{"title":"EM分析,经典的还是新颖的","authors":"W. Leahy","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Once the classic approaches relating field theory to EM propagation and attenuation are examined in contrast to the newer approaches (nouvelle approaches) using circuit theory, two questions emerge. First, we must ask, “who’s right?” Second, “who cares?” This paper addresses these two questions and their ramifications to the EM engineer and the EM field.","PeriodicalId":93568,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"25 1","pages":"27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EM analysis, classic or nouvelle\",\"authors\":\"W. Leahy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Once the classic approaches relating field theory to EM propagation and attenuation are examined in contrast to the newer approaches (nouvelle approaches) using circuit theory, two questions emerge. First, we must ask, “who’s right?” Second, “who cares?” This paper addresses these two questions and their ramifications to the EM engineer and the EM field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"27-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一旦将场论与电磁传播和衰减相关的经典方法与使用电路理论的新方法(nouvelle方法)进行对比,就会出现两个问题。首先,我们必须问:“谁是对的?”第二,“谁在乎呢?”本文讨论了这两个问题及其对电磁工程师和电磁领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EM analysis, classic or nouvelle
Once the classic approaches relating field theory to EM propagation and attenuation are examined in contrast to the newer approaches (nouvelle approaches) using circuit theory, two questions emerge. First, we must ask, “who’s right?” Second, “who cares?” This paper addresses these two questions and their ramifications to the EM engineer and the EM field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reverberating Asymmetric TEM Cell For Radiated EMC/V And SE Testing, 10 KHz-18 GHz Modelling Electromagnetic Radiation From Digital Electronic Systems By Means Of The Finite Difference Time Domain Method Applying The Waveguide Below Cut-off Principle To Shielded Enclosure Design Lightning Transient Response And Margin Analysis Of Aircraft Circuits Ualification Of Radiated EMI Test Sites Using Statistical Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1