利用COPD问卷中呼吸道症状评价来表征COPD稳定状态下的症状变异性

J. Krishnan, Kayley M Ancy, C. Oromendia, K. Hoffman, I. Easthausen, N. Leidy, M. Han, R. Bowler, S. Christenson, D. Couper, G. Criner, J. Curtis, M. Dransfield, N. Hansel, A. Iyer, R. Paine Iii, S. Peters, J. Wedzicha, P. Woodruff, K. Ballman, F. Martinez
{"title":"利用COPD问卷中呼吸道症状评价来表征COPD稳定状态下的症状变异性","authors":"J. Krishnan, Kayley M Ancy, C. Oromendia, K. Hoffman, I. Easthausen, N. Leidy, M. Han, R. Bowler, S. Christenson, D. Couper, G. Criner, J. Curtis, M. Dransfield, N. Hansel, A. Iyer, R. Paine Iii, S. Peters, J. Wedzicha, P. Woodruff, K. Ballman, F. Martinez","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale\nIt has been suggested that patients with COPD experience considerable daily respiratory symptom fluctuation. A standardized measure is needed to quantify and understand the implications of day-to-day symptom variability.\n\n\nObjectives\nTo compare standard deviation with other statistical measures of symptom variability and identify characteristics of subjects with higher symptom variability.\n\n\nMethods\nIndividuals in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) Exacerbations sub-study completed an Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) daily questionnaire. We calculated within-subject standard deviation (WS-SD) for each patient at week 0 and correlated this with measurements obtained four weeks later using Pearson's r and Bland Altman plots. Median WS-SD value dichotomized participants into higher versus lower variability groups. Association between WS-SD and exacerbation risk during four follow up weeks was explored.\n\n\nMeasurements and Main Results\nDiary completion rates were sufficient in 140 (68%) of 205 sub-study participants. Reproducibility (r) of the WS-SD metric from baseline to week four was 0.32. Higher variability participants had higher St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (47.3 ± 20.3 vs 39.6 ± 21.5, p=.04) than lower variability participants. Exploratory analyses found no relationship between symptom variability and HCRU exacerbations.\n\n\nConclusions\nWS-SD of the E-RS can be used as a measure of symptom variability in studies of patients with COPD. Patients with higher variability have worse health-related quality of life. WS-SD should be further validated as a measure to understand the implications of symptom variability.","PeriodicalId":10249,"journal":{"name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing COPD Symptom Variability in the Stable State Utilizing the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"J. Krishnan, Kayley M Ancy, C. Oromendia, K. Hoffman, I. Easthausen, N. Leidy, M. Han, R. Bowler, S. Christenson, D. Couper, G. Criner, J. Curtis, M. Dransfield, N. Hansel, A. Iyer, R. Paine Iii, S. Peters, J. Wedzicha, P. Woodruff, K. Ballman, F. Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale\\nIt has been suggested that patients with COPD experience considerable daily respiratory symptom fluctuation. A standardized measure is needed to quantify and understand the implications of day-to-day symptom variability.\\n\\n\\nObjectives\\nTo compare standard deviation with other statistical measures of symptom variability and identify characteristics of subjects with higher symptom variability.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nIndividuals in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) Exacerbations sub-study completed an Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) daily questionnaire. We calculated within-subject standard deviation (WS-SD) for each patient at week 0 and correlated this with measurements obtained four weeks later using Pearson's r and Bland Altman plots. Median WS-SD value dichotomized participants into higher versus lower variability groups. Association between WS-SD and exacerbation risk during four follow up weeks was explored.\\n\\n\\nMeasurements and Main Results\\nDiary completion rates were sufficient in 140 (68%) of 205 sub-study participants. Reproducibility (r) of the WS-SD metric from baseline to week four was 0.32. Higher variability participants had higher St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (47.3 ± 20.3 vs 39.6 ± 21.5, p=.04) than lower variability participants. Exploratory analyses found no relationship between symptom variability and HCRU exacerbations.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nWS-SD of the E-RS can be used as a measure of symptom variability in studies of patients with COPD. Patients with higher variability have worse health-related quality of life. WS-SD should be further validated as a measure to understand the implications of symptom variability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有研究表明,慢性阻塞性肺病患者每日呼吸症状波动较大。需要一种标准化的措施来量化和理解日常症状变异性的含义。目的比较症状变异性的标准差与其他统计方法的差异,确定症状变异性较高的被试的特征。方法慢性阻塞性肺病研究(SPIROMICS)加重亚研究的亚群个体和中间结局指标完成了COPD呼吸症状评估(E-RS)每日问卷调查。我们计算了每个患者在第0周的受试者内标准差(WS-SD),并使用Pearson's r和Bland Altman图将其与四周后获得的测量结果相关联。WS-SD值中位数将参与者分为高变异性组和低变异性组。在4周的随访中探讨WS-SD与恶化风险的关系。在205个子研究参与者中,140人(68%)的日记完成率是足够的。WS-SD指标从基线到第4周的重现性(r)为0.32。高变异性受试者的圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)得分高于低变异性受试者(47.3±20.3 vs 39.6±21.5,p= 0.04)。探索性分析未发现症状变异性与HCRU恶化之间的关系。结论E-RS的sws - sd可作为COPD患者症状变异性的衡量指标。变异性较高的患者健康相关生活质量较差。应该进一步验证WS-SD作为一种度量,以了解症状可变性的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing COPD Symptom Variability in the Stable State Utilizing the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD Questionnaire.
Rationale It has been suggested that patients with COPD experience considerable daily respiratory symptom fluctuation. A standardized measure is needed to quantify and understand the implications of day-to-day symptom variability. Objectives To compare standard deviation with other statistical measures of symptom variability and identify characteristics of subjects with higher symptom variability. Methods Individuals in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) Exacerbations sub-study completed an Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) daily questionnaire. We calculated within-subject standard deviation (WS-SD) for each patient at week 0 and correlated this with measurements obtained four weeks later using Pearson's r and Bland Altman plots. Median WS-SD value dichotomized participants into higher versus lower variability groups. Association between WS-SD and exacerbation risk during four follow up weeks was explored. Measurements and Main Results Diary completion rates were sufficient in 140 (68%) of 205 sub-study participants. Reproducibility (r) of the WS-SD metric from baseline to week four was 0.32. Higher variability participants had higher St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (47.3 ± 20.3 vs 39.6 ± 21.5, p=.04) than lower variability participants. Exploratory analyses found no relationship between symptom variability and HCRU exacerbations. Conclusions WS-SD of the E-RS can be used as a measure of symptom variability in studies of patients with COPD. Patients with higher variability have worse health-related quality of life. WS-SD should be further validated as a measure to understand the implications of symptom variability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study. Sexual Orientation Health Disparities in Chronic Respiratory Disorders. COPD: Iron Deficiency and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With and Without Chronic Respiratory Failure. Impact of Bronchiectasis on COPD Severity and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as a Risk Factor in Individuals with a Heavy Smoking History. Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admissions, Health Status, and Behavioral Changes of Patients with COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1