硼替佐米治疗慢性主动抗体介导的排斥反应:单中心经验

Xue Li, Jinsong Chen, D. Cheng, K. Xie, X. Ni, J. Wen
{"title":"硼替佐米治疗慢性主动抗体介导的排斥反应:单中心经验","authors":"Xue Li, Jinsong Chen, D. Cheng, K. Xie, X. Ni, J. Wen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in kidney transplant recipients with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR). \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective study wad conducted in patients(n=136)fulfilling the Banff 2017 criteria for cABMR from January 2004 to July 2017, including 29 patients bortezomib group and 97 patients in control group. Identified cABMR patients were dichotomized into bortezomib and control groups with a 1∶1 match using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome was initiation of replacement therapy or an estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)declined to <15 ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1. The prognosis and adverse reactions of two groups were analyzed and evaluated. \n \n \nResults \nNo significant inter-group differences existed in age, sex ratio, immunosuppressive regimen, allograft age, serum creatinine, eGFR, urine protein, serum albumin, hemoglobin or HCV positive rate(all P>0.05). There were no significant inter-group differences in Banff scores (g, i, t, v, ah, mm, ci, ct, cv, ptc, c4d, all P>0.05). The median survival for bortezomib group and control group was 40.7 months and 36.9 months respectively. No statistically significant difference in graft survival between the two groups was observed(P=0.83), even after propensity score adjustment(P=0.29). The incidence of nausea, diarrhea and thrombocytopenia in bortezomib group was higher than those in control group (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nBortezomib does not seem to improve the prognosis of cABMR while is associated with higher incidence of adverse reactions. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney transplantation; Graft rejection; Prognosis; Adverse reaction","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"159 1","pages":"539-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bortezomib in chronic active antibody-mediated rejection: a single center experience\",\"authors\":\"Xue Li, Jinsong Chen, D. Cheng, K. Xie, X. Ni, J. Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in kidney transplant recipients with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA retrospective study wad conducted in patients(n=136)fulfilling the Banff 2017 criteria for cABMR from January 2004 to July 2017, including 29 patients bortezomib group and 97 patients in control group. Identified cABMR patients were dichotomized into bortezomib and control groups with a 1∶1 match using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome was initiation of replacement therapy or an estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)declined to <15 ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1. The prognosis and adverse reactions of two groups were analyzed and evaluated. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nNo significant inter-group differences existed in age, sex ratio, immunosuppressive regimen, allograft age, serum creatinine, eGFR, urine protein, serum albumin, hemoglobin or HCV positive rate(all P>0.05). There were no significant inter-group differences in Banff scores (g, i, t, v, ah, mm, ci, ct, cv, ptc, c4d, all P>0.05). The median survival for bortezomib group and control group was 40.7 months and 36.9 months respectively. No statistically significant difference in graft survival between the two groups was observed(P=0.83), even after propensity score adjustment(P=0.29). The incidence of nausea, diarrhea and thrombocytopenia in bortezomib group was higher than those in control group (P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nBortezomib does not seem to improve the prognosis of cABMR while is associated with higher incidence of adverse reactions. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nKidney transplantation; Graft rejection; Prognosis; Adverse reaction\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"539-544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价硼替佐米治疗肾移植受者慢性活动性抗体介导排斥反应(cABMR)的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性研究2004年1月至2017年7月符合Banff 2017标准的cABMR患者136例,其中硼替佐米组29例,对照组97例。采用倾向评分匹配法将确诊的cABMR患者分为硼替佐米组和对照组,并按1∶1匹配。主要结局是开始替代治疗或估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降到0.05)。组间Banff评分差异无统计学意义(g、i、t、v、ah、mm、ci、ct、cv、ptc、c4d,均P>0.05)。硼替佐米组和对照组的中位生存期分别为40.7个月和36.9个月。两组间移植物存活率差异无统计学意义(P=0.83),即使在倾向评分调整后(P=0.29)。硼替佐米组恶心、腹泻、血小板减少发生率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论硼替佐米似乎不能改善cABMR的预后,但与较高的不良反应发生率相关。关键词:肾移植;移植排斥;预后;不良反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bortezomib in chronic active antibody-mediated rejection: a single center experience
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in kidney transplant recipients with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR). Methods A retrospective study wad conducted in patients(n=136)fulfilling the Banff 2017 criteria for cABMR from January 2004 to July 2017, including 29 patients bortezomib group and 97 patients in control group. Identified cABMR patients were dichotomized into bortezomib and control groups with a 1∶1 match using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome was initiation of replacement therapy or an estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)declined to <15 ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1. The prognosis and adverse reactions of two groups were analyzed and evaluated. Results No significant inter-group differences existed in age, sex ratio, immunosuppressive regimen, allograft age, serum creatinine, eGFR, urine protein, serum albumin, hemoglobin or HCV positive rate(all P>0.05). There were no significant inter-group differences in Banff scores (g, i, t, v, ah, mm, ci, ct, cv, ptc, c4d, all P>0.05). The median survival for bortezomib group and control group was 40.7 months and 36.9 months respectively. No statistically significant difference in graft survival between the two groups was observed(P=0.83), even after propensity score adjustment(P=0.29). The incidence of nausea, diarrhea and thrombocytopenia in bortezomib group was higher than those in control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Bortezomib does not seem to improve the prognosis of cABMR while is associated with higher incidence of adverse reactions. Key words: Kidney transplantation; Graft rejection; Prognosis; Adverse reaction
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasonography to Biopsy, in Evaluation of Post-transplant Complications and Kidney Function Overview of global organ donation and transplantation in 2020 Development and prospect of clinical research on lung transplantation in post-COVID-19 era. Risk assessment of organ donation and procurement during COVID-19 epidemic Clinical analysis of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on one case with living-related kidney transplantation/ 中华器官移植杂志
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1