{"title":"创新和进步模式的转变","authors":"R. Eckersley","doi":"10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over two centuries, technological innovation has been closely linked to the notion of progress, especially in developed nations. Progress has been largely defined and measured in material - that is, economic - terms, and research and development (R and D) have been directed increasingly towards improving economic performance. The fundamental assumptions behind 'going for growth' are that it enhances welfare and is sustainable. But does it and is it? The relationships between economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability are coming under close and critical scrutiny in the research community. This debate has important implications for strategic planning for R and D.","PeriodicalId":13564,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation and shifting paradigms of progress\",\"authors\":\"R. Eckersley\",\"doi\":\"10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For over two centuries, technological innovation has been closely linked to the notion of progress, especially in developed nations. Progress has been largely defined and measured in material - that is, economic - terms, and research and development (R and D) have been directed increasingly towards improving economic performance. The fundamental assumptions behind 'going for growth' are that it enhances welfare and is sustainable. But does it and is it? The relationships between economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability are coming under close and critical scrutiny in the research community. This debate has important implications for strategic planning for R and D.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"26-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.1998.1.2-3.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
两个多世纪以来,技术创新一直与进步的概念密切相关,尤其是在发达国家。进步在很大程度上是用物质即经济术语来定义和衡量的,研究和发展(R and D)越来越多地指向改善经济绩效。“追求增长”背后的基本假设是,它能提高福利,而且是可持续的。但这是真的吗?经济增长、生活质量和生态可持续性之间的关系正受到研究界密切而关键的审视。这场辩论对研发的战略规划具有重要意义。
For over two centuries, technological innovation has been closely linked to the notion of progress, especially in developed nations. Progress has been largely defined and measured in material - that is, economic - terms, and research and development (R and D) have been directed increasingly towards improving economic performance. The fundamental assumptions behind 'going for growth' are that it enhances welfare and is sustainable. But does it and is it? The relationships between economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability are coming under close and critical scrutiny in the research community. This debate has important implications for strategic planning for R and D.