护理控制还是控制护理?联合国难民事务高级专员办事处和约旦的叙利亚难民之间的生物识别技术促进了双重约束

Q2 Social Sciences Society and Economy Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI:10.1556/204.2021.00027
Beata Paragi, A. Altamimi
{"title":"护理控制还是控制护理?联合国难民事务高级专员办事处和约旦的叙利亚难民之间的生物识别技术促进了双重约束","authors":"Beata Paragi, A. Altamimi","doi":"10.1556/204.2021.00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Biometric technologies are increasingly used by governments and international organizations in the context of refugee protection and control. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the ‘double bind’ embedded in the collection and processing of biometric data by exploring the experiences of Syrian refugees residing in Jordan. While taking biometric data is part of the UNHCR-registration, it is also used for other purposes, such as providing assistance and tracking movement. The findings are based on desk research and empirical data collected in Jordan. While stakeholders with vested interests argue for the benefits of technology, critical research is more concerned with human rights, unintended consequences of humanitarian governance or surveillance humanitarianism. Refugees, upon registration, seem to be more concerned with smooth and uninterrupted access to aid. While due to their vulnerable position they cannot really afford considering the consequences of giving their biometric data when they are asked to do so, sharing their biometric data entails a double bind situation. On the one hand, international organizations (such as the UNHCR and the WFP) in cooperation with commercial actors use iris scans as a payment method promising better food security for Syrian refugees in Jordan. On the other hand, the very same biometric data can be used for controlling, if not blocking, their free movement. The double bind logic implies that refugees registered with their biometrics can enjoy care only if they tolerate sophisticated control too.","PeriodicalId":40049,"journal":{"name":"Society and Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caring control or controlling care? Double bind facilitated by biometrics between UNHCR and Syrian refugees in Jordan\",\"authors\":\"Beata Paragi, A. Altamimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/204.2021.00027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Biometric technologies are increasingly used by governments and international organizations in the context of refugee protection and control. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the ‘double bind’ embedded in the collection and processing of biometric data by exploring the experiences of Syrian refugees residing in Jordan. While taking biometric data is part of the UNHCR-registration, it is also used for other purposes, such as providing assistance and tracking movement. The findings are based on desk research and empirical data collected in Jordan. While stakeholders with vested interests argue for the benefits of technology, critical research is more concerned with human rights, unintended consequences of humanitarian governance or surveillance humanitarianism. Refugees, upon registration, seem to be more concerned with smooth and uninterrupted access to aid. While due to their vulnerable position they cannot really afford considering the consequences of giving their biometric data when they are asked to do so, sharing their biometric data entails a double bind situation. On the one hand, international organizations (such as the UNHCR and the WFP) in cooperation with commercial actors use iris scans as a payment method promising better food security for Syrian refugees in Jordan. On the other hand, the very same biometric data can be used for controlling, if not blocking, their free movement. The double bind logic implies that refugees registered with their biometrics can enjoy care only if they tolerate sophisticated control too.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society and Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society and Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2021.00027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2021.00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

生物识别技术越来越多地被政府和国际组织用于难民保护和控制。本文的目的是通过探索居住在约旦的叙利亚难民的经历来强调嵌入在生物特征数据收集和处理中的“双重约束”。虽然获取生物特征数据是难民专员办事处登记的一部分,但它也用于其他目的,例如提供援助和跟踪行动。这些发现是基于桌面研究和在约旦收集的实证数据。虽然既得利益相关者主张技术的好处,但批判性研究更关注人权、人道主义治理的意外后果或监督人道主义。登记后的难民似乎更关心能否顺利和不间断地获得援助。虽然由于他们的弱势地位,当他们被要求提供生物特征数据时,他们无法真正考虑提供生物特征数据的后果,但分享他们的生物特征数据需要双重约束。一方面,国际组织(如联合国难民署和世界粮食计划署)与商业机构合作,使用虹膜扫描作为一种支付方式,有望为在约旦的叙利亚难民提供更好的粮食安全。另一方面,同样的生物特征数据可以用来控制他们的自由活动,如果不是阻止的话。双重约束逻辑意味着,用生物识别技术登记的难民只有在忍受复杂的控制的情况下才能享受到照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caring control or controlling care? Double bind facilitated by biometrics between UNHCR and Syrian refugees in Jordan
Biometric technologies are increasingly used by governments and international organizations in the context of refugee protection and control. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the ‘double bind’ embedded in the collection and processing of biometric data by exploring the experiences of Syrian refugees residing in Jordan. While taking biometric data is part of the UNHCR-registration, it is also used for other purposes, such as providing assistance and tracking movement. The findings are based on desk research and empirical data collected in Jordan. While stakeholders with vested interests argue for the benefits of technology, critical research is more concerned with human rights, unintended consequences of humanitarian governance or surveillance humanitarianism. Refugees, upon registration, seem to be more concerned with smooth and uninterrupted access to aid. While due to their vulnerable position they cannot really afford considering the consequences of giving their biometric data when they are asked to do so, sharing their biometric data entails a double bind situation. On the one hand, international organizations (such as the UNHCR and the WFP) in cooperation with commercial actors use iris scans as a payment method promising better food security for Syrian refugees in Jordan. On the other hand, the very same biometric data can be used for controlling, if not blocking, their free movement. The double bind logic implies that refugees registered with their biometrics can enjoy care only if they tolerate sophisticated control too.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Society and Economy
Society and Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The double-blind peer-reviewed journal publishes original research articles and book reviews in the fields of economics, social sciences, and business studies, which address social and economic issues in Central and Eastern Europe or have relevance for social and economic development in this region. While it welcomes articles from the international academic community, Society and Economy seeks in particular to provide an international forum for scholars working in the research traditions of this region. The journal welcomes submissions of high-quality and multi-disciplinary articles that address social, demographic, political, economic and industrial trends and challenges. Society and Economy is a gold open access journal since 2019 but authors are not requested to pay an article processing fee.
期刊最新文献
How can nature and nurture influence teleworkers: The influence of national culture and personal traits on job satisfaction ChatGPT from the students' point of view – Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher education Exposure and preparedness for wartime inflation in the EU: Retrospective cluster analysis Distribution and use of tax support for housing in the Czech Republic The effect of review quality on purchase intention in cross-border e-commerce: The case of Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1