创新和进步模式的转变

R. Eckersley
{"title":"创新和进步模式的转变","authors":"R. Eckersley","doi":"10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over two centuries, technological innovation has been closely linked to the notion of progress, especially in developed nations. Progress has been largely defined and measured in material - that is, economic - terms, and research and development (R and D) have been directed increasingly towards improving economic performance. The fundamental assumptions behind 'going for growth' are that it enhances welfare and is sustainable. But does it and is it? The relationships between economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability are coming under close and critical scrutiny in the research community. This debate has important implications for strategic planning for R and D.","PeriodicalId":13564,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation and shifting paradigms of progress\",\"authors\":\"R. Eckersley\",\"doi\":\"10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For over two centuries, technological innovation has been closely linked to the notion of progress, especially in developed nations. Progress has been largely defined and measured in material - that is, economic - terms, and research and development (R and D) have been directed increasingly towards improving economic performance. The fundamental assumptions behind 'going for growth' are that it enhances welfare and is sustainable. But does it and is it? The relationships between economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability are coming under close and critical scrutiny in the research community. This debate has important implications for strategic planning for R and D.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

两个多世纪以来,技术创新一直与进步的概念密切相关,尤其是在发达国家。进步在很大程度上是用物质即经济术语来定义和衡量的,研究和发展(R and D)越来越多地指向改善经济绩效。“追求增长”背后的基本假设是,它能提高福利,而且是可持续的。但这是真的吗?经济增长、生活质量和生态可持续性之间的关系正受到研究界密切而关键的审视。这场辩论对研发的战略规划具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovation and shifting paradigms of progress
For over two centuries, technological innovation has been closely linked to the notion of progress, especially in developed nations. Progress has been largely defined and measured in material - that is, economic - terms, and research and development (R and D) have been directed increasingly towards improving economic performance. The fundamental assumptions behind 'going for growth' are that it enhances welfare and is sustainable. But does it and is it? The relationships between economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability are coming under close and critical scrutiny in the research community. This debate has important implications for strategic planning for R and D.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Study: KACST Technology Innovation Centers (TICs): The Case of the TIC in Radio Frequency and Photonics for the e-Society Social capital and investment in agriculture: three networks converge with implications for Australia’s rural research system Research Note: The U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Initiative: Will it be Implemented as an Innovation – or Industrial – Policy? THE USE OF AUTOMAKERS’ KNOWLEDGE IN THE COMPONENTS SUPPLIER’S INNOVATIONS: DIFFERENT EFFECTS IN DIFFERENT SITUATIONS The institutional framework of inter- and intra-organizational transferred knowledge applying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1