过程追踪:归纳、演绎、推理、因果

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Revista De Ciencia Politica Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.4067/S0718-090X2017000300659
Tomás Bril-Mascarenhas, Antoine Maillet, P. Mayaux
{"title":"过程追踪:归纳、演绎、推理、因果","authors":"Tomás Bril-Mascarenhas, Antoine Maillet, P. Mayaux","doi":"10.4067/S0718-090X2017000300659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process tracing is a method to obtain solid causal inferences. Concerned by the fragmentation of the growing literature distinguishing different types of process tracing, we highlight the elements that unite this method: the construction, through different routes, of narratives that provide plausible, persuasive explanations of the outcomes of interest. Our argument draws on the comparison of two studies with different entry points to the research process: the first one starts inductively due to the novelty of the outcome of interest, while the second study starts deductively since previous theories were available. We show how to conduct process-tracing analysis rigorously and highlight that these studies converge to produce narratives structured around hypotheses and causal mechanisms that explain the outcomes.","PeriodicalId":45507,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Ciencia Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Tracing: Induccion, Deduccion e Inferencia causal\",\"authors\":\"Tomás Bril-Mascarenhas, Antoine Maillet, P. Mayaux\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-090X2017000300659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Process tracing is a method to obtain solid causal inferences. Concerned by the fragmentation of the growing literature distinguishing different types of process tracing, we highlight the elements that unite this method: the construction, through different routes, of narratives that provide plausible, persuasive explanations of the outcomes of interest. Our argument draws on the comparison of two studies with different entry points to the research process: the first one starts inductively due to the novelty of the outcome of interest, while the second study starts deductively since previous theories were available. We show how to conduct process-tracing analysis rigorously and highlight that these studies converge to produce narratives structured around hypotheses and causal mechanisms that explain the outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Ciencia Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Ciencia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2017000300659\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Ciencia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2017000300659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

过程追踪是一种获得可靠因果推论的方法。考虑到区分不同类型的过程追踪的日益增长的文献的碎片化,我们强调了统一这种方法的元素:通过不同的路线,为感兴趣的结果提供合理的、有说服力的解释的叙述的构建。我们的论点是基于对两项研究的比较,它们具有不同的研究过程的切入点:第一个研究是由于兴趣结果的新颖性而开始的归纳性研究,而第二个研究是由于以前的理论可用而开始的演绎性研究。我们展示了如何严格地进行过程跟踪分析,并强调这些研究汇集在一起,产生围绕解释结果的假设和因果机制的叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Process Tracing: Induccion, Deduccion e Inferencia causal
Process tracing is a method to obtain solid causal inferences. Concerned by the fragmentation of the growing literature distinguishing different types of process tracing, we highlight the elements that unite this method: the construction, through different routes, of narratives that provide plausible, persuasive explanations of the outcomes of interest. Our argument draws on the comparison of two studies with different entry points to the research process: the first one starts inductively due to the novelty of the outcome of interest, while the second study starts deductively since previous theories were available. We show how to conduct process-tracing analysis rigorously and highlight that these studies converge to produce narratives structured around hypotheses and causal mechanisms that explain the outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista De Ciencia Politica
Revista De Ciencia Politica POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
35.70%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Revista de Ciencia Política is an international and refereed journal published by the Instituto de Ciencia Política of the Pontificia Uniersidad Católica de Chile. It appears twice a year in July and December and publishes articles in all areas of Political Science. It was founded in 1979. The editorial policies of the Revista de Ciencia Política encompass all areas of specialization and methodological approaches within Political Science. The journal promotes the academic discussion of present and past political phenomena, as well as conceptual analyses, from the perspective of the various sub-disciplines of Political Science: Political Theory, Comparative Politics, Interrnationnal Relations, Formal Analysis, Regional Studies, etc.
期刊最新文献
El análisis subnacional: aportes teóricos y metodológicos a la política comparada ¿Qué es lo subnacional de la desigualdad subnacional? Una mirada interseccional a la desigualdad en latinoamérica Estados, alianzas y desigualdad subnacional: dos provincias argentinas en perspectiva comparada, 2003-2015 Erradicación en suspenso: La dimensión simbólica de la pacificación negociada en el VRAEM Régimen electoral de género y representación política de las mujeres a nivel subnacional en México
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1