{"title":"宗教受到审判","authors":"R. Evans","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter highlights the social actors who have perhaps the most outsized influence on religious classification in the modern United States: judges. In 1981, MOVE’s claims to religious legitimacy received their day in court. A MOVE person, Frank Africa, who was then incarcerated in a Pennsylvania state prison, requested from the prison a religious accommodation for his MOVE diet. The prison denied his request, and Frank appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Before the court could decide on Frank’s request, the judges had to first determine whether or not MOVE was a religion.","PeriodicalId":91936,"journal":{"name":"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religion on Trial\",\"authors\":\"R. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter highlights the social actors who have perhaps the most outsized influence on religious classification in the modern United States: judges. In 1981, MOVE’s claims to religious legitimacy received their day in court. A MOVE person, Frank Africa, who was then incarcerated in a Pennsylvania state prison, requested from the prison a religious accommodation for his MOVE diet. The prison denied his request, and Frank appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Before the court could decide on Frank’s request, the judges had to first determine whether or not MOVE was a religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章重点介绍了对现代美国宗教分类影响最大的社会行动者:法官。1981年,MOVE的宗教合法性诉求在法庭上得到了伸张。一个叫Frank Africa的MOVE成员,当时被关押在宾夕法尼亚州的州立监狱,他要求监狱为他的MOVE饮食提供宗教住宿。监狱拒绝了他的请求,弗兰克向第三巡回上诉法院上诉。在法院对弗兰克的请求作出裁决之前,法官们必须首先确定MOVE是否是一种宗教。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Religion on Trial
This chapter highlights the social actors who have perhaps the most outsized influence on religious classification in the modern United States: judges. In 1981, MOVE’s claims to religious legitimacy received their day in court. A MOVE person, Frank Africa, who was then incarcerated in a Pennsylvania state prison, requested from the prison a religious accommodation for his MOVE diet. The prison denied his request, and Frank appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Before the court could decide on Frank’s request, the judges had to first determine whether or not MOVE was a religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Religion on Trial Progress Conversions Policing Religion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1