铝合金焊接过程中NO2暴露测量技术的评价

T. McManus, A. Haddad
{"title":"铝合金焊接过程中NO2暴露测量技术的评价","authors":"T. McManus, A. Haddad","doi":"10.5539/ENRR.V9N2P75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arc welding is a complex process that results in many air contaminants of health significance to humans. As a result, regulators worldwide require employers to determine exposure of welders and other workers to these contaminants. The very small Exposure Limit for NO2 limits the technology available for assessing exposure. Bias caused by ozone, a known interferent in the measurement of NO2, is a major concern. This investigation involved side-by-side comparison of results provided by handheld instruments containing electrochemical sensors for NO2 to those produced by an air pollution analyzer specific to NO2 using bag samples of plumes collected during production welding (Gas Shielded Metal Arc Welding [GMAW] commonly known as Metal Inert Gas [MIG welding]) on aluminum alloys. The shield gas was argon. Monitoring to confirm utility of the method was performed on welders. Results from all instruments were similar despite differences in measurement technology and instrument and sensor manufacturer. Levels experienced during confirmatory testing on welders to determine exposures of short duration and long intermittency as occur during real-world activity were comparable to the Threshold Limit Value for NO2 of 0.2ppm (parts per million) expressed as a Time-Weighted Average over 8 hours, and were less than the Ceiling Limit of 1ppm used by some jurisdictions. Hand-held instruments containing electrochemical sensors for NO2 and datalogging capability are suitable for use in this application. The ability to draw the sample to the instrument by a pump is an important consideration in providing welder safety and protecting the instrument.","PeriodicalId":11699,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Technologies for Measuring Exposure to NO2 during Welding on Aluminum Alloys\",\"authors\":\"T. McManus, A. Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ENRR.V9N2P75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arc welding is a complex process that results in many air contaminants of health significance to humans. As a result, regulators worldwide require employers to determine exposure of welders and other workers to these contaminants. The very small Exposure Limit for NO2 limits the technology available for assessing exposure. Bias caused by ozone, a known interferent in the measurement of NO2, is a major concern. This investigation involved side-by-side comparison of results provided by handheld instruments containing electrochemical sensors for NO2 to those produced by an air pollution analyzer specific to NO2 using bag samples of plumes collected during production welding (Gas Shielded Metal Arc Welding [GMAW] commonly known as Metal Inert Gas [MIG welding]) on aluminum alloys. The shield gas was argon. Monitoring to confirm utility of the method was performed on welders. Results from all instruments were similar despite differences in measurement technology and instrument and sensor manufacturer. Levels experienced during confirmatory testing on welders to determine exposures of short duration and long intermittency as occur during real-world activity were comparable to the Threshold Limit Value for NO2 of 0.2ppm (parts per million) expressed as a Time-Weighted Average over 8 hours, and were less than the Ceiling Limit of 1ppm used by some jurisdictions. Hand-held instruments containing electrochemical sensors for NO2 and datalogging capability are suitable for use in this application. The ability to draw the sample to the instrument by a pump is an important consideration in providing welder safety and protecting the instrument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Natural Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Natural Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ENRR.V9N2P75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ENRR.V9N2P75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

弧焊是一个复杂的过程,会产生许多对人体健康有重要影响的空气污染物。因此,世界各地的监管机构要求雇主确定焊工和其他工人接触这些污染物的情况。二氧化氮极低的暴露限值限制了评估暴露的可用技术。臭氧是测量二氧化氮时已知的干扰物,它造成的偏差是一个主要问题。这项调查包括将装有电化学二氧化氮传感器的手持仪器提供的结果与专门针对二氧化氮的空气污染分析仪产生的结果进行并列比较,这些结果使用的是铝合金生产焊接(气体保护金属电弧焊[GMAW],通常称为金属惰性气体[MIG焊接])期间收集的羽流袋样品。保护气体是氩气。对焊工进行了监测以确认该方法的有效性。尽管测量技术、仪器和传感器制造商存在差异,但所有仪器的结果相似。在对焊工进行验证性测试以确定在实际活动中发生的短时间和长间歇暴露的水平,与以8小时时间加权平均值表示的0.2ppm(百万分之一)的二氧化氮阈值相当,低于某些司法管辖区使用的1ppm的上限限制。包含电化学二氧化氮传感器和数据记录功能的手持仪器适合在此应用中使用。通过泵将样品抽到仪器上的能力是提供焊工安全和保护仪器的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Technologies for Measuring Exposure to NO2 during Welding on Aluminum Alloys
Arc welding is a complex process that results in many air contaminants of health significance to humans. As a result, regulators worldwide require employers to determine exposure of welders and other workers to these contaminants. The very small Exposure Limit for NO2 limits the technology available for assessing exposure. Bias caused by ozone, a known interferent in the measurement of NO2, is a major concern. This investigation involved side-by-side comparison of results provided by handheld instruments containing electrochemical sensors for NO2 to those produced by an air pollution analyzer specific to NO2 using bag samples of plumes collected during production welding (Gas Shielded Metal Arc Welding [GMAW] commonly known as Metal Inert Gas [MIG welding]) on aluminum alloys. The shield gas was argon. Monitoring to confirm utility of the method was performed on welders. Results from all instruments were similar despite differences in measurement technology and instrument and sensor manufacturer. Levels experienced during confirmatory testing on welders to determine exposures of short duration and long intermittency as occur during real-world activity were comparable to the Threshold Limit Value for NO2 of 0.2ppm (parts per million) expressed as a Time-Weighted Average over 8 hours, and were less than the Ceiling Limit of 1ppm used by some jurisdictions. Hand-held instruments containing electrochemical sensors for NO2 and datalogging capability are suitable for use in this application. The ability to draw the sample to the instrument by a pump is an important consideration in providing welder safety and protecting the instrument.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrogen Supply Chains Downstream – A Systematic Analysis of The Western U.S. Tackling Environmental Problems: Are People and the Environment Antithetical? Spatiotemporal Dynamic of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Their Drivers in the Fincha' a-Neshe Sub-Basin, Southeastern Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia Influence of Different Land Management Systems on the Dynamics of Carbon Biodegradability and Nitrogen Mineralization in a Sudanian Savanah Grasslands Soil, Western Burkina Faso Perception and Resilience Strategies of Livestock Farmers and Agro-Pastoralists Affected by Climate Change: Case of the urban commune of Tera, Niger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1