高流量鼻插管的脱机方案减少使用高流量鼻插管的儿童下呼吸道感染的脱机时间:泰国的单中心经验

{"title":"高流量鼻插管的脱机方案减少使用高流量鼻插管的儿童下呼吸道感染的脱机时间:泰国的单中心经验","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.05.13846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been widely accepted as non-invasive respiratory support in children suffering from lower respiratory tract infections (LRI). Patients who use HFNC still need respiratory care from health personnel in ICU or intermediate care wards. Without the weaning protocol, the authors had noticed prolonged HFNC use, which affected the length of hospital stay (LOS). As such, a pediatric patient care team (PCT) created the weaning protocol and collected data whether the weaning protocol would shorten weaning time.\n\nObjective: To compare HFNC weaning times among children suffering from LRI, before and after using the weaning protocol.\n\nMaterials and Methods: A pre- and post-intervention study of 1-month-old to 5-year-old children who received HFNC therapy for LRI at Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center between August 2018 and July 2020, the one year before and after the protocol was implemented in August 2019, were carried out. Demographic data and severity of respiratory illness according to Respiratory Assessment Score (RAS) were recorded. Multivariate linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, weight, RR, HR, SpO₂, and RAS before using HFNC, was used to compare between the pre- and post-weaning protocol groups according to total HFNC time, duration of weaning time, and LOS.\n\nResults: There were 25 patients in each group. The mean age in the post-weaning protocol group was lower, but there was no difference in severity. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that the post-weaning protocol group had a significantly shorter weaning time at 49.5±37.0 hours versus 84.2±62.8 hours (p=0.034). Moreover, total HFNC time was also significantly shorter in the post-weaning protocol group at 71.53±36.7 hours versus 119.6±78.2 hours (p=0.019). There was no difference in vital signs during weaning between the two groups.\n\nConclusion: Implementing the weaning protocol reduce weaning time and total HFNC time, without affecting clinical outcomes.\n\nKeywords: High flow nasal cannula; Weaning protocol; Lower respiratory tract infection; Length of stay","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Weaning Protocol of High Flow Nasal Cannula Reduce Duration of Weaning in Lower-Respiratory Tract Infection in Children Who Used High Flow Nasal Cannula: Single Center Experience in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.05.13846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been widely accepted as non-invasive respiratory support in children suffering from lower respiratory tract infections (LRI). Patients who use HFNC still need respiratory care from health personnel in ICU or intermediate care wards. Without the weaning protocol, the authors had noticed prolonged HFNC use, which affected the length of hospital stay (LOS). As such, a pediatric patient care team (PCT) created the weaning protocol and collected data whether the weaning protocol would shorten weaning time.\\n\\nObjective: To compare HFNC weaning times among children suffering from LRI, before and after using the weaning protocol.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods: A pre- and post-intervention study of 1-month-old to 5-year-old children who received HFNC therapy for LRI at Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center between August 2018 and July 2020, the one year before and after the protocol was implemented in August 2019, were carried out. Demographic data and severity of respiratory illness according to Respiratory Assessment Score (RAS) were recorded. Multivariate linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, weight, RR, HR, SpO₂, and RAS before using HFNC, was used to compare between the pre- and post-weaning protocol groups according to total HFNC time, duration of weaning time, and LOS.\\n\\nResults: There were 25 patients in each group. The mean age in the post-weaning protocol group was lower, but there was no difference in severity. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that the post-weaning protocol group had a significantly shorter weaning time at 49.5±37.0 hours versus 84.2±62.8 hours (p=0.034). Moreover, total HFNC time was also significantly shorter in the post-weaning protocol group at 71.53±36.7 hours versus 119.6±78.2 hours (p=0.019). There was no difference in vital signs during weaning between the two groups.\\n\\nConclusion: Implementing the weaning protocol reduce weaning time and total HFNC time, without affecting clinical outcomes.\\n\\nKeywords: High flow nasal cannula; Weaning protocol; Lower respiratory tract infection; Length of stay\",\"PeriodicalId\":17486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.05.13846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.05.13846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)已被广泛接受为下呼吸道感染(LRI)儿童的无创呼吸支持。使用HFNC的患者仍然需要重症监护病房或中级监护病房卫生人员的呼吸护理。在没有断奶方案的情况下,作者注意到HFNC的使用时间延长,这影响了住院时间(LOS)。因此,一个儿科患者护理小组(PCT)制定了断奶方案,并收集了断奶方案是否会缩短断奶时间的数据。目的:比较LRI患儿在使用断奶方案前后的HFNC断奶次数。材料与方法:对2018年8月至2020年7月(即2019年8月实施方案前后一年)在Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan医疗中心接受HFNC治疗LRI的1个月至5岁儿童进行干预前和干预后研究。根据呼吸评估评分(RAS)记录人口统计数据和呼吸系统疾病严重程度。采用多变量线性回归,调整了使用HFNC前的年龄、性别、体重、RR、HR、SpO₂和RAS,根据HFNC总时间、脱机时间持续时间和LOS比较脱机前和脱机后方案组之间的差异。结果:每组25例。断奶后方案组的平均年龄较低,但严重程度没有差异。多变量线性回归显示,断奶后方案组的断奶时间为49.5±37.0小时,显著低于84.2±62.8小时(p=0.034)。此外,断奶后方案组的HFNC总时间也显著缩短,分别为71.53±36.7小时和119.6±78.2小时(p=0.019)。两组断奶时生命体征无差异。结论:实施脱机方案可减少脱机时间和总HFNC时间,不影响临床结果。关键词:高流量鼻插管;断奶协议;下呼吸道感染;停留时间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Weaning Protocol of High Flow Nasal Cannula Reduce Duration of Weaning in Lower-Respiratory Tract Infection in Children Who Used High Flow Nasal Cannula: Single Center Experience in Thailand
Background: Use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been widely accepted as non-invasive respiratory support in children suffering from lower respiratory tract infections (LRI). Patients who use HFNC still need respiratory care from health personnel in ICU or intermediate care wards. Without the weaning protocol, the authors had noticed prolonged HFNC use, which affected the length of hospital stay (LOS). As such, a pediatric patient care team (PCT) created the weaning protocol and collected data whether the weaning protocol would shorten weaning time. Objective: To compare HFNC weaning times among children suffering from LRI, before and after using the weaning protocol. Materials and Methods: A pre- and post-intervention study of 1-month-old to 5-year-old children who received HFNC therapy for LRI at Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center between August 2018 and July 2020, the one year before and after the protocol was implemented in August 2019, were carried out. Demographic data and severity of respiratory illness according to Respiratory Assessment Score (RAS) were recorded. Multivariate linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, weight, RR, HR, SpO₂, and RAS before using HFNC, was used to compare between the pre- and post-weaning protocol groups according to total HFNC time, duration of weaning time, and LOS. Results: There were 25 patients in each group. The mean age in the post-weaning protocol group was lower, but there was no difference in severity. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that the post-weaning protocol group had a significantly shorter weaning time at 49.5±37.0 hours versus 84.2±62.8 hours (p=0.034). Moreover, total HFNC time was also significantly shorter in the post-weaning protocol group at 71.53±36.7 hours versus 119.6±78.2 hours (p=0.019). There was no difference in vital signs during weaning between the two groups. Conclusion: Implementing the weaning protocol reduce weaning time and total HFNC time, without affecting clinical outcomes. Keywords: High flow nasal cannula; Weaning protocol; Lower respiratory tract infection; Length of stay
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1