尼日利亚天然气货币化政策的宏观经济、部门和分配影响:CGE应用

Emmanuel O. Agiaye
{"title":"尼日利亚天然气货币化政策的宏观经济、部门和分配影响:CGE应用","authors":"Emmanuel O. Agiaye","doi":"10.2118/198809-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Nigerian gas market experienced growth in recent years due to the gas development policies of the government such as the Nigerian gas master plan. Nevertheless, the gas supply and utilization per capita has barely changed while policy objectives are largely unfulfilled. A new national gas policy 2017 recognized a full-blown energy crises in Nigeria in spite of its abundant gas resources. It thereby aims to increase gas utilization with more contribution to GDP, grow key sectors of the economy and reduce gas flaring to 2 percent. A policy of the magnitude of gas monetization policy a posteriori would have significant positive or negative impacts on macroeconomic, sectoral and distributional indicators. Is gas monetization policy good for all all? Employing the comparative static CGE model, this study carries out evaluation of increased gas supply on the Nigeria economy from 80 percent flare gas reduction and 30 percent reduction in direct tax rate on production. Results show that increased gas supply from flareout have positive influences on economic growth but slowed down with application of production tax incentives. The GDP, real investments, government revenues and sectors experienced growths except agriculture and transport sectors. The drop in average consumer prices encouraged household consumption as well as increased welfare. The study established causal relationship between increased gas utilization and economic growth. Efforts in driving the gas flaredown of monetization policy should be facilitated. The government shall exercise caution to ensure protection of the economy to guarantee proportionate health of the sectors that were negatively impacted such as agriculture and transport.","PeriodicalId":11250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroeconomic, Sectoral and Distributional Impact of Gas Monetization Policy in Nigeria: A CGE Application\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel O. Agiaye\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198809-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Nigerian gas market experienced growth in recent years due to the gas development policies of the government such as the Nigerian gas master plan. Nevertheless, the gas supply and utilization per capita has barely changed while policy objectives are largely unfulfilled. A new national gas policy 2017 recognized a full-blown energy crises in Nigeria in spite of its abundant gas resources. It thereby aims to increase gas utilization with more contribution to GDP, grow key sectors of the economy and reduce gas flaring to 2 percent. A policy of the magnitude of gas monetization policy a posteriori would have significant positive or negative impacts on macroeconomic, sectoral and distributional indicators. Is gas monetization policy good for all all? Employing the comparative static CGE model, this study carries out evaluation of increased gas supply on the Nigeria economy from 80 percent flare gas reduction and 30 percent reduction in direct tax rate on production. Results show that increased gas supply from flareout have positive influences on economic growth but slowed down with application of production tax incentives. The GDP, real investments, government revenues and sectors experienced growths except agriculture and transport sectors. The drop in average consumer prices encouraged household consumption as well as increased welfare. The study established causal relationship between increased gas utilization and economic growth. Efforts in driving the gas flaredown of monetization policy should be facilitated. The government shall exercise caution to ensure protection of the economy to guarantee proportionate health of the sectors that were negatively impacted such as agriculture and transport.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198809-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198809-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于尼日利亚天然气总体规划等政府的天然气开发政策,尼日利亚天然气市场近年来经历了增长。然而,人均天然气供应和利用几乎没有变化,政策目标基本上没有实现。2017年新的国家天然气政策承认,尽管尼日利亚拥有丰富的天然气资源,但该国仍面临全面的能源危机。因此,它的目标是提高天然气利用率,对GDP做出更大贡献,发展关键经济部门,并将天然气燃除率降至2%。事后的天然气货币化政策将对宏观经济、部门和分配指标产生重大的积极或消极影响。天然气货币化政策对所有人都有利吗?本研究采用比较静态CGE模型,通过减少80%的火炬气和减少30%的生产直接税率,对尼日利亚经济增加的天然气供应进行了评估。研究结果表明,因燃除而增加的天然气供应对经济增长有积极影响,但由于生产税收优惠的实施而放缓。国内生产总值、实际投资、政府收入和除农业和运输部门外的其他部门均出现增长。平均消费价格的下降鼓励了家庭消费,也增加了福利。该研究建立了天然气利用增加与经济增长之间的因果关系。应促进推动货币化政策的努力。政府应谨慎行事,确保对经济的保护,以保证农业和运输等受到负面影响的部门的相应健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macroeconomic, Sectoral and Distributional Impact of Gas Monetization Policy in Nigeria: A CGE Application
The Nigerian gas market experienced growth in recent years due to the gas development policies of the government such as the Nigerian gas master plan. Nevertheless, the gas supply and utilization per capita has barely changed while policy objectives are largely unfulfilled. A new national gas policy 2017 recognized a full-blown energy crises in Nigeria in spite of its abundant gas resources. It thereby aims to increase gas utilization with more contribution to GDP, grow key sectors of the economy and reduce gas flaring to 2 percent. A policy of the magnitude of gas monetization policy a posteriori would have significant positive or negative impacts on macroeconomic, sectoral and distributional indicators. Is gas monetization policy good for all all? Employing the comparative static CGE model, this study carries out evaluation of increased gas supply on the Nigeria economy from 80 percent flare gas reduction and 30 percent reduction in direct tax rate on production. Results show that increased gas supply from flareout have positive influences on economic growth but slowed down with application of production tax incentives. The GDP, real investments, government revenues and sectors experienced growths except agriculture and transport sectors. The drop in average consumer prices encouraged household consumption as well as increased welfare. The study established causal relationship between increased gas utilization and economic growth. Efforts in driving the gas flaredown of monetization policy should be facilitated. The government shall exercise caution to ensure protection of the economy to guarantee proportionate health of the sectors that were negatively impacted such as agriculture and transport.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Macroeconomic, Sectoral and Distributional Impact of Gas Monetization Policy in Nigeria: A CGE Application Occupational deaths from Similar Causes; Why? Production Restoration Through Innovative Sourcing of Lift Gas - Jacket X Case Study Experimental Investigation of the Macroscopic Displacement Efficiency of Locally Sourced Locust Bean Gum and Gum Arabic The Effect of Monovalent and Divalent Ions on Biodegradable Polymers in Enhanced Oil Recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1