全球心理健康研究中的伦理考虑:从美墨两国合作中吸取的经验教训

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI:10.1177/10443894221122509
Luis R. Torres-Hostos, R. Gearing, Pedro Isnardo de La Cruz Lugardo, B. Pérez Ramírez, K. Brewer, Maria del Rosario Silva Arciniega, Leticia Aparicio Soriano
{"title":"全球心理健康研究中的伦理考虑:从美墨两国合作中吸取的经验教训","authors":"Luis R. Torres-Hostos, R. Gearing, Pedro Isnardo de La Cruz Lugardo, B. Pérez Ramírez, K. Brewer, Maria del Rosario Silva Arciniega, Leticia Aparicio Soriano","doi":"10.1177/10443894221122509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Binational research is critical to better understand the health, mental health, and health outcomes of immigrant communities. Binational studies are often difficult to conduct, however, due to cost, challenges with participant recruitment and data collection, lack of appropriate cross-cultural instruments, and challenges ensuring ethical reviews and approval in both counties. This research note discusses ethical issues navigating institutional review board (IRB) procedures while striving to maintain the highest ethical protection for participants when engaging in binational behavioral sciences research between México and the United States. We discuss the need to clarify requirements for international research between México and the United States and navigating differences that may exist or emerge between IRBs in México and the United States. We provide some recommendations to assist researchers in ensuring IRB approval for their research protocols and ethical protection for their participants.","PeriodicalId":47463,"journal":{"name":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","volume":"8 1","pages":"86 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Considerations in Global Mental Health Research: Lessons Learned From Binational U.S.–Mexico Collaborations\",\"authors\":\"Luis R. Torres-Hostos, R. Gearing, Pedro Isnardo de La Cruz Lugardo, B. Pérez Ramírez, K. Brewer, Maria del Rosario Silva Arciniega, Leticia Aparicio Soriano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10443894221122509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Binational research is critical to better understand the health, mental health, and health outcomes of immigrant communities. Binational studies are often difficult to conduct, however, due to cost, challenges with participant recruitment and data collection, lack of appropriate cross-cultural instruments, and challenges ensuring ethical reviews and approval in both counties. This research note discusses ethical issues navigating institutional review board (IRB) procedures while striving to maintain the highest ethical protection for participants when engaging in binational behavioral sciences research between México and the United States. We discuss the need to clarify requirements for international research between México and the United States and navigating differences that may exist or emerge between IRBs in México and the United States. We provide some recommendations to assist researchers in ensuring IRB approval for their research protocols and ethical protection for their participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"86 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894221122509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894221122509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两国研究对于更好地了解移民社区的健康、心理健康和健康结果至关重要。然而,由于成本、参与者招募和数据收集方面的挑战、缺乏适当的跨文化工具以及确保两国的伦理审查和批准方面的挑战,两国研究通常难以进行。本研究报告讨论了指导机构审查委员会(IRB)程序的伦理问题,同时努力为在墨西哥和美国之间从事两国行为科学研究的参与者保持最高的伦理保护。我们讨论了澄清msamxico和美国之间国际研究需求的必要性,以及在msamxico和美国的irb之间可能存在或出现的差异。我们提供了一些建议,以帮助研究人员确保IRB批准他们的研究方案,并为他们的参与者提供道德保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical Considerations in Global Mental Health Research: Lessons Learned From Binational U.S.–Mexico Collaborations
Binational research is critical to better understand the health, mental health, and health outcomes of immigrant communities. Binational studies are often difficult to conduct, however, due to cost, challenges with participant recruitment and data collection, lack of appropriate cross-cultural instruments, and challenges ensuring ethical reviews and approval in both counties. This research note discusses ethical issues navigating institutional review board (IRB) procedures while striving to maintain the highest ethical protection for participants when engaging in binational behavioral sciences research between México and the United States. We discuss the need to clarify requirements for international research between México and the United States and navigating differences that may exist or emerge between IRBs in México and the United States. We provide some recommendations to assist researchers in ensuring IRB approval for their research protocols and ethical protection for their participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Experiences and Service Utilization of American Indian/Alaskan Native Kinship Caregivers in Kinship Navigator Programs Across Washington State Initial Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of New Survey Measures to Evaluate Family Outcomes of Kinship and Adoption Navigator Programs Preventive Legal Services for Kinship Care: Reducing the Need for Foster Care with Family First Conceptualizations of Permanency in an Online Foster Care Community The Experiences of Asian Americans Who Intermarry in the United States: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1