智利养老基金分析:2011-2018年

Ricardo Méndez Romero, Hernán Rocha Pavés
{"title":"智利养老基金分析:2011-2018年","authors":"Ricardo Méndez Romero, Hernán Rocha Pavés","doi":"10.35692/07183992.12.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study are: 1) Carry out a comparative study of the performance of the different pension funds of each of the AFPs; 2) Carry out a comparative study of the historical performance of the different pension funds of each of the AFPs and compare them, in addition, with results of previous studies carried out by other authors.\nThe scope of this paper is defined as a descriptive-correlational investigation, because it is intended to identify the results of the management of investment portfolios, without manipulating the variables of the problem, these are iden- tified and described as they occur in their context financial, to then analyze them from a temporal and quantitative comparative perspective, based on the Principle of Investor Rationality of Harry Markowitz and applying the Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Omega ratio as performance models.\nAn important result observed is that, for this period of 8 years, all AFPs and funds present positive monthly average returns, even though the years 2011 and 2018 show losses, especially funds A, B and C. For their part, the benchmark of Market (IPSA) shows a negative performance. The financial performance ratios are all positive, which indicates that the performance / risk ratio is satisfied.\nThe different returns between AFP and IPSA are explained because pension funds have a high percentage of invest- ments abroad and include fixed income instruments. A more relevant comparison would be to reference the actual results with those of an equivalent fictitious portfolio, but to date, there are no studies that allow defining the parame- ters necessary to form said portfolio. Non-traditional ratios, such as Omega, are coincident when the distributions of the results have a normal configuration. In addition, the conclusion is shared with previous studies, that the AFPs tend to keep portfolios similar to each other, trying not to fall below the profitability of the system.","PeriodicalId":34468,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Business Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANÁLISIS DE LOS FONDOS DE PENSIONES EN CHILE: PERIODO 2011-2018\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Méndez Romero, Hernán Rocha Pavés\",\"doi\":\"10.35692/07183992.12.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objectives of this study are: 1) Carry out a comparative study of the performance of the different pension funds of each of the AFPs; 2) Carry out a comparative study of the historical performance of the different pension funds of each of the AFPs and compare them, in addition, with results of previous studies carried out by other authors.\\nThe scope of this paper is defined as a descriptive-correlational investigation, because it is intended to identify the results of the management of investment portfolios, without manipulating the variables of the problem, these are iden- tified and described as they occur in their context financial, to then analyze them from a temporal and quantitative comparative perspective, based on the Principle of Investor Rationality of Harry Markowitz and applying the Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Omega ratio as performance models.\\nAn important result observed is that, for this period of 8 years, all AFPs and funds present positive monthly average returns, even though the years 2011 and 2018 show losses, especially funds A, B and C. For their part, the benchmark of Market (IPSA) shows a negative performance. The financial performance ratios are all positive, which indicates that the performance / risk ratio is satisfied.\\nThe different returns between AFP and IPSA are explained because pension funds have a high percentage of invest- ments abroad and include fixed income instruments. A more relevant comparison would be to reference the actual results with those of an equivalent fictitious portfolio, but to date, there are no studies that allow defining the parame- ters necessary to form said portfolio. Non-traditional ratios, such as Omega, are coincident when the distributions of the results have a normal configuration. In addition, the conclusion is shared with previous studies, that the AFPs tend to keep portfolios similar to each other, trying not to fall below the profitability of the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multidisciplinary Business Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multidisciplinary Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.12.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.12.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是:1)对各养老基金的不同养老基金的绩效进行比较研究;2)对各AFPs的不同养老基金的历史业绩进行比较研究,并与其他作者之前的研究结果进行比较。本文的范围被定义为描述性相关调查,因为它旨在确定投资组合管理的结果,而不操纵问题的变量,这些结果被识别和描述为它们在其背景金融中发生,然后从时间和定量比较的角度分析它们,基于Harry Markowitz的投资者理性原则并应用Sharpe, Treynor,Jensen和Omega比率作为性能模型。观察到的一个重要结果是,在这8年的时间里,尽管2011年和2018年出现亏损,但所有afp和基金的月平均收益都为正,尤其是基金A、B和c。市场基准(IPSA)表现为负。财务绩效比率均为正,说明业绩/风险比是满意的。AFP和IPSA之间的不同回报可以解释,因为养老基金在海外的投资比例很高,而且包括固定收益工具。更相关的比较是将实际结果与等效的虚拟投资组合的结果进行比较,但到目前为止,还没有研究允许定义形成所述投资组合所需的参数。非传统的比率,如ω,当结果的分布具有正态配置时是一致的。此外,该结论与之前的研究一致,即afp倾向于保持彼此的投资组合相似,尽量不低于系统的盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANÁLISIS DE LOS FONDOS DE PENSIONES EN CHILE: PERIODO 2011-2018
The objectives of this study are: 1) Carry out a comparative study of the performance of the different pension funds of each of the AFPs; 2) Carry out a comparative study of the historical performance of the different pension funds of each of the AFPs and compare them, in addition, with results of previous studies carried out by other authors. The scope of this paper is defined as a descriptive-correlational investigation, because it is intended to identify the results of the management of investment portfolios, without manipulating the variables of the problem, these are iden- tified and described as they occur in their context financial, to then analyze them from a temporal and quantitative comparative perspective, based on the Principle of Investor Rationality of Harry Markowitz and applying the Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Omega ratio as performance models. An important result observed is that, for this period of 8 years, all AFPs and funds present positive monthly average returns, even though the years 2011 and 2018 show losses, especially funds A, B and C. For their part, the benchmark of Market (IPSA) shows a negative performance. The financial performance ratios are all positive, which indicates that the performance / risk ratio is satisfied. The different returns between AFP and IPSA are explained because pension funds have a high percentage of invest- ments abroad and include fixed income instruments. A more relevant comparison would be to reference the actual results with those of an equivalent fictitious portfolio, but to date, there are no studies that allow defining the parame- ters necessary to form said portfolio. Non-traditional ratios, such as Omega, are coincident when the distributions of the results have a normal configuration. In addition, the conclusion is shared with previous studies, that the AFPs tend to keep portfolios similar to each other, trying not to fall below the profitability of the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
El empoderamiento femenino a través del emprendimiento en la era digital Héctor y el Norte Elicitation Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour that analyses the intention to Adopt Electronic Commerce in the Elderly Fortalecimiento de micronegocios como motor de reactivación económica y estrategia de formación profesional 12 tips to create good titles for your manuscripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1