关于非典型抗酸菌群IV Rapid Growers的研究

H. Saito, H. Tasaka, N. Takei
{"title":"关于非典型抗酸菌群IV Rapid Growers的研究","authors":"H. Saito, H. Tasaka, N. Takei","doi":"10.3412/JSB.23.758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A collection of nonphotochromogenic, rapidly growing, acid-fast bacilli isolated from nature was analyzed on the basis of the Adansonian classification proposed by Sneath (1957).Of ninety-one strains used, seventy-eight (86 per cent) were classified as M. fortuitum. Of these, fifty-nine of sixty-six strains studied selectively (89 per cent) were isolates: sixteen of twenty-one (76 per cent) were sewage isolates; one of one was river water isolate; two of three were sea water isolates. Most of these fresh isolates were identified as M. fortuitum. Their biological and biochemical characteristics were compatible with those of the disease-associated strains. Only two strains were recognized to beof M. smegmatis. Eleven of the remaining strains could not be classified by the methods used. No strains of M. abscessus were observed. This result suggests that this organism may hardly or not existin nature.M. runyonii (Bojalil et al., 1962) has been listed as a synonym of M. abscessus (Moore et al., 1953). The name M. abscessus is valid, since it has priority.There was a close relationship between M. abscessus and M. borstelense.","PeriodicalId":14812,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of bacteriology","volume":"21 1","pages":"387-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1968-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"非定型抗酸菌Group IV Rapid Growersに関する研究\",\"authors\":\"H. Saito, H. Tasaka, N. Takei\",\"doi\":\"10.3412/JSB.23.758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A collection of nonphotochromogenic, rapidly growing, acid-fast bacilli isolated from nature was analyzed on the basis of the Adansonian classification proposed by Sneath (1957).Of ninety-one strains used, seventy-eight (86 per cent) were classified as M. fortuitum. Of these, fifty-nine of sixty-six strains studied selectively (89 per cent) were isolates: sixteen of twenty-one (76 per cent) were sewage isolates; one of one was river water isolate; two of three were sea water isolates. Most of these fresh isolates were identified as M. fortuitum. Their biological and biochemical characteristics were compatible with those of the disease-associated strains. Only two strains were recognized to beof M. smegmatis. Eleven of the remaining strains could not be classified by the methods used. No strains of M. abscessus were observed. This result suggests that this organism may hardly or not existin nature.M. runyonii (Bojalil et al., 1962) has been listed as a synonym of M. abscessus (Moore et al., 1953). The name M. abscessus is valid, since it has priority.There was a close relationship between M. abscessus and M. borstelense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of bacteriology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"387-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1968-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of bacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3412/JSB.23.758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3412/JSB.23.758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

根据Sneath(1957)提出的adanonian分类,对从自然界分离的非光显性、快速生长的抗酸杆菌进行了分析。在所使用的91个菌株中,78个(86%)被归类为福氏分枝杆菌。其中,选择性研究的66种菌株中有59种(89%)是分离株;21种菌株中有16种(76%)是污水分离株;其中一个是孤立的河水;其中两个是与海水隔绝的。这些新鲜分离株多数被鉴定为福氏分枝杆菌。它们的生物学和生化特性与疾病相关菌株一致。只有两株被确认为耻毛分枝杆菌。剩下的菌株中有11个无法通过所使用的方法进行分类。未观察到脓肿分枝杆菌。这一结果表明,这种有机体可能几乎不存在,也可能根本不存在。runyonii (Bojalil et al., 1962)被列为M.脓肿的同义词(Moore et al., 1953)。脓肿分枝杆菌这个名字是有效的,因为它具有优先权。脓肿支原体与竹支原体亲缘关系密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非定型抗酸菌Group IV Rapid Growersに関する研究
A collection of nonphotochromogenic, rapidly growing, acid-fast bacilli isolated from nature was analyzed on the basis of the Adansonian classification proposed by Sneath (1957).Of ninety-one strains used, seventy-eight (86 per cent) were classified as M. fortuitum. Of these, fifty-nine of sixty-six strains studied selectively (89 per cent) were isolates: sixteen of twenty-one (76 per cent) were sewage isolates; one of one was river water isolate; two of three were sea water isolates. Most of these fresh isolates were identified as M. fortuitum. Their biological and biochemical characteristics were compatible with those of the disease-associated strains. Only two strains were recognized to beof M. smegmatis. Eleven of the remaining strains could not be classified by the methods used. No strains of M. abscessus were observed. This result suggests that this organism may hardly or not existin nature.M. runyonii (Bojalil et al., 1962) has been listed as a synonym of M. abscessus (Moore et al., 1953). The name M. abscessus is valid, since it has priority.There was a close relationship between M. abscessus and M. borstelense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In memoriam of Dr. Yoshiro Terawaki Typings of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from patients of 2 outbreak cases by genotypic and phenotypic methods ベロ毒素産生 Escherichia coli O157:H7に対する Bicozamycin の抗菌作用 内毒素の活性中心(リピドA)の研究 Campylobacter infection in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1