喀麦隆中部地区罗阿罗阿虫害流行与嗜酸性粒细胞率的相关性研究

Nidelle Tchoupou, Christian Ngounouh Taheu, R. G. Essomba, David Normand Ebonda, Junior Michael Chadou Piameu, A. Bayibéki, P. Ateba, Gilbert Gautier Bong Bong, Philippe Salomon Nguwoh
{"title":"喀麦隆中部地区罗阿罗阿虫害流行与嗜酸性粒细胞率的相关性研究","authors":"Nidelle Tchoupou, Christian Ngounouh Taheu, R. G. Essomba, David Normand Ebonda, Junior Michael Chadou Piameu, A. Bayibéki, P. Ateba, Gilbert Gautier Bong Bong, Philippe Salomon Nguwoh","doi":"10.24018/ejbiomed.2023.2.1.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Loiasis remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) such as Cameroon. In Cameroon, the prevalence of loiasis varies from one geographical area to another. This study aimed to assess the correlation between Loa loa infestation prevalence and eosinophil rate among population of Obout, centre region of Cameroon.\nMethods: A cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted in Obout locality situated in Centre region of Cameroon from June to July 2022. Data were collected using a face-to-face interview questionnaire from participants attending the Christ Roi Medical Centre of Obout (CRMCO). In each participant, a venous blood sample was taken in an EDTA tube after informed consent was obtained. A Full blood count (FBC) and a blood smear were performed on each blood sample. The collected data were recorded in an Excel version 2016 sheet and analysed by statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) v. 24 software. For any value of p˂0.05, the results were considered statistically significant.\nResults: A total of 65 participants were enrolled in this study with a median age of 35 years (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 18-52). The prevalence of Loa loa infestation was 15.38% (95%CI: 7.63%–26.48%) with a high prevalence for males (33.33%) versus (vs.) 2.63% for females (OR= 18.50; 95%IC: 2.17–157.46, p=0.002). Similarly, a high prevalence of Loa loa infestation in participants aged ≥35 years or 27.27% (OR=0.08; 95%IC: 0.01–0.72, p=0.01). Concerning the duration in the locality, the participants with ≥10 years in the locality were more infested with 8.33% for those less than 10 years (p=0.15). Furthermore, the current study shows a positive correlation but weak between eosinophil rate and intensity of Loa loa infestation (r=0.3406; p=0.3).\nConclusion: This study reported a high prevalence of Loa loa microfilaria in Obout locality with statistically significant differences for gender and age. However, no association was found between eosinophil and microfilarial load. Despite the low participation rate, Obout locality remains an area of high endemicity for Loa loa microfilaria.","PeriodicalId":72970,"journal":{"name":"European journal of biomedical research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between Loa Loa Infestation Prevalence and Eosinophil Rate among Population of Obout, Centre Region of Cameroon\",\"authors\":\"Nidelle Tchoupou, Christian Ngounouh Taheu, R. G. Essomba, David Normand Ebonda, Junior Michael Chadou Piameu, A. Bayibéki, P. Ateba, Gilbert Gautier Bong Bong, Philippe Salomon Nguwoh\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejbiomed.2023.2.1.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Loiasis remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) such as Cameroon. In Cameroon, the prevalence of loiasis varies from one geographical area to another. This study aimed to assess the correlation between Loa loa infestation prevalence and eosinophil rate among population of Obout, centre region of Cameroon.\\nMethods: A cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted in Obout locality situated in Centre region of Cameroon from June to July 2022. Data were collected using a face-to-face interview questionnaire from participants attending the Christ Roi Medical Centre of Obout (CRMCO). In each participant, a venous blood sample was taken in an EDTA tube after informed consent was obtained. A Full blood count (FBC) and a blood smear were performed on each blood sample. The collected data were recorded in an Excel version 2016 sheet and analysed by statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) v. 24 software. For any value of p˂0.05, the results were considered statistically significant.