“共同进化”的进化(第二部分):生物类比、不同种类的共同进化以及概念扩展的建议

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.004
Nathan Crilly
{"title":"“共同进化”的进化(第二部分):生物类比、不同种类的共同进化以及概念扩展的建议","authors":"Nathan Crilly","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Descriptions of problem-solution “co-evolution” either explicitly or implicitly draw an analogy between processes of design and processes of biological evolution. Analogies of this kind are common in research because of their potential to assist in explanation and discovery. However, reviewing the design literature reveals that the discussion of design co-evolution has become disconnected from the biological analogy on which it is founded, and from which other disciplines draw. Here, I explore the function of the co-evolution analogy, provide an illustrative example from biology, and explore the varieties of co-evolution to which design might be compared. By doing so, I propose two possible directions for expanding the design co-evolution concept: (i) examining what co-evolves in addition to, or instead of, problems and solutions, and (ii) examining the different levels at which co-evolution occurs. Both of these proposals are illustrated with a variant of the design co-evolution diagram.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 333-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621000927/pdfft?md5=acdd28a0ae85456d58181e0303901dd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872621000927-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of “Co-evolution” (Part II): The Biological Analogy, Different Kinds of Co-evolution, and Proposals for Conceptual Expansion\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Crilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Descriptions of problem-solution “co-evolution” either explicitly or implicitly draw an analogy between processes of design and processes of biological evolution. Analogies of this kind are common in research because of their potential to assist in explanation and discovery. However, reviewing the design literature reveals that the discussion of design co-evolution has become disconnected from the biological analogy on which it is founded, and from which other disciplines draw. Here, I explore the function of the co-evolution analogy, provide an illustrative example from biology, and explore the varieties of co-evolution to which design might be compared. By doing so, I propose two possible directions for expanding the design co-evolution concept: (i) examining what co-evolves in addition to, or instead of, problems and solutions, and (ii) examining the different levels at which co-evolution occurs. Both of these proposals are illustrated with a variant of the design co-evolution diagram.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 333-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621000927/pdfft?md5=acdd28a0ae85456d58181e0303901dd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872621000927-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621000927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621000927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

对解决问题的“共同进化”的描述或明或暗地将设计过程与生物进化过程进行了类比。这种类比在研究中很常见,因为它们有可能有助于解释和发现。然而,回顾设计文献发现,设计协同进化的讨论已经脱离了它所建立的生物类比,以及其他学科所借鉴的生物类比。在这里,我探讨了共同进化类比的功能,提供了一个来自生物学的说明性例子,并探讨了设计可以比较的共同进化的种类。通过这样做,我提出了扩展设计共同进化概念的两个可能的方向:(I)检查哪些共同进化除了问题和解决方案之外,或者不是问题和解决方案,以及(ii)检查共同进化发生的不同层次。这两种建议都用设计共同进化图的一个变体来说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Evolution of “Co-evolution” (Part II): The Biological Analogy, Different Kinds of Co-evolution, and Proposals for Conceptual Expansion

Descriptions of problem-solution “co-evolution” either explicitly or implicitly draw an analogy between processes of design and processes of biological evolution. Analogies of this kind are common in research because of their potential to assist in explanation and discovery. However, reviewing the design literature reveals that the discussion of design co-evolution has become disconnected from the biological analogy on which it is founded, and from which other disciplines draw. Here, I explore the function of the co-evolution analogy, provide an illustrative example from biology, and explore the varieties of co-evolution to which design might be compared. By doing so, I propose two possible directions for expanding the design co-evolution concept: (i) examining what co-evolves in addition to, or instead of, problems and solutions, and (ii) examining the different levels at which co-evolution occurs. Both of these proposals are illustrated with a variant of the design co-evolution diagram.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Reconceptualizing the Notion of Values in Design Talk Value Dimensions in Creative Collaborations for Social Innovation The Tools of the Trade: Cultures, Devices, and Valuation Practices in Urban Design Creating and Testing a Guideline for Governing Blockchain Ecosystems: A Study Informed by Design Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1