南非犹太人离婚的性别平等

Waheeda Amien, K. Rajwani
{"title":"南非犹太人离婚的性别平等","authors":"Waheeda Amien, K. Rajwani","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2020.1837465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores potential solutions to address the unequal access of Jewish women to religious divorce known as a get in the legal context of South Africa. We assess rabbinical and state (judicial and legislative) responses to the issue of get refusal in Orthodox and Conservative South African Jewish communities and show that there are significant limitations to the effectiveness of their responses. By drawing on South African case law and parallel rulings on religious entanglement in the United States of America, we illustrate the legal viability of judicial enforcement of a ketubah (Jewish marriage contract) in South Africa. In particular, we argue that inclusion, recognition, and enforcement of maintenance clauses in the ketubah by South African courts can incentivize recalcitrant husbands to issue a get. We further address the need for legislation to solidify the judicial enforceability of a ketubah, thereby ensuring timely and equitable access to religious divorce for Jewish women in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":44432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equalizing gendered access to Jewish divorce in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Waheeda Amien, K. Rajwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07329113.2020.1837465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores potential solutions to address the unequal access of Jewish women to religious divorce known as a get in the legal context of South Africa. We assess rabbinical and state (judicial and legislative) responses to the issue of get refusal in Orthodox and Conservative South African Jewish communities and show that there are significant limitations to the effectiveness of their responses. By drawing on South African case law and parallel rulings on religious entanglement in the United States of America, we illustrate the legal viability of judicial enforcement of a ketubah (Jewish marriage contract) in South Africa. In particular, we argue that inclusion, recognition, and enforcement of maintenance clauses in the ketubah by South African courts can incentivize recalcitrant husbands to issue a get. We further address the need for legislation to solidify the judicial enforceability of a ketubah, thereby ensuring timely and equitable access to religious divorce for Jewish women in South Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1837465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1837465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了潜在的解决方案,以解决犹太妇女在南非的法律背景下获得宗教离婚的不平等机会。我们评估了拉比和国家(司法和立法)对正统和保守的南非犹太社区拒绝获得问题的反应,并表明他们的反应的有效性存在显着的局限性。通过借鉴南非的判例法和美国关于宗教纠纷的平行裁决,我们说明了司法执行ketubah(犹太婚姻契约)在南非的法律可行性。特别是,我们认为,南非法院在ketubah中纳入、承认和执行赡养条款可以激励不听话的丈夫签发离婚证书。我们进一步讨论立法的必要性,以巩固ketubah的司法可执行性,从而确保南非犹太妇女及时和平等地获得宗教离婚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equalizing gendered access to Jewish divorce in South Africa
Abstract This paper explores potential solutions to address the unequal access of Jewish women to religious divorce known as a get in the legal context of South Africa. We assess rabbinical and state (judicial and legislative) responses to the issue of get refusal in Orthodox and Conservative South African Jewish communities and show that there are significant limitations to the effectiveness of their responses. By drawing on South African case law and parallel rulings on religious entanglement in the United States of America, we illustrate the legal viability of judicial enforcement of a ketubah (Jewish marriage contract) in South Africa. In particular, we argue that inclusion, recognition, and enforcement of maintenance clauses in the ketubah by South African courts can incentivize recalcitrant husbands to issue a get. We further address the need for legislation to solidify the judicial enforceability of a ketubah, thereby ensuring timely and equitable access to religious divorce for Jewish women in South Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.
期刊最新文献
Construing the transformed property paradigm of South Africa’s water law: new opportunities presented by legal pluralism? Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law Interview article: water movements’ defense of the right to water. From the European arena to the Dutch exception Scientific versus folk legal pluralism An exploration of legal pluralism, power and custom in South Africa. A conversation with Aninka Claassens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1