复杂评估的学习者资源

Piotr Mitros
{"title":"复杂评估的学习者资源","authors":"Piotr Mitros","doi":"10.1145/2724660.2728683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present results from a pilot study where students successfully created complex assessments for a MOOC in introductory electronics -- an area with a very large expert-novice gap. Previous work in learnersourcing found that learners can productively contribute through simple tasks. However, many course resources require a high level of expertise to create, and prior work fell short on tasks with a large expert-novice gap, such as textbook creation or concept tagging. Since these constitute a substantial portion of course creation costs, addressing this issue is prerequisite to substantially shifting MOOC economics through learnersourcing. This represents one of the first successes in learnersourcing with a large expert-novice gap. In the pilot, we reached out to 206 students (out of thousands who met eligibility criteria) who contributed 14 complex high-quality design problems. This results suggests a full cohort could contribute hundreds of problems. We achieved this through a four-pronged approach: (1) pre-selecting top learners (2) community feedback process (3) student mini-course in pedagogy (4) instructor review and involvement.","PeriodicalId":20664,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learnersourcing of Complex Assessments\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Mitros\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2724660.2728683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present results from a pilot study where students successfully created complex assessments for a MOOC in introductory electronics -- an area with a very large expert-novice gap. Previous work in learnersourcing found that learners can productively contribute through simple tasks. However, many course resources require a high level of expertise to create, and prior work fell short on tasks with a large expert-novice gap, such as textbook creation or concept tagging. Since these constitute a substantial portion of course creation costs, addressing this issue is prerequisite to substantially shifting MOOC economics through learnersourcing. This represents one of the first successes in learnersourcing with a large expert-novice gap. In the pilot, we reached out to 206 students (out of thousands who met eligibility criteria) who contributed 14 complex high-quality design problems. This results suggests a full cohort could contribute hundreds of problems. We achieved this through a four-pronged approach: (1) pre-selecting top learners (2) community feedback process (3) student mini-course in pedagogy (4) instructor review and involvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

我们展示了一项试点研究的结果,在这项研究中,学生们成功地为入门电子课程的MOOC创建了复杂的评估,这是一个专家与新手之间存在很大差距的领域。之前关于learnersourcing的研究发现,学习者可以通过简单的任务做出富有成效的贡献。然而,许多课程资源需要高水平的专业知识来创建,并且先前的工作在专家与新手之间存在巨大差距的任务上表现不佳,例如教科书创建或概念标记。由于这些费用构成了课程创建成本的很大一部分,因此解决这一问题是通过学习者资源大幅改变MOOC经济的先决条件。这是在专家和新手之间存在巨大差距的情况下,学习者外包的首批成功案例之一。在试点中,我们接触了206名学生(从数千名符合资格标准的学生中),他们贡献了14个复杂的高质量设计问题。这一结果表明,一个完整的群体可能会造成数百个问题。我们通过四个方面的方法实现了这一目标:(1)预选最佳学习者(2)社区反馈过程(3)学生教育学迷你课程(4)教师评审和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learnersourcing of Complex Assessments
We present results from a pilot study where students successfully created complex assessments for a MOOC in introductory electronics -- an area with a very large expert-novice gap. Previous work in learnersourcing found that learners can productively contribute through simple tasks. However, many course resources require a high level of expertise to create, and prior work fell short on tasks with a large expert-novice gap, such as textbook creation or concept tagging. Since these constitute a substantial portion of course creation costs, addressing this issue is prerequisite to substantially shifting MOOC economics through learnersourcing. This represents one of the first successes in learnersourcing with a large expert-novice gap. In the pilot, we reached out to 206 students (out of thousands who met eligibility criteria) who contributed 14 complex high-quality design problems. This results suggests a full cohort could contribute hundreds of problems. We achieved this through a four-pronged approach: (1) pre-selecting top learners (2) community feedback process (3) student mini-course in pedagogy (4) instructor review and involvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning is Not a Spectator Sport: Doing is Better than Watching for Learning from a MOOC Learnersourcing of Complex Assessments All It Takes Is One: Evidence for a Strategy for Seeding Large Scale Peer Learning Interactions Designing MOOCs as Interactive Places for Collaborative Learning Who You Are or What You Do: Comparing the Predictive Power of Demographics vs. Activity Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1