作为治国之道的不确定性:家庭运动对抗消失

Amina Zarrugh
{"title":"作为治国之道的不确定性:家庭运动对抗消失","authors":"Amina Zarrugh","doi":"10.1353/wsq.2023.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:State violence, particularly in the form of enforced disappearance, is designed to terrorize publics and quell organized forms of dissent. Most fundamentally, however, disappearance as a form of violence operates to disrupt family and kin-based bonds. In this article, I outline how family has emerged as a mobilizing framework to contest enforced disappearance, driven largely in response to how states produce a pervasive sense of uncertainty and liminality for women and their families living in the aftermath of a relative's disappearance. Drawing on an interdisciplinary literature that foregrounds Butler's (2006) notion of \"grievability,\" I detail how the effects of disappearance lay the groundwork for social movements to mobilize under the rubric of family to dispute state-based assertions that the disappeared are \"unmournable.\" Family-based social movements against disappearance highlight the contradictions between the valorized position of \"family\" in many state ideologies and the disruptions to families wrought by state violence.","PeriodicalId":23857,"journal":{"name":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","volume":"17 1","pages":"115 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty as Statecraft: Family Movements Contesting Disappearance\",\"authors\":\"Amina Zarrugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wsq.2023.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:State violence, particularly in the form of enforced disappearance, is designed to terrorize publics and quell organized forms of dissent. Most fundamentally, however, disappearance as a form of violence operates to disrupt family and kin-based bonds. In this article, I outline how family has emerged as a mobilizing framework to contest enforced disappearance, driven largely in response to how states produce a pervasive sense of uncertainty and liminality for women and their families living in the aftermath of a relative's disappearance. Drawing on an interdisciplinary literature that foregrounds Butler's (2006) notion of \\\"grievability,\\\" I detail how the effects of disappearance lay the groundwork for social movements to mobilize under the rubric of family to dispute state-based assertions that the disappeared are \\\"unmournable.\\\" Family-based social movements against disappearance highlight the contradictions between the valorized position of \\\"family\\\" in many state ideologies and the disruptions to families wrought by state violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2023.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2023.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:国家暴力,特别是以强迫失踪的形式,旨在恐吓公众和镇压有组织的不同意见。然而,最根本的是,失踪作为一种暴力形式,破坏了家庭和以亲属为基础的纽带。在这篇文章中,我概述了家庭是如何成为一个动员框架来反对强迫失踪的,主要是为了回应国家如何对亲人失踪后生活的妇女及其家人产生普遍的不确定性和限制感。在巴特勒(2006)的“悲情”概念的基础上,我详细介绍了失踪的影响如何为社会运动奠定基础,这些运动在家庭的名义下动员起来,对基于国家的断言提出异议,即失踪者是“不可哀悼的”。以家庭为基础的反失踪社会运动突出了许多国家意识形态中“家庭”的崇高地位与国家暴力对家庭造成的破坏之间的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertainty as Statecraft: Family Movements Contesting Disappearance
Abstract:State violence, particularly in the form of enforced disappearance, is designed to terrorize publics and quell organized forms of dissent. Most fundamentally, however, disappearance as a form of violence operates to disrupt family and kin-based bonds. In this article, I outline how family has emerged as a mobilizing framework to contest enforced disappearance, driven largely in response to how states produce a pervasive sense of uncertainty and liminality for women and their families living in the aftermath of a relative's disappearance. Drawing on an interdisciplinary literature that foregrounds Butler's (2006) notion of "grievability," I detail how the effects of disappearance lay the groundwork for social movements to mobilize under the rubric of family to dispute state-based assertions that the disappeared are "unmournable." Family-based social movements against disappearance highlight the contradictions between the valorized position of "family" in many state ideologies and the disruptions to families wrought by state violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Education "in the Belly of the Monster": The Third World Women's Alliance's "Tuesday Schedule" Queering Morales v. Turman: Gender, Sexuality, and Juveniles' Right to Treatment "We Wanted to Talk Plumbing": Organizing and Mutual Aid in Baltimore's High-Rise Public Housing Uncertainty as Statecraft: Family Movements Contesting Disappearance Selections from Triple Jeopardy 1, no. 1 (September-October 1971)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1