信息图信息传递差异的眼动追踪研究

Barbara Ströhl, Kilian Ganz, Stephanie Richter, Kilian Zieglmeier, Rainer Hammwöhner
{"title":"信息图信息传递差异的眼动追踪研究","authors":"Barbara Ströhl, Kilian Ganz, Stephanie Richter, Kilian Zieglmeier, Rainer Hammwöhner","doi":"10.18452/1458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information graphics are commonly used to display information. Nevertheless, the retention of information can differ depending on the presentation of the content. A topic that is currently present to all of us in the media is the refugee influx to Europe. As it caused a lot of chaos, confusion and anxiety, the transfer of information played and still plays a crucial role, which is why we chose two different graphics visualizing facts and information about refugees. Our aims were to get insights into the readers’ information behavior dealing with information graphics and to find differences in information transfer. Therefore, we conducted eye-tracking experiments and analyzed the fixation time and the fixation count on both textual and non-textual elements of the infographics. After reading, the retention of information was tested using free text questions and summed up in a score that was evaluated. Results showed that the subjects had spent most of their time on textual elements for each infographic. The viewing behavior did not differ significantly between the two graphics. Despite this, we found significant differences in information transfer. This might be because one infographic had fewer subtopics. Each of these subtopics was backed up by the repetition of several textual and non-textual elements as well as additional details, which broadened the context.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"51 1","pages":"50-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Eye-Tracking Study on Differences in Information Transfer by Infographics\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Ströhl, Kilian Ganz, Stephanie Richter, Kilian Zieglmeier, Rainer Hammwöhner\",\"doi\":\"10.18452/1458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information graphics are commonly used to display information. Nevertheless, the retention of information can differ depending on the presentation of the content. A topic that is currently present to all of us in the media is the refugee influx to Europe. As it caused a lot of chaos, confusion and anxiety, the transfer of information played and still plays a crucial role, which is why we chose two different graphics visualizing facts and information about refugees. Our aims were to get insights into the readers’ information behavior dealing with information graphics and to find differences in information transfer. Therefore, we conducted eye-tracking experiments and analyzed the fixation time and the fixation count on both textual and non-textual elements of the infographics. After reading, the retention of information was tested using free text questions and summed up in a score that was evaluated. Results showed that the subjects had spent most of their time on textual elements for each infographic. The viewing behavior did not differ significantly between the two graphics. Despite this, we found significant differences in information transfer. This might be because one infographic had fewer subtopics. Each of these subtopics was backed up by the repetition of several textual and non-textual elements as well as additional details, which broadened the context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"50-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18452/1458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18452/1458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

信息图形通常用于显示信息。然而,信息的保留可能因内容的表示而有所不同。目前我们大家在媒体上看到的一个话题是难民涌入欧洲。由于它造成了很多混乱、困惑和焦虑,信息的传递在过去和现在都起着至关重要的作用,这就是为什么我们选择了两种不同的图形来可视化难民的事实和信息。我们的目的是了解读者处理信息图形的信息行为,发现信息传递的差异。因此,我们进行了眼动实验,分析了信息图表文本和非文本元素的注视时间和注视次数。阅读后,使用自由文本问题测试信息的保留情况,并将其总结成一个分数进行评估。结果显示,受试者将大部分时间花在每个信息图的文本元素上。观看行为在两个图形之间没有显着差异。尽管如此,我们还是发现了信息传递方面的显著差异。这可能是因为一个信息图的子主题较少。每一个小主题都有一些文本和非文本元素的重复,以及额外的细节,这扩大了上下文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Eye-Tracking Study on Differences in Information Transfer by Infographics
Information graphics are commonly used to display information. Nevertheless, the retention of information can differ depending on the presentation of the content. A topic that is currently present to all of us in the media is the refugee influx to Europe. As it caused a lot of chaos, confusion and anxiety, the transfer of information played and still plays a crucial role, which is why we chose two different graphics visualizing facts and information about refugees. Our aims were to get insights into the readers’ information behavior dealing with information graphics and to find differences in information transfer. Therefore, we conducted eye-tracking experiments and analyzed the fixation time and the fixation count on both textual and non-textual elements of the infographics. After reading, the retention of information was tested using free text questions and summed up in a score that was evaluated. Results showed that the subjects had spent most of their time on textual elements for each infographic. The viewing behavior did not differ significantly between the two graphics. Despite this, we found significant differences in information transfer. This might be because one infographic had fewer subtopics. Each of these subtopics was backed up by the repetition of several textual and non-textual elements as well as additional details, which broadened the context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Practices of Early Career Researchers: A Qualitative Study on Research and Teaching Behavior Design and Development of an Emoji Sentiment Lexicon Does the General Public Share Research on Twitter? A Case Study on the Online Conversation about the Search for a Nuclear Repository in Germany Vom Datenkatalog zum Wissensgraph - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR Omission of Information: Identifying Political Slant via an Analysis of Co-occurring Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1