期,他经常被认为是有问题的安东尼努斯。正如这篇文章所推测的那样,优西比乌斯和其他晚期古代作家的证词,如埃皮法尼乌斯,反映了埃德萨在卡拉卡拉统治下融入罗马行省体系的某些记忆,以及由此引发的社会紧张局势。但很大程度上由于优西比乌斯的叙述,晚期的古代作家把马可·奥勒留想象成“安东尼”,据报道,巴尔达桑在《论命运》和其他道歉作品中向他讲话,他们创造了巴尔达桑在迫害背景下的潜在忏悔者的社会记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BARDAISAN OF EDESSA AND MEMORIES OF CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION IN THE NEAR EAST∗

According to Eusebius, the famous Edessene thinker Bardaisan wrote his work On Fate in a time of persecution and addressed it to a figure named Antoninus (HE 4.30). It is commonly surmised that this ‘Antoninus’ was a Roman emperor who sanctioned Christian persecution in some way. But scholars have varied in their interpretations. Some have identified this figure as Caracalla, who visited Edessa in 216–217. But since Eusebius situated Bardaisan’s activity in the reign of Marcus Aurelius, he is often deemed to be the Antoninus in question. As this article surmises, the testimony of Eusebius and other late antique authors, like Epiphanius, reflect certain memories both of the integration of Edessa into the Roman provincial system under Caracalla and the social tensions that it raised. But largely due to Eusebius’ narrative, late antique authors conceived of Marcus Aurelius as the ‘Antoninus’ to whom Bardaisan reportedly addressed On Fate and other apologetic work, and they created social memories of Bardaisan as a would-be confessor in a context of persecution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tale of two Octavias: historical empathy and intimate partner ‘violence’ The abuse of aged parents in the ancient Roman world ‘Start with the cage’: coercive control and the Roman husband The farmer wants a wife: ecofeminism, domestic violence, and coercive control in Roman agricultural writing The princeps investigates: two cases of domestic violence in Tacitus’ Annals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1