残疾和非残疾学生的CTE教师和非测试结果

Roddy Theobald, Dan Goldhaber, Erica Mallett Moore
{"title":"残疾和非残疾学生的CTE教师和非测试结果","authors":"Roddy Theobald, Dan Goldhaber, Erica Mallett Moore","doi":"10.1177/08884064231180595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors use data on high school students and teachers from Washington state to connect the observable characteristics and preparation of career and technical education (CTE) teachers to various non-test outcomes (absences, disciplinary incidents, grades, grade progression, and on-time graduation) of students with and without disabilities in their classrooms. The authors find that students participating in CTE tend to have better non-test outcomes when they are assigned to a CTE teacher from the state’s Business and Industry (B&I) pathway—designed for CTE teachers with 3 years of industry experience but no formal teacher preparation—relative to being assigned to a traditionally prepared CTE teacher. These relationships do not significantly differ for students with and without disabilities, despite survey data suggesting that CTE teachers from the B&I pathway receive little formal training in special education. These results suggest that content knowledge and experience may matter more than traditional preparation for CTE teacher effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":57031,"journal":{"name":"师范教育","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CTE Teachers and Non-Test Outcomes for Students With and Without Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Roddy Theobald, Dan Goldhaber, Erica Mallett Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08884064231180595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors use data on high school students and teachers from Washington state to connect the observable characteristics and preparation of career and technical education (CTE) teachers to various non-test outcomes (absences, disciplinary incidents, grades, grade progression, and on-time graduation) of students with and without disabilities in their classrooms. The authors find that students participating in CTE tend to have better non-test outcomes when they are assigned to a CTE teacher from the state’s Business and Industry (B&I) pathway—designed for CTE teachers with 3 years of industry experience but no formal teacher preparation—relative to being assigned to a traditionally prepared CTE teacher. These relationships do not significantly differ for students with and without disabilities, despite survey data suggesting that CTE teachers from the B&I pathway receive little formal training in special education. These results suggest that content knowledge and experience may matter more than traditional preparation for CTE teacher effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":57031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"师范教育\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"师范教育\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1094\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064231180595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"师范教育","FirstCategoryId":"1094","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064231180595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者使用华盛顿州高中学生和教师的数据,将职业和技术教育(CTE)教师的可观察特征和准备与课堂上残疾和非残疾学生的各种非测试结果(缺勤、纪律事件、成绩、成绩进步和按时毕业)联系起来。作者发现,与传统的CTE老师相比,参加CTE的学生在被分配给来自国家商业和工业(B&I)途径的CTE老师时往往有更好的非测试结果。B&I途径是为具有3年行业经验但没有正式教师准备的CTE老师设计的。尽管调查数据表明,来自B&I途径的CTE教师在特殊教育方面接受的正规培训很少,但对于有残疾和没有残疾的学生来说,这些关系并没有显著差异。这些结果表明,内容知识和经验可能比传统的准备对CTE教师的有效性更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CTE Teachers and Non-Test Outcomes for Students With and Without Disabilities
The authors use data on high school students and teachers from Washington state to connect the observable characteristics and preparation of career and technical education (CTE) teachers to various non-test outcomes (absences, disciplinary incidents, grades, grade progression, and on-time graduation) of students with and without disabilities in their classrooms. The authors find that students participating in CTE tend to have better non-test outcomes when they are assigned to a CTE teacher from the state’s Business and Industry (B&I) pathway—designed for CTE teachers with 3 years of industry experience but no formal teacher preparation—relative to being assigned to a traditionally prepared CTE teacher. These relationships do not significantly differ for students with and without disabilities, despite survey data suggesting that CTE teachers from the B&I pathway receive little formal training in special education. These results suggest that content knowledge and experience may matter more than traditional preparation for CTE teacher effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4329
期刊最新文献
Examining Standards Related to Family–Professional Partnerships for Education Professionals CTE Teachers and Non-Test Outcomes for Students With and Without Disabilities Field Experiences in Special Education Teacher Preparation: A Review of the Literature The Nationwide Trends and Preparation Requirements of Alternative Route Programs in Special Education Teacher Education in a Reality of a World Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1