海因里希·哈恩(1605-1668)。赫尔姆斯泰特大学路德教法学家的肖像

P. Astorri, Søren Frank Jensen
{"title":"海因里希·哈恩(1605-1668)。赫尔姆斯泰特大学路德教法学家的肖像","authors":"P. Astorri, Søren Frank Jensen","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article provides a first sketch of the scholarly and confessional identity of the Helmstedt law professor, Heinrich Hahn (1605–1668). It analyses Hahn’s most important work, a commentary on the Paratitla by Matthaeus Wesenbeck (1531–1586), and a funeral sermon delivered by Balthasar Cellarius (1614–1689) at Hahn’s funeral. By exploring what Hahn’s work reveals about his religious convictions alongside Cellarius’ portrait of him, the article presents a paradigmatic model of the interaction between law and religion in the early modern period. In his commentary, Hahn employs Scholastic moral theology, both at the level of general principles and in the resolution of legal problems. However, when it comes to decisive doctrinal points, Hahn turns away from Catholic sources. In the sermon, Cellarius presents Hahn as an ideal law professor whose faith was the foundation of his professional ethos as well as his private life. Throughout the sermon, he questions whether jurists can be good Christians and negotiates the relationship between faith and works.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heinrich Hahn (1605–1668). A Portrait of a Lutheran Jurist at the University of Helmstedt\",\"authors\":\"P. Astorri, Søren Frank Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zrgk-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article provides a first sketch of the scholarly and confessional identity of the Helmstedt law professor, Heinrich Hahn (1605–1668). It analyses Hahn’s most important work, a commentary on the Paratitla by Matthaeus Wesenbeck (1531–1586), and a funeral sermon delivered by Balthasar Cellarius (1614–1689) at Hahn’s funeral. By exploring what Hahn’s work reveals about his religious convictions alongside Cellarius’ portrait of him, the article presents a paradigmatic model of the interaction between law and religion in the early modern period. In his commentary, Hahn employs Scholastic moral theology, both at the level of general principles and in the resolution of legal problems. However, when it comes to decisive doctrinal points, Hahn turns away from Catholic sources. In the sermon, Cellarius presents Hahn as an ideal law professor whose faith was the foundation of his professional ethos as well as his private life. Throughout the sermon, he questions whether jurists can be good Christians and negotiates the relationship between faith and works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":24010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提供了Helmstedt法学教授海因里希·哈恩(Heinrich Hahn, 1605-1668)的学术和忏悔身份的初步草图。它分析了哈恩最重要的作品,马修斯·威森贝克(1531-1586)对《Paratitla》的评论,以及巴尔塔萨·塞拉留斯(1614-1689)在哈恩的葬礼上发表的葬礼布道。通过探索哈恩的作品所揭示的他的宗教信仰,以及塞拉利乌斯对他的描绘,本文呈现了一个现代早期法律与宗教相互作用的典范模型。在他的评论中,哈恩采用了经院道德神学,无论是在一般原则的层面上,还是在解决法律问题的层面上。然而,当涉及到决定性的教义点时,哈恩远离了天主教的来源。在布道中,塞拉留斯把哈恩描绘成一个理想的法学教授,他的信仰是他职业精神和私人生活的基础。在整个布道中,他质疑法学家是否可以成为好基督徒,并就信仰和行为之间的关系进行协商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heinrich Hahn (1605–1668). A Portrait of a Lutheran Jurist at the University of Helmstedt
Abstract This article provides a first sketch of the scholarly and confessional identity of the Helmstedt law professor, Heinrich Hahn (1605–1668). It analyses Hahn’s most important work, a commentary on the Paratitla by Matthaeus Wesenbeck (1531–1586), and a funeral sermon delivered by Balthasar Cellarius (1614–1689) at Hahn’s funeral. By exploring what Hahn’s work reveals about his religious convictions alongside Cellarius’ portrait of him, the article presents a paradigmatic model of the interaction between law and religion in the early modern period. In his commentary, Hahn employs Scholastic moral theology, both at the level of general principles and in the resolution of legal problems. However, when it comes to decisive doctrinal points, Hahn turns away from Catholic sources. In the sermon, Cellarius presents Hahn as an ideal law professor whose faith was the foundation of his professional ethos as well as his private life. Throughout the sermon, he questions whether jurists can be good Christians and negotiates the relationship between faith and works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leitung, Recht und Arbeit in der Kirche. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Gegenwart des evangelischen Kirchenrechts und des Religionsverfassungsrechts, Detlev W. Belling zu Ehren, hg. v. Christian Nottmeier/Martin Richter/Thorsten Ingo Schmidt (= Schriften zum Staatskirchenrecht 62) Martin Krutzler, Der Gewissenstäter im kanonischen Recht. Das kirchliche Sanktionsrecht im Lichte der Glaubens- und Gewissensfreiheit (= Kanonistische Studien und Texte 70) Acta Cusana, Quellen zur Lebensgeschichte des Nikolaus von Kues, Bd. III Lieferung 1: 1458 Oktober 1 bis 1459 Dezember 31, hg. von Johannes Helmrath/ Thomas Woelki David Scherf, Gesetz und Evangelium im Nachkriegsprotestantismus. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Ernst Wolf, Helmut Thielicke und Carl Heinz Ratschow (= Religion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 5) Central Courts in Early Modern Europe and the Americas, hg. v. A.M. Godfrey/C.H. van Rhee (= Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History 34)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1