\\nResults: A total of 65 participants were enrolled in this study with a median age of 35 years (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 18-52). The prevalence of Loa loa infestation was 15.38% (95%CI: 7.63%–26.48%) with a high prevalence for males (33.33%) versus (vs.) 2.63% for females (OR= 18.50; 95%IC: 2.17–157.46, p=0.002). Similarly, a high prevalence of Loa loa infestation in participants aged ≥35 years or 27.27% (OR=0.08; 95%IC: 0.01–0.72, p=0.01). Concerning the duration in the locality, the participants with ≥10 years in the locality were more infested with 8.33% for those less than 10 years (p=0.15). Furthermore, the current study shows a positive correlation but weak between eosinophil rate and intensity of Loa loa infestation (r=0.3406; p=0.3).\\nConclusion: This study reported a high prevalence of Loa loa microfilaria in Obout locality with statistically significant differences for gender and age. However, no association was found between eosinophil and microfilarial load. Despite the low participation rate, Obout locality remains an area of high endemicity for Loa loa microfilaria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of biomedical research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of biomedical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbiomed.2023.2.1.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbiomed.2023.2.1.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲(如喀麦隆),路易丝虫病仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题。在喀麦隆,风湿病的流行因地理区域而异。本研究旨在评估喀麦隆中部约乌特地区人群中罗阿罗阿侵染流行率与嗜酸性粒细胞率之间的相关性。方法:于2022年6 - 7月在喀麦隆中部约乌特地区进行横断面和相关性研究。数据收集采用面对面访谈问卷从参加基督Roi医疗中心(CRMCO)的参与者。在每位参与者获得知情同意后,在EDTA管中采集静脉血样本。对每个血液样本进行全血细胞计数(FBC)和血液涂片。收集的数据记录在Excel 2016版表格中,并使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) v. 24软件进行分析。对于p小于0.05的任何值,结果都被认为具有统计学意义。结果:本研究共纳入65名参与者,中位年龄为35岁(四分位间距[IQR]: 18-52岁)。罗阿罗阿侵染率为15.38% (95%CI: 7.63% ~ 26.48%),男性(33.33%)比女性(2.63%)高(OR= 18.50;95%IC: 2.17-157.46, p=0.002)。同样,年龄≥35岁的参与者中Loa Loa侵染的高发率为27.27% (or =0.08;95%IC: 0.01 ~ 0.72, p=0.01)。从在地停留时间来看,在地≥10年的鼠患率高于10年以下的鼠患率(8.33%)(p=0.15)。此外,本研究显示嗜酸性粒细胞率与Loa Loa侵染强度呈正相关,但呈弱相关(r=0.3406;p = 0.3)。结论:该研究报告了约乌市罗阿罗阿微丝虫的高流行率,性别和年龄差异有统计学意义。然而,没有发现嗜酸性粒细胞和微丝虫负荷之间的关联。尽管参与率低,但约out地区仍然是Loa Loa微丝虫的高流行区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation between Loa Loa Infestation Prevalence and Eosinophil Rate among Population of Obout, Centre Region of Cameroon
Background: Loiasis remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) such as Cameroon. In Cameroon, the prevalence of loiasis varies from one geographical area to another. This study aimed to assess the correlation between Loa loa infestation prevalence and eosinophil rate among population of Obout, centre region of Cameroon. Methods: A cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted in Obout locality situated in Centre region of Cameroon from June to July 2022. Data were collected using a face-to-face interview questionnaire from participants attending the Christ Roi Medical Centre of Obout (CRMCO). In each participant, a venous blood sample was taken in an EDTA tube after informed consent was obtained. A Full blood count (FBC) and a blood smear were performed on each blood sample. The collected data were recorded in an Excel version 2016 sheet and analysed by statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) v. 24 software. For any value of p˂0.05, the results were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 65 participants were enrolled in this study with a median age of 35 years (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 18-52). The prevalence of Loa loa infestation was 15.38% (95%CI: 7.63%–26.48%) with a high prevalence for males (33.33%) versus (vs.) 2.63% for females (OR= 18.50; 95%IC: 2.17–157.46, p=0.002). Similarly, a high prevalence of Loa loa infestation in participants aged ≥35 years or 27.27% (OR=0.08; 95%IC: 0.01–0.72, p=0.01). Concerning the duration in the locality, the participants with ≥10 years in the locality were more infested with 8.33% for those less than 10 years (p=0.15). Furthermore, the current study shows a positive correlation but weak between eosinophil rate and intensity of Loa loa infestation (r=0.3406; p=0.3). Conclusion: This study reported a high prevalence of Loa loa microfilaria in Obout locality with statistically significant differences for gender and age. However, no association was found between eosinophil and microfilarial load. Despite the low participation rate, Obout locality remains an area of high endemicity for Loa loa microfilaria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioinformatics Techniques for Developing Molecular Detection Methods for the HIV-1 Gag Gene Cytomorphological Analysis of Liquid PRF Produced with DUO Fixed Angle Centrifuge (Process, France) Amplification of Sars-Cov2 Viral Markers in Côte d’Ivoire Letrozole and HFD_HG on Insulin and GDP Vaccination Rate for COVID-19 in a Primary Healthcare Center in Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1