实证经济学中研发政策的经济学理论实证探讨

K. R.A
{"title":"实证经济学中研发政策的经济学理论实证探讨","authors":"K. R.A","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3687300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this discussion paper explains economic theory for research and development (R&D) policy. Dasgupta and Stiglitz (1980) illustrated the reasons for economic theory to be much complicated in the information field. Because economic results in an asymmetric information condition. This in turn causes a market failure. Therefore, technological policy was noted that Research and development (R&D) benefits depended on the technological opportunities. This technological condition is combined with several other structures, industries, patent laws, maintaining secrecy etc. Therefore, economic theory in the field of technology becomes more complicated. As a reason the most important concept of the economy theory engages in Research and development (R&D) because of R&D expenditure is designed to locate new or improved products and to reduce the manufacturing cost of the industry. At the same time, industrial structure determines the process of the R&D in the economy. This concept and indeed most of the theoretical investigations in recent years on the economic and technological changes have contributed to new economic trends. We called this “Positive economics”. These Positive economies are mainly oriented with research, because the Research can be described as a science that was developed to meet crucial problems. It is basically relevant to the countries engage in the R&D, to international relationships and to technological arguments. It is solely depended on the government Expenditure of the R&D. According to the empirical data shows government expenditure of the R&D in large six industrial countries in 1981, US 54%, UK 49%, France 39%, Sweden 15%, Switzerland 12%, Germany 9%, Japan 2%. These countries focus on a small number of technologies of strategic importance, primarily in aerospace, electronics, and nuclear energy. Therefore, today these countries were reached number of significant economics results and growth. In conclusion this structure of the investment in R&D yield two outcomes; research, and a higher level of intermediate skill in the working population (Human capital) . The fact that these skills are certified through a standardized system of examinations makes the internal labor market efficiency and informational efficiency of the human capital. Finally, this strong R&D policy motivated these countries to industrialize, and this process impacted on education push or countries establishing innovative education systems and rapid economic growth.","PeriodicalId":14586,"journal":{"name":"IO: Productivity","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Discussion of Economics Theory for R&D Policy in Positive Economics\",\"authors\":\"K. R.A\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3687300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this discussion paper explains economic theory for research and development (R&D) policy. Dasgupta and Stiglitz (1980) illustrated the reasons for economic theory to be much complicated in the information field. Because economic results in an asymmetric information condition. This in turn causes a market failure. Therefore, technological policy was noted that Research and development (R&D) benefits depended on the technological opportunities. This technological condition is combined with several other structures, industries, patent laws, maintaining secrecy etc. Therefore, economic theory in the field of technology becomes more complicated. As a reason the most important concept of the economy theory engages in Research and development (R&D) because of R&D expenditure is designed to locate new or improved products and to reduce the manufacturing cost of the industry. At the same time, industrial structure determines the process of the R&D in the economy. This concept and indeed most of the theoretical investigations in recent years on the economic and technological changes have contributed to new economic trends. We called this “Positive economics”. These Positive economies are mainly oriented with research, because the Research can be described as a science that was developed to meet crucial problems. It is basically relevant to the countries engage in the R&D, to international relationships and to technological arguments. It is solely depended on the government Expenditure of the R&D. According to the empirical data shows government expenditure of the R&D in large six industrial countries in 1981, US 54%, UK 49%, France 39%, Sweden 15%, Switzerland 12%, Germany 9%, Japan 2%. These countries focus on a small number of technologies of strategic importance, primarily