家禽肯塔基沙门氏菌菌株和其他与家禽相关的沙门氏菌血清型在紫菜肉汤中膜膜形成的非分子特征

Zhaohao Shi, D. Dittoe, S. Ricke
{"title":"家禽肯塔基沙门氏菌菌株和其他与家禽相关的沙门氏菌血清型在紫菜肉汤中膜膜形成的非分子特征","authors":"Zhaohao Shi, D. Dittoe, S. Ricke","doi":"10.1080/03601234.2019.1661210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is limited research concerning the biofilm-forming capabilities of Salmonella Kentucky, a common poultry isolate. The objective was to quantitate pellicle formation of S. Kentucky versus better-characterized Salmonella strains of Enteritidis and Heidelberg. In separate experiments, Salmonella strains and serovars were tested for their biofilm-forming abilities in different Luria-Bertani (LB) broths (1); pellicle formation in different volumes of LB without salt (2); and the potential priming effects on formation after pellicles were transferred three consecutive times (3). Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA with means separated using Tukey’s HSD (P ≤ 0.05). In the first experiment, there was no significant effect between strain and serovars (P > 0.05), but media type affected pellicle formation significantly with LB Miller and LB minus NaCl plus 2% glucose resulting in no pellicle formation (P < 0.001). When grown in 50 mL, Kentucky 38-0085 produced larger pellicles than Kentucky 38-0055, and Heidelberg strain 38-0127 (P < 0.0001). Serial transfers of pellicles did not significantly affect pellicle formation (P > 0.05); however, Kentucky 38-0084, 38-0085 and 38-0086 produced larger pellicles than Kentucky 38-0055 and 38-0056 and Heidelberg 38-0126, 38-0127 and 38-0152. The current study demonstrates the consistent biofilm forming capabilities of Kentucky and may explain why Kentucky is frequently isolated in poultry processing facilities.","PeriodicalId":15670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B","volume":"85 1","pages":"972 - 978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-molecular characterization of pellicle formation by poultry Salmonella Kentucky strains and other poultry-associated Salmonella serovars in Luria Bertani broth\",\"authors\":\"Zhaohao Shi, D. Dittoe, S. Ricke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03601234.2019.1661210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There is limited research concerning the biofilm-forming capabilities of Salmonella Kentucky, a common poultry isolate. The objective was to quantitate pellicle formation of S. Kentucky versus better-characterized Salmonella strains of Enteritidis and Heidelberg. In separate experiments, Salmonella strains and serovars were tested for their biofilm-forming abilities in different Luria-Bertani (LB) broths (1); pellicle formation in different volumes of LB without salt (2); and the potential priming effects on formation after pellicles were transferred three consecutive times (3). Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA with means separated using Tukey’s HSD (P ≤ 0.05). In the first experiment, there was no significant effect between strain and serovars (P > 0.05), but media type affected pellicle formation significantly with LB Miller and LB minus NaCl plus 2% glucose resulting in no pellicle formation (P < 0.001). When grown in 50 mL, Kentucky 38-0085 produced larger pellicles than Kentucky 38-0055, and Heidelberg strain 38-0127 (P < 0.0001). Serial transfers of pellicles did not significantly affect pellicle formation (P > 0.05); however, Kentucky 38-0084, 38-0085 and 38-0086 produced larger pellicles than Kentucky 38-0055 and 38-0056 and Heidelberg 38-0126, 38-0127 and 38-0152. The current study demonstrates the consistent biofilm forming capabilities of Kentucky and may explain why Kentucky is frequently isolated in poultry processing facilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"972 - 978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2019.1661210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2019.1661210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要关于肯塔基沙门氏菌(一种常见的家禽分离物)的生物膜形成能力的研究有限。目的是量化肯塔基沙门氏菌与肠炎沙门氏菌和海德堡沙门氏菌的膜形成。在单独的实验中,对沙门氏菌菌株和血清型在不同的Luria-Bertani (LB)肉汤中的生物膜形成能力进行了测试(1);不同体积无盐LB的膜膜形成(2);以及连续三次转移后对细胞膜形成的潜在启动效应(3)。数据采用单因素方差分析(One-Way ANOVA),均数采用Tukey’s HSD分离(P≤0.05)。在第一个试验中,菌株和血清型对膜膜形成无显著影响(P > 0.05),但培养基类型对膜膜形成有显著影响,LB Miller和LB - NaCl + 2%葡萄糖对膜膜形成无显著影响(P 0.05);然而,肯塔基38-0084、38-0085和38-0086比肯塔基38-0055、38-0056和海德堡38-0126、38-0127和38-0152生产的薄膜更大。目前的研究证明了肯塔基州一贯的生物膜形成能力,这可能解释了为什么肯塔基州在家禽加工设施中经常被隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-molecular characterization of pellicle formation by poultry Salmonella Kentucky strains and other poultry-associated Salmonella serovars in Luria Bertani broth
Abstract There is limited research concerning the biofilm-forming capabilities of Salmonella Kentucky, a common poultry isolate. The objective was to quantitate pellicle formation of S. Kentucky versus better-characterized Salmonella strains of Enteritidis and Heidelberg. In separate experiments, Salmonella strains and serovars were tested for their biofilm-forming abilities in different Luria-Bertani (LB) broths (1); pellicle formation in different volumes of LB without salt (2); and the potential priming effects on formation after pellicles were transferred three consecutive times (3). Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA with means separated using Tukey’s HSD (P ≤ 0.05). In the first experiment, there was no significant effect between strain and serovars (P > 0.05), but media type affected pellicle formation significantly with LB Miller and LB minus NaCl plus 2% glucose resulting in no pellicle formation (P < 0.001). When grown in 50 mL, Kentucky 38-0085 produced larger pellicles than Kentucky 38-0055, and Heidelberg strain 38-0127 (P < 0.0001). Serial transfers of pellicles did not significantly affect pellicle formation (P > 0.05); however, Kentucky 38-0084, 38-0085 and 38-0086 produced larger pellicles than Kentucky 38-0055 and 38-0056 and Heidelberg 38-0126, 38-0127 and 38-0152. The current study demonstrates the consistent biofilm forming capabilities of Kentucky and may explain why Kentucky is frequently isolated in poultry processing facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MoS2_CNTs_aerogel-based PEDOT nanocomposite electrochemical sensor for simultaneous detection of chloramphenicol and furazolidone in food samples. Persistence and degradation of tembotrione in loamy soil: Effect of various organic amendments, moisture regimes and temperatures Vortex-assisted dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction using silica-supported Fe2O3-modified khat (Catha edulis) biochar nanocomposite followed by GC-MS for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in juice samples In vitro and in vivo screening of bacterial species from contaminated soil for heavy metal biotransformation activity Effects of imidacloprid on the survival and biomarker responses of Eristalis tenax larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae): a comparative study between indoor and outdoor exposures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1