经验有效性框架在加拿大公共部门的应用

Jo'Anne Langham, Neil Paulsen
{"title":"经验有效性框架在加拿大公共部门的应用","authors":"Jo'Anne Langham,&nbsp;Neil Paulsen","doi":"10.1111/dmj.12042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Why is it so hard to interact with government services? The public sector has become citizen centered in designing and collaborating with the community to improve service. Even though governments invest in efforts to ensure public administration is aligned with the needs of the community, services still fail to meet the standards provided by equivalent private-sector organizations. Citizen experiences fall short of expectations due to inadequate performance evaluation for the delivery of integrated and well-designed services. Public-sector performance measures must assess and include the impact that services have on citizens. This article describes the extension and further development of the Experience Effectiveness (XE) Measurement Framework. If properly utilized, public-sector organizations can implement the framework to evaluate the effectiveness of citizen experiences based on human-centered, universal, and systems-thinking heuristics. Through a multiphase mixed-method design, we test the XE Framework and its operational development with two projects in the Innovation Lab for the Canadian Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. The case studies demonstrate that the XE Framework clearly differentiates the quality of the experience and identifies areas for improvement. Results also indicate that the bureaucracy distorted the creation and delivery of the service citizens received. Organizational culture, climate, structures, and values significantly shape the outcome and provision of government services, which raises further questions about design and innovation in public administration and the role of accountability.</p>","PeriodicalId":100367,"journal":{"name":"Design Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/dmj.12042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the Experience Effectiveness (XE) Framework in the Canadian Public Sector\",\"authors\":\"Jo'Anne Langham,&nbsp;Neil Paulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmj.12042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Why is it so hard to interact with government services? The public sector has become citizen centered in designing and collaborating with the community to improve service. Even though governments invest in efforts to ensure public administration is aligned with the needs of the community, services still fail to meet the standards provided by equivalent private-sector organizations. Citizen experiences fall short of expectations due to inadequate performance evaluation for the delivery of integrated and well-designed services. Public-sector performance measures must assess and include the impact that services have on citizens. This article describes the extension and further development of the Experience Effectiveness (XE) Measurement Framework. If properly utilized, public-sector organizations can implement the framework to evaluate the effectiveness of citizen experiences based on human-centered, universal, and systems-thinking heuristics. Through a multiphase mixed-method design, we test the XE Framework and its operational development with two projects in the Innovation Lab for the Canadian Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. The case studies demonstrate that the XE Framework clearly differentiates the quality of the experience and identifies areas for improvement. Results also indicate that the bureaucracy distorted the creation and delivery of the service citizens received. Organizational culture, climate, structures, and values significantly shape the outcome and provision of government services, which raises further questions about design and innovation in public administration and the role of accountability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/dmj.12042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么与政府服务互动如此困难?公共部门在设计和与社区合作以改善服务方面变得以公民为中心。尽管政府投资努力确保公共行政符合社区的需要,但服务仍然达不到同等私营部门组织提供的标准。由于对提供综合和精心设计的服务的绩效评估不足,公民体验达不到预期。公共部门绩效措施必须评估和包括服务对公民的影响。本文描述了经验有效性(XE)度量框架的扩展和进一步发展。如果使用得当,公共部门组织可以实施基于以人为本、普遍和系统思维启发式的公民体验有效性评估框架。通过多阶段混合方法设计,我们在加拿大创新、科学和经济发展部创新实验室的两个项目中测试了XE框架及其运营发展。案例研究表明,XE框架清楚地区分了体验的质量,并确定了需要改进的领域。结果还表明,官僚主义扭曲了公民获得的服务的创造和提供。组织文化、气候、结构和价值观在很大程度上决定了政府服务的结果和提供,这进一步提出了有关公共管理设计和创新以及问责制作用的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying the Experience Effectiveness (XE) Framework in the Canadian Public Sector

Why is it so hard to interact with government services? The public sector has become citizen centered in designing and collaborating with the community to improve service. Even though governments invest in efforts to ensure public administration is aligned with the needs of the community, services still fail to meet the standards provided by equivalent private-sector organizations. Citizen experiences fall short of expectations due to inadequate performance evaluation for the delivery of integrated and well-designed services. Public-sector performance measures must assess and include the impact that services have on citizens. This article describes the extension and further development of the Experience Effectiveness (XE) Measurement Framework. If properly utilized, public-sector organizations can implement the framework to evaluate the effectiveness of citizen experiences based on human-centered, universal, and systems-thinking heuristics. Through a multiphase mixed-method design, we test the XE Framework and its operational development with two projects in the Innovation Lab for the Canadian Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. The case studies demonstrate that the XE Framework clearly differentiates the quality of the experience and identifies areas for improvement. Results also indicate that the bureaucracy distorted the creation and delivery of the service citizens received. Organizational culture, climate, structures, and values significantly shape the outcome and provision of government services, which raises further questions about design and innovation in public administration and the role of accountability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Design Thinking and AI: A New Frontier for Designing Human-Centered AI Solutions From the President Designing Systems in a Fine-Grained and Inclusive Way, by Integrating Service Design within Futures Studies and Foresight Using Theory of Change to Support Participatory Visual Mapping in Urban Transformation Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1