机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术后尽早出院回家。

IF 2.1 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Numerische Mathematik Pub Date : 2022-06-15 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivac134
Alexander Spanjersberg, Leendert Hoek, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Thi-Yen Nguyen, Emel Kaplan, Roland Laurens, Sandeep Singh
{"title":"机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术后尽早出院回家。","authors":"Alexander Spanjersberg, Leendert Hoek, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Thi-Yen Nguyen, Emel Kaplan, Roland Laurens, Sandeep Singh","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivac134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been developed as a less invasive alternative for conventional CABG to enhance postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction and early discharge to home. Furthermore, it may provide a basis for hybrid coronary revascularization. To determine the feasibility of this procedure, we compared robot-assisted with conventional off-pump CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing a robot-assisted left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending coronary artery procedure were compared to consecutive patients undergoing conventional off-pump CABG for single-vessel disease from October 2016 to July 2019. The primary outcome was discharge to home within 5 days after the operation. Secondary outcomes were total hospital stay, reoperations within 48 h, transfusions, atrial fibrillation, 30-day mortality and quality of life 1 month postoperatively. A propensity matched cohort was assembled to correct for possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients who had robot-assisted CABG were compared to 194 patients who had conventional off-pump CABG. The primary outcome was reached in 51% of the robot-assisted group versus 19% of the conventional off-pump group (P < 0.01). The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days for the robot-assisted group versus 7 days in the conventional off-pump group (P < 0.01). Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups, and the quality of life 1 month after the operation was equal. The results after propensity matching were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early discharge to home is more frequent for patients who have robot-assisted CABG than in those who have conventional off-pump CABG, with no difference in health-related quality of life. Therefore, this approach may reduce healthcare resources and provide a solid basis for hybrid coronary revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49733,"journal":{"name":"Numerische Mathematik","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early home discharge after robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Spanjersberg, Leendert Hoek, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Thi-Yen Nguyen, Emel Kaplan, Roland Laurens, Sandeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivac134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been developed as a less invasive alternative for conventional CABG to enhance postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction and early discharge to home. Furthermore, it may provide a basis for hybrid coronary revascularization. To determine the feasibility of this procedure, we compared robot-assisted with conventional off-pump CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing a robot-assisted left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending coronary artery procedure were compared to consecutive patients undergoing conventional off-pump CABG for single-vessel disease from October 2016 to July 2019. The primary outcome was discharge to home within 5 days after the operation. Secondary outcomes were total hospital stay, reoperations within 48 h, transfusions, atrial fibrillation, 30-day mortality and quality of life 1 month postoperatively. A propensity matched cohort was assembled to correct for possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients who had robot-assisted CABG were compared to 194 patients who had conventional off-pump CABG. The primary outcome was reached in 51% of the robot-assisted group versus 19% of the conventional off-pump group (P < 0.01). The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days for the robot-assisted group versus 7 days in the conventional off-pump group (P < 0.01). Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups, and the quality of life 1 month after the operation was equal. The results after propensity matching were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early discharge to home is more frequent for patients who have robot-assisted CABG than in those who have conventional off-pump CABG, with no difference in health-related quality of life. Therefore, this approach may reduce healthcare resources and provide a solid basis for hybrid coronary revascularization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Numerische Mathematik\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Numerische Mathematik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac134\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Numerische Mathematik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)已被开发为传统 CABG 的微创替代手术,以提高术后恢复、患者满意度和尽早出院回家。此外,它还可为混合冠状动脉血运重建提供基础。为了确定这种手术的可行性,我们对机器人辅助和传统的非泵 CABG 进行了比较:将 2016 年 10 月至 2019 年 7 月期间接受机器人辅助左乳内动脉至左前降支冠状动脉手术的所有连续患者与接受常规非体外循环 CABG 治疗单血管疾病的连续患者进行比较。主要结果是术后 5 天内出院回家。次要结果是总住院时间、48小时内再次手术、输血、心房颤动、30天死亡率和术后1个月的生活质量。为了校正可能存在的混杂因素,我们建立了倾向匹配队列:共有107名患者接受了机器人辅助心血管造影术,194名患者接受了传统的非体外循环心血管造影术。51%的机器人辅助组患者达到了主要结果,而19%的传统非体外循环组患者达到了主要结果(P 结论:机器人辅助CABG术后早期出院更常见:接受机器人辅助心血管造影术的患者比接受传统非体外循环心血管造影术的患者更容易提前出院回家,但在健康相关生活质量方面没有差异。因此,这种方法可以减少医疗资源,并为混合冠状动脉血运重建提供坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early home discharge after robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objectives: Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been developed as a less invasive alternative for conventional CABG to enhance postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction and early discharge to home. Furthermore, it may provide a basis for hybrid coronary revascularization. To determine the feasibility of this procedure, we compared robot-assisted with conventional off-pump CABG.

Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing a robot-assisted left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending coronary artery procedure were compared to consecutive patients undergoing conventional off-pump CABG for single-vessel disease from October 2016 to July 2019. The primary outcome was discharge to home within 5 days after the operation. Secondary outcomes were total hospital stay, reoperations within 48 h, transfusions, atrial fibrillation, 30-day mortality and quality of life 1 month postoperatively. A propensity matched cohort was assembled to correct for possible confounders.

Results: A total of 107 patients who had robot-assisted CABG were compared to 194 patients who had conventional off-pump CABG. The primary outcome was reached in 51% of the robot-assisted group versus 19% of the conventional off-pump group (P < 0.01). The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days for the robot-assisted group versus 7 days in the conventional off-pump group (P < 0.01). Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups, and the quality of life 1 month after the operation was equal. The results after propensity matching were similar.

Conclusions: Early discharge to home is more frequent for patients who have robot-assisted CABG than in those who have conventional off-pump CABG, with no difference in health-related quality of life. Therefore, this approach may reduce healthcare resources and provide a solid basis for hybrid coronary revascularization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Numerische Mathematik
Numerische Mathematik 数学-应用数学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Numerische Mathematik publishes papers of the very highest quality presenting significantly new and important developments in all areas of Numerical Analysis. "Numerical Analysis" is here understood in its most general sense, as that part of Mathematics that covers: 1. The conception and mathematical analysis of efficient numerical schemes actually used on computers (the "core" of Numerical Analysis) 2. Optimization and Control Theory 3. Mathematical Modeling 4. The mathematical aspects of Scientific Computing
期刊最新文献
The pressure-wired Stokes element: a mesh-robust version of the Scott–Vogelius element Mathematical analysis of a finite difference method for inhomogeneous incompressible Navier–Stokes equations A moment approach for entropy solutions of parameter-dependent hyperbolic conservation laws Circuits of ferromagnetic nanowires Efficient approximation of high-frequency Helmholtz solutions by Gaussian coherent states
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1