空间发展战略的制度问题

Q4 Social Sciences Perspectives on Federalism Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98
E. Bukhvald
{"title":"空间发展战略的制度问题","authors":"E. Bukhvald","doi":"10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 for the period up to 2025 not only remains in the “field of view” of economic theorists and practitioners of public administration, but also in many ways continues to embody the complexity and inconsistency of the strategic planning system in the country. Of course, we have to admit that many of the initial assumptions of the development of this Strategy did not work out quite well. Thus, to date, it has not been possible to adopt the Concept of State Regional Policy, which has been repeatedly proposed in different versions, and on this basis to carry out a meaningful and targeted differentiation of the concepts of “regional” and “spatial” development. Contrary to the logic of the preparation of strategic planning documents, fixed already in the initial version of Federal law No.172, Spatial development strategy was developed and approved in the absence of a “basic” document defining the strategic objectives of the socio-economic development of the country for the future. The actual lack of a deep scientific and public expertise of this Strategy also played a negative role. Formally, there were a lot of different discussions; one draft document was replaced by another over and over again, but the comments and suggestions received were left without due attention, and these discussions did not give a positive result. As a result, it turned out that some variants of the Strategy were discussed, and a completely different one was adopted. As a result, there were more gaps in this Strategy than significant advances. Most of these gaps are still clearly visible today and, of course, need serious elaboration.","PeriodicalId":30952,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Federalism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Problems of Spatial Development Strategization\",\"authors\":\"E. Bukhvald\",\"doi\":\"10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 for the period up to 2025 not only remains in the “field of view” of economic theorists and practitioners of public administration, but also in many ways continues to embody the complexity and inconsistency of the strategic planning system in the country. Of course, we have to admit that many of the initial assumptions of the development of this Strategy did not work out quite well. Thus, to date, it has not been possible to adopt the Concept of State Regional Policy, which has been repeatedly proposed in different versions, and on this basis to carry out a meaningful and targeted differentiation of the concepts of “regional” and “spatial” development. Contrary to the logic of the preparation of strategic planning documents, fixed already in the initial version of Federal law No.172, Spatial development strategy was developed and approved in the absence of a “basic” document defining the strategic objectives of the socio-economic development of the country for the future. The actual lack of a deep scientific and public expertise of this Strategy also played a negative role. Formally, there were a lot of different discussions; one draft document was replaced by another over and over again, but the comments and suggestions received were left without due attention, and these discussions did not give a positive result. As a result, it turned out that some variants of the Strategy were discussed, and a completely different one was adopted. As a result, there were more gaps in this Strategy than significant advances. Most of these gaps are still clearly visible today and, of course, need serious elaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Federalism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Federalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Federalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年通过的《俄罗斯联邦空间发展战略》(至2025年)不仅停留在经济理论家和公共行政实践者的“视野”中,而且在许多方面继续体现了该国战略规划体系的复杂性和不一致性。当然,我们必须承认,制定这一战略的许多最初假设并没有很好地实现。因此,到目前为止,还无法采用不同版本反复提出的国家区域政策概念,并在此基础上对“区域”和“空间”发展概念进行有意义的、有针对性的区分。与制定战略规划文件的逻辑相反,在第172号联邦法的最初版本中已经确定了空间发展战略,在没有确定国家未来社会经济发展战略目标的“基本”文件的情况下制定和批准了该战略。实际缺乏对这一战略深厚的科学和公共专业知识也起了消极作用。形式上,有很多不同的讨论;一个文件草案被另一个文件草案一次又一次地替换,但收到的意见和建议没有得到应有的重视,这些讨论没有产生积极的结果。结果,讨论了该战略的一些变体,并采用了一个完全不同的战略。因此,这项战略的差距大于重大进展。这些差距中的大多数今天仍然清晰可见,当然需要认真加以阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional Problems of Spatial Development Strategization
The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 for the period up to 2025 not only remains in the “field of view” of economic theorists and practitioners of public administration, but also in many ways continues to embody the complexity and inconsistency of the strategic planning system in the country. Of course, we have to admit that many of the initial assumptions of the development of this Strategy did not work out quite well. Thus, to date, it has not been possible to adopt the Concept of State Regional Policy, which has been repeatedly proposed in different versions, and on this basis to carry out a meaningful and targeted differentiation of the concepts of “regional” and “spatial” development. Contrary to the logic of the preparation of strategic planning documents, fixed already in the initial version of Federal law No.172, Spatial development strategy was developed and approved in the absence of a “basic” document defining the strategic objectives of the socio-economic development of the country for the future. The actual lack of a deep scientific and public expertise of this Strategy also played a negative role. Formally, there were a lot of different discussions; one draft document was replaced by another over and over again, but the comments and suggestions received were left without due attention, and these discussions did not give a positive result. As a result, it turned out that some variants of the Strategy were discussed, and a completely different one was adopted. As a result, there were more gaps in this Strategy than significant advances. Most of these gaps are still clearly visible today and, of course, need serious elaboration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Federalism is an Open Access peer-reviewed journal, promoted by the Centre for Studies on Federalism. This initiative follows the Bibliographical Bulletin on Federalism’s success, with an average of 15000 individual visits a month. Perspectives on Federalism aims at becoming a leading journal on the subject, and an open forum for interdisciplinary debate about federalism at all levels of government: sub-national, national, and supra-national at both regional and global levels. Perspectives on Federalism is divided into three sections. Along with essays and review articles, which are common to all academic journal, it will also publish very short notes to provide information and updated comments about political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level, whenever they are relevant to scholars of federalism. We hope scholars from around the world will contribute to this initiative, and we have provided a simple and immediate way to submit an essay, a review article or a note. Perspectives on Federalism will publish original contributions from different disciplinary viewpoints as the subject of federalism requires. Papers submitted will undergo a process of double blind review before eventually being accepted for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fiscal and Tax Policy Response to New Challenges and Budget Performance in the First Quarter of 2023 Implementation of Social Programs in Conditions of Increasing Labor Precarization: Regional Aspects on the Example of the USA Preferential Territories in the Spatial Development of the Russian Federation The First Quarter of 2023 for the Consolidated Budgetsof the Subjects of the Russian Federation: Emerging Trends and New Conditions Key Performance Indicators for the Implementation of Strategic Plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1