在强制性和可选旅行中接受自动驾驶汽车背后的决定因素

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1680/jensu.23.00023
Iman Farzin, A. Mamdoohi, Mohammadhossein Abbasi, Amirhossein Baghestani, Francesco Ciari
{"title":"在强制性和可选旅行中接受自动驾驶汽车背后的决定因素","authors":"Iman Farzin, A. Mamdoohi, Mohammadhossein Abbasi, Amirhossein Baghestani, Francesco Ciari","doi":"10.1680/jensu.23.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the potential of Automated Vehicles (AVs) to radically change the transportation system, it is essential to investigate the factors affecting users’ intention to use. Although previous studies have mostly focused on internal schema of beliefs in latent variables, this paper aims to examine the impact of internal and external factors by integrating variables of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) along with environmental concern and perceived risk. Moreover, the effect of latent variables is also compared for different trip purposes (mandatory and optional) that received less attention in previous studies. Using stated preference survey, 641 valid responses from Tehran citizens have been collected. Estimation results of Structural Equation Modelling show a significant difference between the determinants of AVs acceptance across mandatory and optional trips. Estimated coefficients indicate that social influence and performance expectancy are the strongest explanatory factors in intention to use AVs on optional and mandatory trips, respectively. However, no significant difference is observed for the impact of environmental concern on intention to use AVs across both trip types.","PeriodicalId":49671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles in mandatory and optional trips\",\"authors\":\"Iman Farzin, A. Mamdoohi, Mohammadhossein Abbasi, Amirhossein Baghestani, Francesco Ciari\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jensu.23.00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the potential of Automated Vehicles (AVs) to radically change the transportation system, it is essential to investigate the factors affecting users’ intention to use. Although previous studies have mostly focused on internal schema of beliefs in latent variables, this paper aims to examine the impact of internal and external factors by integrating variables of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) along with environmental concern and perceived risk. Moreover, the effect of latent variables is also compared for different trip purposes (mandatory and optional) that received less attention in previous studies. Using stated preference survey, 641 valid responses from Tehran citizens have been collected. Estimation results of Structural Equation Modelling show a significant difference between the determinants of AVs acceptance across mandatory and optional trips. Estimated coefficients indicate that social influence and performance expectancy are the strongest explanatory factors in intention to use AVs on optional and mandatory trips, respectively. However, no significant difference is observed for the impact of environmental concern on intention to use AVs across both trip types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.23.00023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.23.00023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于自动驾驶汽车(AVs)有可能从根本上改变交通系统,因此有必要调查影响用户使用意愿的因素。虽然以往的研究大多集中在潜在变量的内部信念图式上,但本文旨在通过整合技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)的变量以及环境关注和感知风险来研究内外部因素的影响。此外,还比较了潜在变量对不同旅行目的(强制性和可选性)的影响,这在以往的研究中较少受到关注。使用声明偏好调查,收集了德黑兰公民的641份有效答复。结构方程模型的估计结果显示,自动驾驶汽车接受的决定因素在强制性和可选行程之间存在显著差异。估计系数表明,社会影响和绩效预期分别是自选出行和强制出行中使用自动驾驶汽车意愿的最强解释因素。然而,在两种出行类型中,环境问题对使用自动驾驶汽车意愿的影响没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles in mandatory and optional trips
Due to the potential of Automated Vehicles (AVs) to radically change the transportation system, it is essential to investigate the factors affecting users’ intention to use. Although previous studies have mostly focused on internal schema of beliefs in latent variables, this paper aims to examine the impact of internal and external factors by integrating variables of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) along with environmental concern and perceived risk. Moreover, the effect of latent variables is also compared for different trip purposes (mandatory and optional) that received less attention in previous studies. Using stated preference survey, 641 valid responses from Tehran citizens have been collected. Estimation results of Structural Equation Modelling show a significant difference between the determinants of AVs acceptance across mandatory and optional trips. Estimated coefficients indicate that social influence and performance expectancy are the strongest explanatory factors in intention to use AVs on optional and mandatory trips, respectively. However, no significant difference is observed for the impact of environmental concern on intention to use AVs across both trip types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Engineering Sustainability provides a forum for sharing the latest thinking from research and practice, and increasingly is presenting the ''how to'' of engineering a resilient future. The journal features refereed papers and shorter articles relating to the pursuit and implementation of sustainability principles through engineering planning, design and application. The tensions between and integration of social, economic and environmental considerations within such schemes are of particular relevance. Methodologies for assessing sustainability, policy issues, education and corporate responsibility will also be included. The aims will be met primarily by providing papers and briefing notes (including case histories and best practice guidance) of use to decision-makers, practitioners, researchers and students.
期刊最新文献
Thermal conductivity of an external wall with simulated smart Aerogel insulation system Life cycle based considerations in design of driven piles in sand Establishing preference ranking for town water supply in remote areas: case study in Taiwan Performance evaluation of prefabricated retaining wall systems based on centrifuge tests Urban microclimate analysis: residential block morphology impact on outdoor thermal comfort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1