化石燃料生产国的能源政策:全球能源转型重要吗?

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Comparative Economics Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.25428/1824-2979/202001-5-30
Octavio Escobar, Ulises Neri, S. Silvestre
{"title":"化石燃料生产国的能源政策:全球能源转型重要吗?","authors":"Octavio Escobar, Ulises Neri, S. Silvestre","doi":"10.25428/1824-2979/202001-5-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of energy transition can be interpreted in different ways depending on the nature of the agent involved. However, practitioners and existing literature agree that a country’s energy transition is the variation of fossil fuel share in the total primary energy supply (TPES). Public policies mostly focus on changing the energy mix directly or indirectly. However, the production of fossil fuels depends mostly on market-related determinants, including prices and investment in the means of production. But what is the contribution of global energy transition? The objective of this paper is to estimate to which extent public policies related to energy transition affect fossil fuel production in producing countries. For this purpose, we consider as a proxy of energy transition the evolution over 40 years of the TPES of a large panel of fossil fuel–exporting countries, which we compare to its total primary energy production (TPEP). Moreover, we analyze these effects to determine if they differ according to country characteristics, such as its level of development or its membership in OPEC. Finally, we describe the long-run and short-run effects by studying separately the effects of production investments and those of R&D investments in RES technologies.","PeriodicalId":43449,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"5-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy policy of fossil fuel–producing countries: does global energy transition matter?\",\"authors\":\"Octavio Escobar, Ulises Neri, S. Silvestre\",\"doi\":\"10.25428/1824-2979/202001-5-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of energy transition can be interpreted in different ways depending on the nature of the agent involved. However, practitioners and existing literature agree that a country’s energy transition is the variation of fossil fuel share in the total primary energy supply (TPES). Public policies mostly focus on changing the energy mix directly or indirectly. However, the production of fossil fuels depends mostly on market-related determinants, including prices and investment in the means of production. But what is the contribution of global energy transition? The objective of this paper is to estimate to which extent public policies related to energy transition affect fossil fuel production in producing countries. For this purpose, we consider as a proxy of energy transition the evolution over 40 years of the TPES of a large panel of fossil fuel–exporting countries, which we compare to its total primary energy production (TPEP). Moreover, we analyze these effects to determine if they differ according to country characteristics, such as its level of development or its membership in OPEC. Finally, we describe the long-run and short-run effects by studying separately the effects of production investments and those of R&D investments in RES technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Comparative Economics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"5-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Comparative Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/202001-5-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/202001-5-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

能量转换的概念可以用不同的方式解释,这取决于所涉及的主体的性质。然而,从业者和现有文献一致认为,一个国家的能源转型是化石燃料在总一次能源供应(TPES)中所占份额的变化。公共政策大多侧重于直接或间接地改变能源结构。然而,矿物燃料的生产主要取决于与市场有关的决定因素,包括生产资料的价格和投资。但全球能源转型的贡献是什么?本文的目的是估计与能源转型相关的公共政策在多大程度上影响生产国的化石燃料生产。为此,我们将一个大型化石燃料出口国40年来的TPES演变作为能源转型的代表,并将其与一次能源生产总量(TPEP)进行比较。此外,我们分析了这些影响,以确定它们是否根据国家特征而不同,例如其发展水平或其欧佩克成员国身份。最后,通过对可再生能源技术的生产投资效应和研发投资效应的研究,分别描述了长期效应和短期效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy policy of fossil fuel–producing countries: does global energy transition matter?
The concept of energy transition can be interpreted in different ways depending on the nature of the agent involved. However, practitioners and existing literature agree that a country’s energy transition is the variation of fossil fuel share in the total primary energy supply (TPES). Public policies mostly focus on changing the energy mix directly or indirectly. However, the production of fossil fuels depends mostly on market-related determinants, including prices and investment in the means of production. But what is the contribution of global energy transition? The objective of this paper is to estimate to which extent public policies related to energy transition affect fossil fuel production in producing countries. For this purpose, we consider as a proxy of energy transition the evolution over 40 years of the TPES of a large panel of fossil fuel–exporting countries, which we compare to its total primary energy production (TPEP). Moreover, we analyze these effects to determine if they differ according to country characteristics, such as its level of development or its membership in OPEC. Finally, we describe the long-run and short-run effects by studying separately the effects of production investments and those of R&D investments in RES technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Comparative Economics
European Journal of Comparative Economics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Several years have elapsed since the beginning of transition in Eastern Europe, and the profession has learnt a lot about the importance of institutions in the economy and our deep need for additional research on their influence on the interaction of the units that play the economic game. The study of economies that do not fit the paradigm of the competitive market, a field of enquiry that used to belong to the sideline of scientific enquiry, has been joined by leading scientists in the field, who were inspired by the new knowledge gained through the processes of transition and intrigued bthe policy problems posed by transformation of bureaucratically run socialist economies into capitalist market economies. The same institutional and social understanding is equally relevant to questions of conomic development, to the elimination of cleavages between North and South, and to the solution of problems of globalization.
期刊最新文献
Oil price shocks, equity markets, and contagion effect in OECD countries Export-led growth or growth-led exports? Western Europe in the "golden age" Energy policy of fossil fuel–producing countries: does global energy transition matter? Economic integration and exchange rate arrangements in the post-soviet period : The Baltic states in comparative perspective Globalization, regulation and profitability of banks: a comparative analysis of Europe, United States, India and China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1