降低马力:赛马会与英国赛马规则

W. Vamplew
{"title":"降低马力:赛马会与英国赛马规则","authors":"W. Vamplew","doi":"10.1080/1473098042000275792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Jockey Club, founded in 1752, has influenced racing for two centuries and controlled it by the consent of the racing industry since the 1870s. Despite legal challenges and public criticism of a self-perpetuating, private club governing a major British sport, it maintained its pre-eminent position until the 1990s. In 1993 it began to share power with the British Horseracing Board, though retaining the regulatory and disciplinary role. Failure to take full cognisance of human rights legislation, media publicity over corruption in the sport, and a conflict of interest via its ownership of racecourses led to proposals for a new, independent governing body.","PeriodicalId":36418,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"94-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced Horse Power: The Jockey Club and the Regulation of British Horseracing\",\"authors\":\"W. Vamplew\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1473098042000275792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Jockey Club, founded in 1752, has influenced racing for two centuries and controlled it by the consent of the racing industry since the 1870s. Despite legal challenges and public criticism of a self-perpetuating, private club governing a major British sport, it maintained its pre-eminent position until the 1990s. In 1993 it began to share power with the British Horseracing Board, though retaining the regulatory and disciplinary role. Failure to take full cognisance of human rights legislation, media publicity over corruption in the sport, and a conflict of interest via its ownership of racecourses led to proposals for a new, independent governing body.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactive Entertainment Law Review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"94-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactive Entertainment Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1473098042000275792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1473098042000275792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

成立于1752年的赛马会(Jockey Club)影响了赛马运动两个世纪,自19世纪70年代以来,在赛马行业的同意下控制了赛马运动。尽管存在法律上的挑战和公众对一个自我延续的私人俱乐部管理一项英国主要运动的批评,但它一直保持着卓越的地位,直到20世纪90年代。1993年,它开始与英国赛马委员会分享权力,尽管保留了监管和纪律的角色。由于没有充分认识到人权立法,媒体对体育运动腐败的宣传,以及通过其对赛马场的所有权而产生的利益冲突,导致了建立一个新的独立管理机构的提议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduced Horse Power: The Jockey Club and the Regulation of British Horseracing
The Jockey Club, founded in 1752, has influenced racing for two centuries and controlled it by the consent of the racing industry since the 1870s. Despite legal challenges and public criticism of a self-perpetuating, private club governing a major British sport, it maintained its pre-eminent position until the 1990s. In 1993 it began to share power with the British Horseracing Board, though retaining the regulatory and disciplinary role. Failure to take full cognisance of human rights legislation, media publicity over corruption in the sport, and a conflict of interest via its ownership of racecourses led to proposals for a new, independent governing body.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and evolving issues under US copyright and patent law EULAs: Flexible tools of governance or instruments of authoritarianism? Are streaming rights the new broadcasting rights of the 21st century? A comparative review on the specific case of esport competitions Mr. Feige, I don’t feel so good … Copyright ownership, creators’ rights, and the Marvel Cinematic Universe Dark clouds gather – The development of cloud gaming, and competition agencies’ efforts to enable it on mobile app stores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1