比较带通FIR滤波器设计中不同窗函数的雷达接收机脉冲去交错性能

Cesar Martinez Melgoza, Henry Lin, Illianna Izabal, Ameya Govalkar, Kayla Lee, Alex Erdogan, K. George
{"title":"比较带通FIR滤波器设计中不同窗函数的雷达接收机脉冲去交错性能","authors":"Cesar Martinez Melgoza, Henry Lin, Illianna Izabal, Ameya Govalkar, Kayla Lee, Alex Erdogan, K. George","doi":"10.1109/IEMCON51383.2020.9284927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A radar receiver is designed to identify and process the desired echo from the radar transmission. Therefore, filter implementation is a key part of designing a receiver. This paper focuses on the performance of the Bartlett, Blackman-Harris, Chebyshev, Hamming, and Kaiser windows, which were analyzed by implementing each into a deinterleaving algorithm. Deinterleaving pulses are important because receivers often have signals interleaved with an abundance of noise. By using windows, it can reduce the abundance of noise and increase the performance of deinterleaving algorithms. The separation of the radar pulse trains from the pulse stream provides sufficient information to categorize and describe different signals with pulse descriptor words (PDW), such as Time Of Arrival (TOA), Time Of Departure (TOD), Pulse Width (PW), Pulse Repetition Interval (PRI), etc. This study presents the comparison of the five windowing techniques, the application of Hilbert transforms and envelope detection to analyze how each affects the deinterleaving algorithm. Each technique was analyzed by calculating their Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and the amount of information lost by measuring the error margin. From the data observed, the Blackman-Harris had the highest SNR, and the Kaiser window had the lowest percent error. The following sections will demonstrate the performance of each windowing technique.","PeriodicalId":6871,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","volume":"98 1","pages":"0505-0510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Radar Receiver Pulse Deinterleaving Performance of Differing Window Functions for Bandpass FIR Filter Design\",\"authors\":\"Cesar Martinez Melgoza, Henry Lin, Illianna Izabal, Ameya Govalkar, Kayla Lee, Alex Erdogan, K. George\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMCON51383.2020.9284927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A radar receiver is designed to identify and process the desired echo from the radar transmission. Therefore, filter implementation is a key part of designing a receiver. This paper focuses on the performance of the Bartlett, Blackman-Harris, Chebyshev, Hamming, and Kaiser windows, which were analyzed by implementing each into a deinterleaving algorithm. Deinterleaving pulses are important because receivers often have signals interleaved with an abundance of noise. By using windows, it can reduce the abundance of noise and increase the performance of deinterleaving algorithms. The separation of the radar pulse trains from the pulse stream provides sufficient information to categorize and describe different signals with pulse descriptor words (PDW), such as Time Of Arrival (TOA), Time Of Departure (TOD), Pulse Width (PW), Pulse Repetition Interval (PRI), etc. This study presents the comparison of the five windowing techniques, the application of Hilbert transforms and envelope detection to analyze how each affects the deinterleaving algorithm. Each technique was analyzed by calculating their Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and the amount of information lost by measuring the error margin. From the data observed, the Blackman-Harris had the highest SNR, and the Kaiser window had the lowest percent error. The following sections will demonstrate the performance of each windowing technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 11th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0505-0510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 11th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON51383.2020.9284927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON51383.2020.9284927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

雷达接收机被设计用于识别和处理从雷达传输的期望回波。因此,滤波器的实现是接收机设计的关键部分。本文重点研究了Bartlett、Blackman-Harris、Chebyshev、Hamming和Kaiser窗口的性能,并通过将它们实现到一个去交错算法中来分析它们。去交错脉冲很重要,因为接收器的信号经常与大量的噪声交织在一起。利用窗口可以减少噪声的丰度,提高去交错算法的性能。雷达脉冲序列与脉冲流的分离提供了足够的信息,可以用脉冲描述词(PDW)对不同的信号进行分类和描述,如到达时间(TOA)、离开时间(TOD)、脉冲宽度(PW)、脉冲重复间隔(PRI)等。本研究比较了五种加窗技术、希尔伯特变换和包络检测的应用,分析了每种加窗技术对去交错算法的影响。通过计算每种技术的信噪比(SNR)和测量误差范围来分析每种技术的信息丢失量。从观察到的数据来看,Blackman-Harris窗口的信噪比最高,而Kaiser窗口的误差率最低。下面几节将演示每种窗口技术的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Radar Receiver Pulse Deinterleaving Performance of Differing Window Functions for Bandpass FIR Filter Design
A radar receiver is designed to identify and process the desired echo from the radar transmission. Therefore, filter implementation is a key part of designing a receiver. This paper focuses on the performance of the Bartlett, Blackman-Harris, Chebyshev, Hamming, and Kaiser windows, which were analyzed by implementing each into a deinterleaving algorithm. Deinterleaving pulses are important because receivers often have signals interleaved with an abundance of noise. By using windows, it can reduce the abundance of noise and increase the performance of deinterleaving algorithms. The separation of the radar pulse trains from the pulse stream provides sufficient information to categorize and describe different signals with pulse descriptor words (PDW), such as Time Of Arrival (TOA), Time Of Departure (TOD), Pulse Width (PW), Pulse Repetition Interval (PRI), etc. This study presents the comparison of the five windowing techniques, the application of Hilbert transforms and envelope detection to analyze how each affects the deinterleaving algorithm. Each technique was analyzed by calculating their Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and the amount of information lost by measuring the error margin. From the data observed, the Blackman-Harris had the highest SNR, and the Kaiser window had the lowest percent error. The following sections will demonstrate the performance of each windowing technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial Time Series Stock Price Prediction using Deep Learning Development of a Low-cost LoRa based SCADA system for Monitoring and Supervisory Control of Small Renewable Energy Generation Systems A Systematic Literature Review in Causal Association Rules Mining Distance-Based Anomaly Detection for Industrial Surfaces Using Triplet Networks Analysis of Requirements for Autonomous Driving Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1