佛罗里达州疫苗接种点空间可达性差异评估

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Annals of GIS Pub Date : 2022-01-16 DOI:10.1080/19475683.2022.2026474
Kyusik Kim, M. Ghorbanzadeh, M. Horner, E. Ozguven
{"title":"佛罗里达州疫苗接种点空间可达性差异评估","authors":"Kyusik Kim, M. Ghorbanzadeh, M. Horner, E. Ozguven","doi":"10.1080/19475683.2022.2026474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community-wide vaccinations would be the most effective way to end the COVID-19 pandemic, and accessing vaccination sites would be central in this nexus. Given that the number of COVID-19 vaccines was limited to certain groups of people in the early phases of vaccine distribution, age-based prioritization may have overlooked differences in income levels and the races/ethnicities among older populations. In this vein, using two spatial accessibility measures based on spatially disaggregated hexagons, this paper assesses the disparities in spatial accessibility to vaccination sites with consideration of older populations’ (65+) income levels and their races/ethnicities at the state and the county level. To evaluate the disparities and identify counties with the greatest disparities, a non-parametric two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test at the state level and the statistic at the county level are implemented. The findings of this study indicate that older blacks, older Hispanics, and older populations below the poverty level had better access compared to older whites, older non-Hispanics, and older populations above the poverty level, respectively, at the state level, whereas access disparities varied at counties and geographic locales. We thus conclude that policymakers should take into account older populations’ income levels and races/ethnicities for vaccine prioritization and should pay attention to counties with relatively high disparities in spatial access to vaccines.","PeriodicalId":46270,"journal":{"name":"Annals of GIS","volume":"4 1","pages":"263 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of disparities in spatial accessibility to vaccination sites in Florida\",\"authors\":\"Kyusik Kim, M. Ghorbanzadeh, M. Horner, E. Ozguven\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19475683.2022.2026474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Community-wide vaccinations would be the most effective way to end the COVID-19 pandemic, and accessing vaccination sites would be central in this nexus. Given that the number of COVID-19 vaccines was limited to certain groups of people in the early phases of vaccine distribution, age-based prioritization may have overlooked differences in income levels and the races/ethnicities among older populations. In this vein, using two spatial accessibility measures based on spatially disaggregated hexagons, this paper assesses the disparities in spatial accessibility to vaccination sites with consideration of older populations’ (65+) income levels and their races/ethnicities at the state and the county level. To evaluate the disparities and identify counties with the greatest disparities, a non-parametric two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test at the state level and the statistic at the county level are implemented. The findings of this study indicate that older blacks, older Hispanics, and older populations below the poverty level had better access compared to older whites, older non-Hispanics, and older populations above the poverty level, respectively, at the state level, whereas access disparities varied at counties and geographic locales. We thus conclude that policymakers should take into account older populations’ income levels and races/ethnicities for vaccine prioritization and should pay attention to counties with relatively high disparities in spatial access to vaccines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of GIS\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of GIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2022.2026474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of GIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2022.2026474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

社区范围的疫苗接种将是结束COVID-19大流行的最有效方法,而进入疫苗接种点将是这一关系的核心。鉴于在疫苗分发的早期阶段,COVID-19疫苗的数量仅限于某些人群,基于年龄的优先顺序可能忽略了老年人群中收入水平和种族/民族的差异。在此基础上,本文采用基于空间分解六边形的两种空间可达性测度,在考虑老年人(65岁以上)收入水平和种族的情况下,对州、县两级老年人接种点的空间可达性差异进行了评价。为了评估差异并确定差异最大的县,在州一级实施了非参数双样本Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验,在县一级实施了统计。本研究的结果表明,在州一级,老年黑人、老年西班牙裔和贫困水平以下的老年人口分别比老年白人、老年非西班牙裔和老年贫困水平以上的人口有更好的获得机会,而在县和地理位置上存在差异。因此,我们得出结论,政策制定者应考虑老年人的收入水平和种族/民族,以确定疫苗的优先顺序,并应注意在疫苗获取空间上存在相对较大差异的县。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of disparities in spatial accessibility to vaccination sites in Florida
ABSTRACT Community-wide vaccinations would be the most effective way to end the COVID-19 pandemic, and accessing vaccination sites would be central in this nexus. Given that the number of COVID-19 vaccines was limited to certain groups of people in the early phases of vaccine distribution, age-based prioritization may have overlooked differences in income levels and the races/ethnicities among older populations. In this vein, using two spatial accessibility measures based on spatially disaggregated hexagons, this paper assesses the disparities in spatial accessibility to vaccination sites with consideration of older populations’ (65+) income levels and their races/ethnicities at the state and the county level. To evaluate the disparities and identify counties with the greatest disparities, a non-parametric two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test at the state level and the statistic at the county level are implemented. The findings of this study indicate that older blacks, older Hispanics, and older populations below the poverty level had better access compared to older whites, older non-Hispanics, and older populations above the poverty level, respectively, at the state level, whereas access disparities varied at counties and geographic locales. We thus conclude that policymakers should take into account older populations’ income levels and races/ethnicities for vaccine prioritization and should pay attention to counties with relatively high disparities in spatial access to vaccines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of GIS
Annals of GIS Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Zero watermarking algorithm for BIM data based on distance partitioning and local feature Controlling for spatial confounding and spatial interference in causal inference: modelling insights from a computational experiment Application of GIS and fuzzy sets to small-scale site suitability assessment for extensive brackish water aquaculture Revealing intra-urban hierarchical spatial structure through representation learning by combining road network abstraction model and taxi trajectory data The time- and distance-decay effects of hurricane relevancy on social media: an empirical study of three hurricanes in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1