《关于应对中国外商直接投资的第452/2019号条例

Wouter van Zon
{"title":"《关于应对中国外商直接投资的第452/2019号条例","authors":"Wouter van Zon","doi":"10.54648/leie2023007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Regulation establishing a framework for screening of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) into the European Union (EU) represents a new chapter for the EU’s foreign policy. FDI is a divisive topic within the EU, particularly FDI originating from China. This article seeks to add to the existing literature by assessing the effectiveness of the Screening Regulation towards this Chinese FDI. This assessment shall elucidate the interplay of this Regulation with the internal market, the free movement of capital, freedom of establishment, and the duty of sincere cooperation in response to Chinese FDI. Whilst the Regulation has proven its effectiveness, several deficiencies still exist, brought to light by recent developments such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). By framing this article against the backdrop of the golden shares case law, these deficiencies are highlighted and addressed. Allowing EU Member States (MS) to safeguard their public order and security considerations in screening through national measures would allow for a better control over their markets in conjunction with the Regulation, although further development is needed.\nForeign direct investment, Chinese State-Owned Enterprises, Chinese economic statecraft, European External Trade Policy, EU trade policy, EU foreign policy, Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT), Freedom of establishment, Free movement of capital, Golden shares","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment\",\"authors\":\"Wouter van Zon\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2023007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Regulation establishing a framework for screening of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) into the European Union (EU) represents a new chapter for the EU’s foreign policy. FDI is a divisive topic within the EU, particularly FDI originating from China. This article seeks to add to the existing literature by assessing the effectiveness of the Screening Regulation towards this Chinese FDI. This assessment shall elucidate the interplay of this Regulation with the internal market, the free movement of capital, freedom of establishment, and the duty of sincere cooperation in response to Chinese FDI. Whilst the Regulation has proven its effectiveness, several deficiencies still exist, brought to light by recent developments such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). By framing this article against the backdrop of the golden shares case law, these deficiencies are highlighted and addressed. Allowing EU Member States (MS) to safeguard their public order and security considerations in screening through national measures would allow for a better control over their markets in conjunction with the Regulation, although further development is needed.\\nForeign direct investment, Chinese State-Owned Enterprises, Chinese economic statecraft, European External Trade Policy, EU trade policy, EU foreign policy, Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT), Freedom of establishment, Free movement of capital, Golden shares\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2023007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2023007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条例建立了对进入欧盟的外国直接投资(FDI)进行筛选的框架,代表了欧盟外交政策的新篇章。外国直接投资在欧盟内部是一个存在分歧的话题,尤其是来自中国的外国直接投资。本文试图通过评估审查规定对中国外国直接投资的有效性来补充现有文献。该评估应阐明本条例与内部市场、资本自由流动、设立自由以及应对中国FDI的真诚合作义务的相互作用。虽然《条例》已经证明了其有效性,但最近的事态发展,如COVID-19大流行和“一带一路”倡议,暴露了一些不足之处。通过将本文置于黄金股判例法的背景下,突出并解决了这些缺陷。允许欧盟成员国通过国家措施来维护其公共秩序和安全考虑因素,将有助于与该规例一起更好地控制其市场,尽管需要进一步发展。外国直接投资,中国国有企业,中国经济治国之道,欧洲对外贸易政策,欧盟贸易政策,欧盟外交政策,双边投资协定(BIT),设立自由,资本自由流动,黄金股
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment
The Regulation establishing a framework for screening of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) into the European Union (EU) represents a new chapter for the EU’s foreign policy. FDI is a divisive topic within the EU, particularly FDI originating from China. This article seeks to add to the existing literature by assessing the effectiveness of the Screening Regulation towards this Chinese FDI. This assessment shall elucidate the interplay of this Regulation with the internal market, the free movement of capital, freedom of establishment, and the duty of sincere cooperation in response to Chinese FDI. Whilst the Regulation has proven its effectiveness, several deficiencies still exist, brought to light by recent developments such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). By framing this article against the backdrop of the golden shares case law, these deficiencies are highlighted and addressed. Allowing EU Member States (MS) to safeguard their public order and security considerations in screening through national measures would allow for a better control over their markets in conjunction with the Regulation, although further development is needed. Foreign direct investment, Chinese State-Owned Enterprises, Chinese economic statecraft, European External Trade Policy, EU trade policy, EU foreign policy, Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT), Freedom of establishment, Free movement of capital, Golden shares
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1