公共空间:秘鲁利马圣地亚哥德苏尔科区研究

Ana Sabogal Dunin Borkowski, M. A. Romero, Tarik Tavera Medina, Fresia Vargas Chunga
{"title":"公共空间:秘鲁利马圣地亚哥德苏尔科区研究","authors":"Ana Sabogal Dunin Borkowski, M. A. Romero, Tarik Tavera Medina, Fresia Vargas Chunga","doi":"10.18800/KAWSAYPACHA.201901.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article seeks to show the gaps that currently have the legal regulations of Lima Metropolitan and the management concerning public spaces. The district of Santiago de Surco is taken as a case study by its heterogeneity in its urban composition, socioeconomic level and content in public spaces. In this area of study, according to criteria previously discussed, representative parks of different economic levels were selected as object of study. In them observations were made on the perception about quality and its relevance for the inhabitants of the district. Despite the fact that there are large parks with a number of activities, they are not under an appropriate legal management system to ensure their maintenance and improvement for the future, and even less to contribute to the quality of life of the neighbors. Throughout the article a contrast between the findings of the literature and the perception of the researchers in relation to the current state of the parks studied as public spaces is developed.","PeriodicalId":34456,"journal":{"name":"Revista Kawsaypacha","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Espacios públicos: estudio del distrito de Santiago de Surco en Lima, Perú\",\"authors\":\"Ana Sabogal Dunin Borkowski, M. A. Romero, Tarik Tavera Medina, Fresia Vargas Chunga\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/KAWSAYPACHA.201901.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present article seeks to show the gaps that currently have the legal regulations of Lima Metropolitan and the management concerning public spaces. The district of Santiago de Surco is taken as a case study by its heterogeneity in its urban composition, socioeconomic level and content in public spaces. In this area of study, according to criteria previously discussed, representative parks of different economic levels were selected as object of study. In them observations were made on the perception about quality and its relevance for the inhabitants of the district. Despite the fact that there are large parks with a number of activities, they are not under an appropriate legal management system to ensure their maintenance and improvement for the future, and even less to contribute to the quality of life of the neighbors. Throughout the article a contrast between the findings of the literature and the perception of the researchers in relation to the current state of the parks studied as public spaces is developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Kawsaypacha\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Kawsaypacha\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/KAWSAYPACHA.201901.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Kawsaypacha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/KAWSAYPACHA.201901.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在说明利马大都会目前在公共空间方面的法律法规和管理方面存在的差距。圣地亚哥德苏尔科区以其城市构成、社会经济水平和公共空间内容的异质性为例进行了研究。在这一研究领域,根据前面讨论的标准,选择不同经济水平的代表性公园作为研究对象。在这些观察中,对质量的看法及其对该地区居民的相关性进行了观察。尽管有大型公园,有许多活动,但它们没有适当的法律管理制度来确保它们的维护和未来的改善,更不用说为邻居的生活质量做出贡献了。在整篇文章中,对比了文献的发现和研究人员对公园现状的看法,研究了公共空间的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Espacios públicos: estudio del distrito de Santiago de Surco en Lima, Perú
The present article seeks to show the gaps that currently have the legal regulations of Lima Metropolitan and the management concerning public spaces. The district of Santiago de Surco is taken as a case study by its heterogeneity in its urban composition, socioeconomic level and content in public spaces. In this area of study, according to criteria previously discussed, representative parks of different economic levels were selected as object of study. In them observations were made on the perception about quality and its relevance for the inhabitants of the district. Despite the fact that there are large parks with a number of activities, they are not under an appropriate legal management system to ensure their maintenance and improvement for the future, and even less to contribute to the quality of life of the neighbors. Throughout the article a contrast between the findings of the literature and the perception of the researchers in relation to the current state of the parks studied as public spaces is developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepción del desempeño ambiental en los empleados de empresas del sector construcción certificadas en ISO 14001 Licencias e impactos ambientales positivos en Colombia. Medidas para potenciar los beneficios ambientales en los territorios Indicadores de vulnerabilidad al cambio climático: un estudio en comunidades pesqueras de Tacna, región al sur del Perú Reflexión introductoria: los bosques del Perú desde una mirada compleja Integrando naturaleza, cultura y desarrollo: el desafío de LXG Capital en un programa de restauración forestal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1