in aerospace, electronics, and nuclear energy. Therefore, today these countries were reached number of significant economics results and growth. In conclusion this structure of the investment in R&D yield two outcomes; research, and a higher level of intermediate skill in the working population (Human capital) . The fact that these skills are certified through a standardized system of examinations makes the internal labor market efficiency and informational efficiency of the human capital. Finally, this strong R&D policy motivated these countries to industrialize, and this process impacted on education push or countries establishing innovative education systems and rapid economic growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Productivity\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Productivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Productivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇讨论论文中解释了研究与开发(R&D)政策的经济理论。Dasgupta和Stiglitz(1980)说明了经济理论在信息领域非常复杂的原因。因为经济是在信息不对称的条件下产生的。这反过来又导致了市场失灵。因此,技术政策指出,研究与发展(R&D)的利益取决于技术机会。这一技术条件与其他几个结构、行业、专利法、保密等相结合。因此,技术领域的经济理论变得更加复杂。作为一个原因,经济理论中最重要的概念是研究与开发(R&D),因为R&D支出的目的是找到新的或改进的产品,并降低行业的制造成本。同时,产业结构决定了经济中研发的过程。这一概念以及近年来大多数关于经济和技术变革的理论研究都促成了新的经济趋势。我们称之为“积极经济学”。这些积极的经济主要以研究为导向,因为研究可以被描述为一门科学,是为了解决关键问题而开发的。它基本上与从事研发的国家有关,与国际关系有关,与技术争论有关。这完全取决于研发的政府支出。根据实证数据显示,1981年六大工业国家的政府研发支出为:美国54%,英国49%,法国39%,瑞典15%,瑞士12%,德国9%,日本2%。这些国家专注于少数具有战略重要性的技术,主要是在航空航天、电子和核能领域。因此,今天这些国家都取得了一些显著的经济成果和增长。总之,这种研发投资结构产生两种结果;研究,以及工作人口中较高水平的中间技能(人力资本)。这些技能通过标准化的考试制度得到认证,使人力资本的内部劳动力市场效率和信息效率得以提高。最后,这种强有力的研发政策推动了这些国家的工业化,这一过程影响了各国建立创新教育体系和经济快速增长的教育推动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical Discussion of Economics Theory for R&D Policy in Positive Economics
In this discussion paper explains economic theory for research and development (R&D) policy. Dasgupta and Stiglitz (1980) illustrated the reasons for economic theory to be much complicated in the information field. Because economic results in an asymmetric information condition. This in turn causes a market failure. Therefore, technological policy was noted that Research and development (R&D) benefits depended on the technological opportunities. This technological condition is combined with several other structures, industries, patent laws, maintaining secrecy etc. Therefore, economic theory in the field of technology becomes more complicated. As a reason the most important concept of the economy theory engages in Research and development (R&D) because of R&D expenditure is designed to locate new or improved products and to reduce the manufacturing cost of the industry. At the same time, industrial structure determines the process of the R&D in the economy. This concept and indeed most of the theoretical investigations in recent years on the economic and technological changes have contributed to new economic trends. We called this “Positive economics”. These Positive economies are mainly oriented with research, because the Research can be described as a science that was developed to meet crucial problems. It is basically relevant to the countries engage in the R&D, to international relationships and to technological arguments. It is solely depended on the government Expenditure of the R&D. According to the empirical data shows government expenditure of the R&D in large six industrial countries in 1981, US 54%, UK 49%, France 39%, Sweden 15%, Switzerland 12%, Germany 9%, Japan 2%. These countries focus on a small number of technologies of strategic importance, primarily in aerospace, electronics, and nuclear energy. Therefore, today these countries were reached number of significant economics results and growth. In conclusion this structure of the investment in R&D yield two outcomes; research, and a higher level of intermediate skill in the working population (Human capital) . The fact that these skills are certified through a standardized system of examinations makes the internal labor market efficiency and informational efficiency of the human capital. Finally, this strong R&D policy motivated these countries to industrialize, and this process impacted on education push or countries establishing innovative education systems and rapid economic growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labour Productivity Improvements from Energy Efficiency Investments: The Experience of European Firms Green innovation downturn: the role of imperfect competition The Differential Impact of Intra-Firm Collaboration and Technological Network Centrality on Employees' Likelihood of Leaving the Firm Environmental Catastrophe and the Direction of Invention: Evidence from the American Dust Bowl An Industrial Organization Perspective on Productivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1